모든 템플릿

Public Library Patron Experience & Usage Survey

Measures how often people use their local public library, which services they rely on, and how satisfied they are with staff, collections, hours, and digital access. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind their satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing what would actually get them back in the door more often — useful for library directors and city/county planning teams.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your library experience! Your feedback helps shape hours, collections, and programs. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes, and there are no wrong answers.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how often have you visited a public library branch in person?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • About monthly
  • Weekly or more
Q03
객관식필수

Which of the following have you used at the library in the last 6 months?

  • Borrowing physical books, movies, or music
  • Borrowing e-books or digital media
  • Computers or internet access
  • Study or meeting rooms
  • Children's or youth programs
  • Adult classes or workshops
  • Reference or research help from staff
  • Community events or exhibits
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your local library?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Staff are helpful and knowledgeable
  • The collection (books, media, digital resources) meets my needs
  • The facility is clean and comfortable
  • Operating hours are convenient for my schedule
  • Digital resources (e-books, apps, website) are easy to use
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend your local library to a friend, neighbor, or coworker?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score and their agreement ratings on staff, collection, hours, and digital resources. Anchor on a specific recent visit or interaction rather than general impressions, and ask what almost stopped them from recommending the library or, if the score was low, what would need to change for them to raise it. If they mention a specific negative experience, ask what staff or the library could have done differently in that moment.

Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

If your library could only invest in a few of these improvements, which would matter most and least to you?

  • Extended evening or weekend hours
  • More e-book and digital media titles
  • More computers or faster internet
  • Wider variety of programs and events
  • Better parking or accessibility
  • Quieter study spaces
  • Faster hold pickup and returns
  • Improved website or mobile app
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
객관식

What was the main reason for your most recent library visit?

  • Borrow books or media
  • Use computers or internet
  • Attend a program or event
  • Study or use a meeting room
  • Get research or reference help
  • Bring children for activities
  • Other
Q09
장문형

What's one change that would make you visit the library more often, or use it more?

Q10
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Do you have children under 18 in your household?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for sharing your library experience! Your answers, along with everyone else's, go directly into a report the library uses to plan hours, collections, and programs.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static rating questions with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific moment behind a patron's recommendation and agreement scores, surfacing the 'why' instead of just the 'what'
  • Combines usage frequency, service reliance (multiple-choice), and a satisfaction matrix with a MaxDiff trade-off question to prioritize which improvements (hours, collections, digital access, staff) matter most
  • Includes an open-ended open-text question capturing concrete changes that would drive more visits, paired with demographic and household context (age range, children under 18) for segmentation
  • Delivers an auto-generated report from the responses plus the adaptive interview data, useful for library directors and city/county planning teams making budget or hours decisions

QuestionPro

Public Library Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a genuinely comparable template covering library usage, satisfaction, and service questions for patron feedback. It appears to function more as a sample questionnaire/reference page with question examples rather than a ready-to-field adaptive survey. It's a reasonable starting point for teams wanting to build their own static questionnaire.

잘하는 점

  • Covers core library patron topics like usage frequency, services used, and satisfaction
  • Presented as a structured questionnaire template that's easy to skim and adapt
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type support

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind a satisfaction or recommendation score — respondents just pick an answer with no deeper 'why' captured
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks for richer qualitative input
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology published on the page

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.