QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Patient Referral Experience & Handoff Survey

Tracks how smoothly patients move from being referred to actually being seen by a specialist — scheduling ease, clarity of instructions, and communication between providers — with an AI follow-up that pinpoints exactly where the handoff broke down or worked well. Built for practice managers and care coordination teams.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how your recent referral went. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your feedback helps us make handoffs between your provider and specialists smoother for future patients. About 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

What type of specialist or service were you referred to? (Template note: replace with the specialty list most relevant to your practice.)

  • Cardiology
  • Orthopedics
  • Dermatology
  • Physical Therapy
  • Imaging or Diagnostic Testing
  • Mental or Behavioral Health
  • Other specialist
Q03
객관식필수

How much time passed between your referral being made and your specialist appointment actually happening (or being scheduled)?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1-2 weeks
  • 3-4 weeks
  • More than a month
  • I still haven't been able to schedule it
Q04
의견 척도필수

How clear were the instructions you received about next steps after your referral (e.g., who to call, what forms or authorizations were needed)?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q05
매트릭스필수

Please rate each part of your referral experience.

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • Ease of scheduling the specialist appointment
  • Communication between your primary provider and the specialist's office
  • Amount of information you received about why you were referred
  • Wait time between the referral and your appointment
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q06
객관식필수

Did you complete the appointment you were referred to?

  • Yes, I completed it
  • Not yet, but it's scheduled
  • No, I decided not to go
  • No, I couldn't get an appointment
Q07
평점 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate your experience with the referral process from start to finish?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q08
AI 인터뷰

For respondents whose referral was delayed, incomplete, or rated poorly, reconstruct the specific breakdown: was it the referral paperwork, insurance authorization, scheduling with the specialist's office, or unclear instructions from their own provider. Anchor on the exact point in the process where things went wrong and what would have fixed it. If the referral went smoothly, probe what specifically made the handoff between providers feel seamless so it can be replicated for other patients.

Q09
의견 척도

Based on how your referral was handled, how likely are you to recommend this practice to friends or family?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
객관식

Which age group do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-34
  • 35-49
  • 50-64
  • 65 or older
Q11
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be reviewed by our care coordination team to identify where referral handoffs can be made faster and clearer for future patients.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that automatically triggers for respondents whose referral was delayed, incomplete, or rated poorly, and probes to reconstruct exactly where the handoff broke down or worked well — something a static form can't do.
  • Uses a matrix question to rate distinct parts of the referral journey (scheduling, instructions, communication) alongside a separate overall experience rating, so practice managers see both granular and holistic views.
  • Pairs objective process metrics (time between referral and appointment, completion status, clarity of instructions) with recommendation likelihood and demographic segmentation, then rolls it all into an auto-generated report.
  • Opens and closes with conversational chat messages that set expectations and confirm care-coordination staff will review responses, which reads more like a guided conversation than a cold intake form.

Jotform

Patient Referral Form Template

This is a static intake-style form for capturing referral details (e.g., patient info, referring provider, specialist), not a post-referral experience/feedback survey. It's fielding-ready as a document-style form but doesn't measure how the handoff felt to the patient. Jotform's strength is broad customization and integrations rather than experience research.

잘하는 점

  • Highly customizable drag-and-drop form builder
  • Free tier available
  • Wide range of integrations with EHR/CRM-adjacent tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up probing on delayed or poor-quality referrals
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or synthesized report
  • No transparent, publishable prompt/methodology for how responses are analyzed

SurveySparrow

Free Patient Referral Form Template | For Medical Institutions

Framed as a referral intake form for medical institutions rather than a survey tracking the patient's referral-to-appointment experience. Its conversational, chat-like question flow is a genuine strength for completion rates, but it stops at data collection with no deeper diagnostic layer. Free to use, per the page.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style question flow
  • Mobile-friendly design
  • Free template offering

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to pinpoint where a handoff broke down
  • No automated quality scoring per response
  • No auto-generated analysis report for care coordination teams

Typeform

Patient Referral Form Template

Another referral-intake-oriented template rather than a purpose-built patient experience/handoff survey. Typeform's polished, one-question-at-a-time interface is a genuine usability strength, but the template is a fixed question set with no dynamic branching into experience diagnostics. Good for basic intake, not for root-cause analysis of referral friction.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, one-question-at-a-time interface with strong completion UX
  • Easy visual customization
  • Established brand familiarity among respondents

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up for poorly-rated referrals
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No voice AI interview option or auto-generated diagnostic report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기