Permission Request Clarity & Consent Experience Survey
Measures how clear, fair, and trustworthy a specific permission or consent request felt to the person being asked — whether it's photo/video release, data sharing, minor participation, or facility access. Built for any organization that formally asks people for permission. An AI follow-up reconstructs the real decision moment, surfacing what almost changed their answer.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which type of permission were you asked to grant? (Template note: replace these options with the specific permission types your organization requests.)
- Photo or video use
- Personal data or information sharing
- A minor's participation in an activity
- Property or facility access
- (Replace with another permission type)
How did you receive this permission request?
- Paper form
- Mobile app or online portal
- In person or verbally
How clear was the request about exactly what you were being asked to permit?
Thinking about how this request was handled, how much do you agree with each statement?
- The language used was easy to understand
- I was given enough time to decide
- I felt comfortable asking questions before deciding
- I did not feel pressured to say yes
What did you ultimately decide?
- I granted full permission
- I granted permission with conditions or limits
- I declined
- I have not decided yet
Which of these mattered most when you were deciding whether to grant this permission?
- How clearly the request was explained
- How much I trusted the person or organization asking
- How much time pressure I felt
- The perceived risk to me or others
- The perceived benefit to me or others
- How easy it was to ask questions
- Legal or contractual obligations
- My past experience with similar requests
Reconstruct the respondent's decision-making process for this specific permission request: what almost changed their mind, and, if they declined or added conditions, exactly what would need to be different for them to say yes outright. If they granted it quickly and without hesitation, probe what made the request feel trustworthy enough to skip second-guessing.
How likely are you to grant a future permission request from this same organization?
What, if anything, would have made this permission request easier or faster to decide on?
Which best describes your role in this request?
- Parent or guardian
- Patient or client
- Employee or staff member
- Property owner or tenant
- Other
What is your age range?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
That's everything, thank you! Your responses will be used to make our permission requests clearer, fairer, and easier to decide on.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual decision moment and surfaces what almost changed the respondent's answer, not just a static rating
- Covers any type of permission request (photo/video release, data sharing, minor participation, facility access) rather than being locked to one use case like a school permission slip
- Combines a clarity opinion scale, a matrix of fairness/trust statements, and a MaxDiff prioritization question to triangulate what drove the decision, plus a long-text question capturing what would have made the request easier
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report turn open-ended decision narratives into usable findings without manual coding
SurveySparrow
Permission Request Form TemplateThis is a ready-to-field form template aimed at the education sector, designed to collect signed permission (e.g., for field trips or activities) rather than to research how the request itself was experienced. It's a straightforward data-capture form, not a survey built to probe clarity, fairness, or the decision-making process behind granting permission. Good for operational permission collection, but not for measuring consent experience quality.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for education-context permission slips, so it's immediately usable for schools
- Likely simple to set up and send as a standard form
- Part of a broader survey/form platform with standard distribution options
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore why a respondent almost said no or what nearly changed their decision
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology, and no built-in matrix/MaxDiff-style question mix to unpack decision drivers
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.