QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Cable & Satellite TV Service Satisfaction Survey

Measures how subscribers rate their cable or satellite TV provider on channel lineup, reliability, price, and support — and uses an AI follow-up to dig into the real reasons behind cord-cutting consideration. Built for pay-TV providers and MVPDs tracking churn risk and renewal drivers.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on your TV service! This helps providers improve what you get for your subscription. About 5 minutes, and your answers stay confidential.

Q02
객관식필수

Which provider do you currently use for cable or satellite TV?

  • (Replace with Provider A)
  • (Replace with Provider B)
  • (Replace with Provider C)
  • (Replace with Provider D)
  • Other
Q03
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend your current TV provider to a friend or family member?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q04
매트릭스필수

How satisfied are you with each part of your TV service?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Variety of channels included
  • Picture and sound quality
  • Reliability of your signal (no outages or freezing)
  • Value for the price you pay
  • Responsiveness of customer service
열: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q05
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did you experience a service interruption (signal loss, freezing, or outage)?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more often
Q06
평점 척도

If you contacted customer service in the last 3 months, how would you rate that most recent interaction? (Skip if not applicable.)

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you think about what matters most in a TV service, which of these is most important to you and which matters least?

  • Variety of channels
  • Price you pay each month
  • On-demand and streaming app access
  • DVR and recording features
  • Reliability of the signal
  • Quality of customer service
  • Bundling with internet or phone
  • Flexibility to change plans without penalty
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
객관식필수

In the last 6 months, have you seriously considered switching from cable/satellite to streaming-only services?

  • Yes, seriously considered it
  • Thought about it briefly
  • No, haven't considered it
  • Not sure
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore the real story behind the respondent's satisfaction rating and switching consideration. If they've considered switching to streaming, probe what specifically triggered that thought (a price increase, an outage, a bad support call, missing content) and what would need to change for them to stay. If they haven't considered switching, ask what keeps them loyal despite any complaints they gave in the earlier ratings. Anchor on their most recent concrete experience rather than general impressions.

Q10
의견 척도필수

Overall, how fair does the price you pay feel for the TV service you get?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q11
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How many people, including yourself, regularly watch TV in your household?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly into a report on where TV service quality is falling short and what keeps subscribers loyal.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond satisfaction ratings with an AI follow-up interview that explores the real reasons behind a subscriber's satisfaction score and any cord-cutting consideration
  • Combines a matrix rating of service dimensions (channel lineup, reliability, price, support) with a MaxDiff exercise to rank what matters most, giving both breadth and priority data
  • Captures recent, concrete behavior (service interruptions in the last 30 days, customer service contact in the last 3 months, switching consideration in the last 6 months) rather than only general impressions
  • Ends in an auto-generated report that ties quantitative ratings to the qualitative 'why' surfaced in the AI follow-up, useful for tracking churn risk and renewal drivers

SurveyMonkey

Cable & Satellite Survey Template

A ready-to-field template covering satisfaction with cable/satellite TV service, built on SurveyMonkey's established survey platform. It's a static questionnaire with standard question types rather than an adaptive interview experience. Good for benchmarking against a large, familiar survey tool, but the depth of follow-up depends entirely on the questions the researcher writes in advance.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a widely used, mature survey platform with broad distribution options
  • Likely offers easy customization and quick deployment given SurveyMonkey's template library format
  • Familiar respondent experience for panels already accustomed to SurveyMonkey surveys

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed question set regardless of their answers
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks for deeper diagnostic feedback
  • No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Cable Satellite Survey Template | Viewer Preferences

SurveySparrow's template focuses on viewer preferences for cable/satellite services within its conversational survey format. It presents questions in a chat-like flow, but this is scripted conversational UI, not true adaptive AI probing based on response content. Useful as a preference-tracking tool, though it appears narrower in scope (preferences) than a full satisfaction-and-churn diagnostic.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format that may feel more engaging than a traditional form
  • Focused specifically on viewer preferences, which can complement broader satisfaction tracking
  • Part of an established survey platform with template-based quick start

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is not the same as adaptive AI follow-up — question branching is pre-scripted, not dynamically generated from the respondent's actual answer
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share task capability for richer qualitative diagnosis
  • No visible automated quality scoring of individual responses or published prompt transparency

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기