Consumer Trust in Carbon Offset Claims Survey
Measures consumer trust in corporate carbon-offset claims, preferences for emissions reductions vs. offsets, and willingness to pay a premium. Designed to inform ESG strategy, sustainability communications, and brand positioning.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the past 12 months, have you seen or heard companies make "carbon neutral" or carbon-offset claims?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
The next few questions ask how much you trust different types of carbon-offset claims companies make.
Now, think about what information would change how much you trust an offset claim. For each detail below, indicate how much it would increase or decrease your trust.
When it comes to addressing their environmental impact, where should companies place greater emphasis?
If you trusted a company's carbon-offset claims, how willing would you be to pay a premium for their product?
In the past 12 months, have you personally paid extra for carbon offsets (e.g., at checkout, for flights, or via donations)?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
What would most increase your confidence in a company's carbon-offset claims?
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey—your perspectives are valuable and will help inform research on corporate climate action. Your responses have been recorded.
Where have you seen or heard these claims? (Select all that apply.)
- On product packaging
- On company websites
- In advertisements (online, TV, print)
- In-store signage
- On social media
- In sustainability or CSR reports
- In news articles or press releases
- Other (please specify)
How much do you trust a company that claims: "We are carbon neutral"?
How would your trust in a carbon-offset claim change if the company provided independent third-party verification of its offsets?
Rank the following factors by how much they matter to you when evaluating a company's carbon-offset claims. (1 = most important)
- Evidence is specific and verifiable
- Offsets address only unavoidable emissions
- Environmental additionality is demonstrated
- Long-term monitoring is in place
- Cost-effectiveness of the offset
- Brand or company credibility
How likely are you to choose a product with credible carbon-offset claims over a similar product without such claims, if both are the same price?
Where did you pay for carbon offsets? (Select all that apply.)
- Air travel offset add-on
- Retail checkout add-on (online or in-store)
- Donation to a climate project
- Utility or energy green tariff
- Subscription to a climate or tree-planting program
- Other (please specify)
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about companies' use of carbon offsets and their approach to climate action.
Which best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How much do you trust a company that claims: "This product's carbon emissions have been fully offset"?
How would your trust change if the company disclosed specific project details (e.g., location, project type, developer)?
Rank the following climate actions in order of where you think companies should invest most. (1 = highest priority)
- Emissions reductions in own operations
- Supplier and logistics decarbonization
- Product design and efficiency improvements
- High-quality nature-based offsets (e.g., reforestation)
- High-quality technology-based carbon removals
- Measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV)
Where do you currently live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How much do you trust a company that claims: "We offset X tonnes of CO₂ annually through verified projects"?
How would your trust change if the company published a transparent cost breakdown showing how offset funds are spent?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Postgraduate degree
- Prefer not to say
How much do you trust a company that claims: "Certified carbon neutral by an independent third party"?
How would your trust change if the company demonstrated that its offsets are additional (i.e., would not have happened without the company's funding)?
What is your current employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Homemaker
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
How would your trust change if the company provided regular public progress reports on its offset projects?
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a single trust rating by testing five distinct claim types (self-declared, product-level, tonnage-based, third-party certified) to see which specific wording actually builds credibility.
- Includes a dedicated block on what would increase trust — independent verification, project detail disclosure, cost breakdowns, additionality, and progress reporting — giving ESG teams actionable levers, not just a score.
- Pairs ranking questions (priority of reduction vs. offsetting, order of climate actions) with willingness-to-pay and choice-likelihood scales to connect trust directly to purchase behavior.
- Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes open-ended reasoning behind respondents' trust and WTP answers, plus an auto-generated report — depth a static claims-testing form can't produce.
SurveySparrow
Consumer Brand Preference Questionnaire Template | To know the effect of advertisementThis is a general brand-preference/advertising-effect template, not a carbon-offset or sustainability-claims instrument, so it would need heavy rebuilding to measure trust in ESG claims specifically. It's a fielding-ready template for its stated purpose, with SurveySparrow's usual conversational form style.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that can improve completion rates
- Ready-to-use template structure for measuring general brand perception
아쉬운 점
- No content addressing carbon-offset trust, ESG claim types, or willingness-to-pay for sustainability premiums
- Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended answers
SurveyMonkey
Messaging/claims Testing Survey TemplateThis is a general-purpose claims/messaging-testing template, useful for gauging reaction to specific marketing statements but not built around carbon offsets, ESG trust drivers, or offset-related willingness to pay. It is a fielding-ready generic template that a sustainability team would need to substantially customize.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for testing how different message wording lands with audiences
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel tools
아쉬운 점
- No carbon-offset-specific content (claim types, additionality, certification trust) out of the box
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI interview to probe why a claim was or wasn't trusted
- No transparent, published prompt methodology behind any AI-assisted analysis
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.