모든 템플릿

B2B Vendor Relationship Resilience During the Pandemic

Assesses how a specific vendor, supplier, or business partner performed during pandemic-era disruptions — reliability, communication, pricing, and flexibility — and which changes have stuck since. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident that made or broke trust, going beyond the overall rating to the moment that mattered.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how this vendor relationship held up during the pandemic. Your honest experience helps us understand what worked, what didn't, and what should stay in place going forward. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Overall, how did your organization's relationship with this vendor change during the pandemic (2020-2022)?

  • Significantly improved
  • Somewhat improved
  • Stayed about the same
  • Somewhat worsened
  • Significantly worsened
Q03
매트릭스필수

During pandemic-related disruptions, how much do you agree with each of the following statements about this vendor?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Communicated proactively about delays or changes
  • Maintained delivery or service reliability
  • Offered flexible payment or contract terms
  • Kept pricing stable and predictable
  • Provided responsive customer or technical support
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도필수

How did this vendor's overall performance during pandemic disruptions compare to your expectations?

척도: 110
최소:Performed far below expectations최대:Performed far above expectations
Q05
객관식

Which of these pandemic-era changes with this vendor has your organization kept in place?

  • Remote or virtual onboarding and sales calls
  • Digital ordering or invoicing tools
  • Contactless or flexible delivery options
  • Self-service support portals
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When deciding whether to continue working with this vendor through pandemic disruptions, which factors mattered most and which mattered least?

  • Price stability during shortages
  • Delivery speed and reliability
  • Proactive communication about disruptions
  • Ease of digital or online ordering
  • Dedicated account support
  • Flexible payment or contract terms
  • Consistent product or service quality
  • Willingness to adjust order volumes on short notice
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Mattered most최악:Mattered least
Q07
점수 배분필수

Thinking about your decision to keep working with this vendor, distribute 100 points across the factors below based on how much weight each one carried.

  • Cost or pricing
  • Reliability of supply
  • Communication quality
  • Flexibility of terms
  • Digital or self-service capabilities
  • Personal relationship with rep
100점 배분
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the single most memorable moment in this vendor relationship during the pandemic — anchor on the overall relationship-change rating the respondent gave earlier and ask them to walk through a specific incident (a delay, a shortage, a communication failure or a standout save) rather than a general impression. If they said the relationship worsened, probe exactly what happened and whether it was ever repaired; if it improved, probe what the vendor did differently and whether that behavior has continued since. Push for concrete details: dates, what was promised, what was delivered.

Q09
의견 척도필수

Based on your experience during the pandemic, how likely are you to recommend this vendor to another business facing similar disruptions?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
객관식

What is the approximate size of your organization?

  • 1-10 employees
  • 11-50 employees
  • 51-200 employees
  • 201-1,000 employees
  • 1,000+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role in decisions about this vendor?

  • Procurement or purchasing
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • Executive or ownership
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which industry best describes your organization?

  • Manufacturing
  • Retail or e-commerce
  • Healthcare
  • Professional or financial services
  • Construction
  • Technology
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing this. Your responses will be combined with others to help us understand which vendor behaviors built trust under pressure and which changes are worth keeping for good.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the single most memorable moment in the vendor relationship, going beyond a static rating to the specific incident that built or broke trust
  • Uses a constant-sum exercise and max-diff question to force tradeoffs on what actually drove the decision to keep or drop a vendor, rather than relying on agreement scales alone
  • Combines a matrix of pandemic-specific vendor behaviors (reliability, communication, pricing, flexibility) with a direct before/after comparison and a recommend-likelihood score for a full performance picture
  • Captures which pandemic-era changes (pricing terms, communication cadence, flexibility) have actually stuck, plus firmographic and role context to segment findings by company size, industry, and buying role

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.