모든 템플릿

Consumer Trust in Carbon Offset Claims Survey

Measures consumer trust in corporate carbon-offset claims, preferences for emissions reductions vs. offsets, and willingness to pay a premium. Designed to inform ESG strategy, sustainability communications, and brand positioning.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this research study on carbon offsets and emissions reductions. This survey takes approximately 13 minutes. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, will be anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for research purposes.

Q02
객관식

In the past 12 months, have you seen or heard companies make "carbon neutral" or carbon-offset claims?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
메시지

The next few questions ask how much you trust different types of carbon-offset claims companies make.

Q04
메시지

Now, think about what information would change how much you trust an offset claim. For each detail below, indicate how much it would increase or decrease your trust.

Q05
의견 척도

When it comes to addressing their environmental impact, where should companies place greater emphasis?

척도: 17
최소:Much greater emphasis on directly reducing emissions최대:Much greater emphasis on purchasing carbon offsets
Q06
의견 척도

If you trusted a company's carbon-offset claims, how willing would you be to pay a premium for their product?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all willing최대:Extremely willing
Q07
객관식

In the past 12 months, have you personally paid extra for carbon offsets (e.g., at checkout, for flights, or via donations)?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q08
장문형

What would most increase your confidence in a company's carbon-offset claims?

Q09
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey—your perspectives are valuable and will help inform research on corporate climate action. Your responses have been recorded.

Q11
객관식

Where have you seen or heard these claims? (Select all that apply.)

  • On product packaging
  • On company websites
  • In advertisements (online, TV, print)
  • In-store signage
  • On social media
  • In sustainability or CSR reports
  • In news articles or press releases
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
의견 척도

How much do you trust a company that claims: "We are carbon neutral"?

척도: 17
최소:Do not trust at all최대:Trust completely
Q13
의견 척도

How would your trust in a carbon-offset claim change if the company provided independent third-party verification of its offsets?

척도: 17
최소:Greatly decrease my trust최대:Greatly increase my trust
Q14
순위 매기기

Rank the following factors by how much they matter to you when evaluating a company's carbon-offset claims. (1 = most important)

  1. Evidence is specific and verifiable
  2. Offsets address only unavoidable emissions
  3. Environmental additionality is demonstrated
  4. Long-term monitoring is in place
  5. Cost-effectiveness of the offset
  6. Brand or company credibility
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q15
의견 척도

How likely are you to choose a product with credible carbon-offset claims over a similar product without such claims, if both are the same price?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q16
객관식

Where did you pay for carbon offsets? (Select all that apply.)

  • Air travel offset add-on
  • Retail checkout add-on (online or in-store)
  • Donation to a climate project
  • Utility or energy green tariff
  • Subscription to a climate or tree-planting program
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about companies' use of carbon offsets and their approach to climate action.

Q18
객관식

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
의견 척도

How much do you trust a company that claims: "This product's carbon emissions have been fully offset"?

척도: 17
최소:Do not trust at all최대:Trust completely
Q20
의견 척도

How would your trust change if the company disclosed specific project details (e.g., location, project type, developer)?

척도: 17
최소:Greatly decrease my trust최대:Greatly increase my trust
Q21
순위 매기기

Rank the following climate actions in order of where you think companies should invest most. (1 = highest priority)

  1. Emissions reductions in own operations
  2. Supplier and logistics decarbonization
  3. Product design and efficiency improvements
  4. High-quality nature-based offsets (e.g., reforestation)
  5. High-quality technology-based carbon removals
  6. Measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q22
드롭다운

Where do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
의견 척도

How much do you trust a company that claims: "We offset X tonnes of CO₂ annually through verified projects"?

척도: 17
최소:Do not trust at all최대:Trust completely
Q24
의견 척도

How would your trust change if the company published a transparent cost breakdown showing how offset funds are spent?

척도: 17
최소:Greatly decrease my trust최대:Greatly increase my trust
Q25
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
의견 척도

How much do you trust a company that claims: "Certified carbon neutral by an independent third party"?

척도: 17
최소:Do not trust at all최대:Trust completely
Q27
의견 척도

How would your trust change if the company demonstrated that its offsets are additional (i.e., would not have happened without the company's funding)?

척도: 17
최소:Greatly decrease my trust최대:Greatly increase my trust
Q28
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker
  • Unemployed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
의견 척도

How would your trust change if the company provided regular public progress reports on its offset projects?

척도: 17
최소:Greatly decrease my trust최대:Greatly increase my trust

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a single trust rating by testing five distinct claim types (self-declared, product-level, tonnage-based, third-party certified) to see which specific wording actually builds credibility.
  • Includes a dedicated block on what would increase trust — independent verification, project detail disclosure, cost breakdowns, additionality, and progress reporting — giving ESG teams actionable levers, not just a score.
  • Pairs ranking questions (priority of reduction vs. offsetting, order of climate actions) with willingness-to-pay and choice-likelihood scales to connect trust directly to purchase behavior.
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes open-ended reasoning behind respondents' trust and WTP answers, plus an auto-generated report — depth a static claims-testing form can't produce.

SurveySparrow

Consumer Brand Preference Questionnaire Template | To know the effect of advertisement

This is a general brand-preference/advertising-effect template, not a carbon-offset or sustainability-claims instrument, so it would need heavy rebuilding to measure trust in ESG claims specifically. It's a fielding-ready template for its stated purpose, with SurveySparrow's usual conversational form style.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format that can improve completion rates
  • Ready-to-use template structure for measuring general brand perception

아쉬운 점

  • No content addressing carbon-offset trust, ESG claim types, or willingness-to-pay for sustainability premiums
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended answers

SurveyMonkey

Messaging/claims Testing Survey Template

This is a general-purpose claims/messaging-testing template, useful for gauging reaction to specific marketing statements but not built around carbon offsets, ESG trust drivers, or offset-related willingness to pay. It is a fielding-ready generic template that a sustainability team would need to substantially customize.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for testing how different message wording lands with audiences
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel tools

아쉬운 점

  • No carbon-offset-specific content (claim types, additionality, certification trust) out of the box
  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI interview to probe why a claim was or wasn't trusted
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology behind any AI-assisted analysis

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.