모든 템플릿

Workforce Happiness & Job Confidence Pulse Survey

A CNBC|SurveyMonkey-style workforce pulse that tracks how happy, secure, and engaged employees feel right now — covering pay fairness, workload, leadership trust, and flight risk. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind low happiness or job-security scores so HR and leadership see the real drivers, not just the number.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes for our workforce pulse check. We want an honest read on how work is going for you right now — your answers are used to spot trends, not to single anyone out. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 8 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how happy are you with your current job right now?

척도: 010
최소:Extremely unhappy최대:Extremely happy
Q03
객관식필수

How confident are you that your job will still exist at this company in 12 months?

  • Very confident
  • Somewhat confident
  • Not very confident
  • Not at all confident
  • Not sure
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree or disagree with each statement about your current workplace?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • I am paid fairly for the work I do
  • My workload is manageable
  • I have real opportunities to grow here
  • I trust senior leadership to make good decisions
  • I would recommend this company as a good place to work
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you think about what makes a job worth staying in, which of these matters most and which matters least to you?

  • Compensation and raises
  • Job security
  • Flexible or remote work options
  • Career growth opportunities
  • Company culture
  • Benefits (healthcare, retirement, etc.)
  • Work-life balance
  • Quality of my direct manager
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q06
객관식필수

What is your current work arrangement?

  • Fully remote
  • Hybrid (mix of remote and in-office)
  • Fully in-office
  • Fully on-site (non-office role)
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to actively look for a new job in the next 6 months?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall happiness score and job-security confidence rating. If either score was low, ask what specifically triggered it (a decision, a manager interaction, a market rumor, workload) and what would need to change for it to improve. If the respondent indicated they are likely to look for a new job, ask what would make them stay versus what is actively pushing them out. Get concrete, recent examples rather than general complaints.

Q09
장문형

If you could change one thing about your job or workplace right now, what would it be?

Q10
객관식

Which industry best describes your employer? (Prefer not to say if you'd rather skip this)

  • Technology
  • Financial services
  • Healthcare
  • Retail or consumer goods
  • Manufacturing
  • Education
  • Government or nonprofit
  • Professional services
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How many employees work at your company?

  • Under 50
  • 50-249
  • 250-999
  • 1,000-4,999
  • 5,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you worked at your current company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the honest feedback. Your responses feed into an aggregate workforce report used to guide decisions on pay, growth, and management practices; no individual answers are shared with your manager.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static happiness and job-security scores by using an AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind low happiness or job-security ratings, surfacing the 'why' behind the number.
  • Combines quantitative measures (happiness scale, job-security confidence, flight-risk likelihood, agreement matrix, max-diff on what makes a job worth staying in) with an open long-text question and a targeted AI probe for richer context.
  • Covers the same core pulse dimensions — pay fairness, workload, leadership trust, flight risk — plus firmographic and demographic breakouts (industry, company size, tenure, age) for segmented reporting.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports mean HR and leadership get synthesized findings, not just raw score dumps to manually interpret.

SurveyMonkey

CNBC X Surveymonkey Workforce Survey Template

A fielding-ready workforce survey template co-branded with CNBC, covering similar ground on workforce sentiment. It's a static question set built for benchmarking rather than open-ended discovery. Good for standardized tracking, but it won't adapt to individual responses.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a recognizable media brand (CNBC) for credibility
  • Ready-to-field template within SurveyMonkey's established survey platform
  • Likely benefits from broad benchmarking data given SurveyMonkey's scale

아쉬운 점

  • Static question format with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into low scores
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency since there are no AI-driven questions
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated narrative reports

SurveySparrow

Employee Confidence Pulse Survey Template

A pulse-style template focused on employee confidence, originally framed around COVID-19-era workforce concerns. It offers a fixed set of confidence-related questions rather than follow-up probing tailored to each respondent. Useful as a quick baseline check, but the COVID-19 framing suggests it may need updating for general year-round use.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built around employee confidence, aligning with job-security themes
  • Simple, quick-to-deploy pulse format
  • Part of a broader survey template library with conversational-style UI

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore reasons behind low confidence scores
  • Framed around COVID-19 context, which may not reflect current workforce concerns
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.