모든 템플릿

Dark Pattern Acceptability & Transparency Trust Survey

Measures consumer reactions to common dark-pattern design tactics and transparency preferences, providing actionable data on trust drivers for UX and product teams.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 23개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for your interest in this study. This survey explores your recent online experiences, reactions to common website and app design practices, and your transparency preferences. It takes approximately 7–10 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time without consequence. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, will be anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for research purposes.

Q02
객관식

In the past 30 days, have you used any websites or apps to shop, book, or start or modify a subscription?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
메시지

The following scenarios describe common design practices you may encounter online. Please read each one carefully and rate how acceptable you find it.

Q04
객관식

Which of the following transparency features matter most to you when using websites or apps? Select all that apply.

  • Clear total price shown upfront
  • Easy cancellation in one or two steps
  • Plain-language data use summary
  • Consent toggles set to off by default
  • No auto-added items in cart
  • Prominent labels for ads or sponsored content
  • Change log for pricing or policy updates
  • Other (please specify in the next question)
Q05
장문형

Describe a recent time when a website or app influenced your choice in a way you found concerning or unclear. What happened, and how did you respond?

Q06
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q07
메시지

Thank you for your time — your input helps inform the design of clearer, more trustworthy online experiences. You may now close this survey.

Q08
객관식

Which of the following types of websites or apps have you used in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • Retail or marketplace websites
  • Mobile shopping apps
  • Food delivery apps
  • Travel or ticket booking sites
  • Streaming or media subscriptions
  • Social media shops
  • Utilities, bill pay, or banking apps
  • Other
Q09
의견 척도

Imagine you are shopping online. A product page shows a 10-minute countdown timer, after which a discount will no longer be available. How acceptable do you find this design practice?

척도: 17
최소:Completely unacceptable최대:Completely acceptable
Q10
장문형

If you selected 'Other' above, please describe the transparency feature you value.

Q11
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about persuasive design practices or transparency in your online experiences. Our AI moderator may ask a follow-up question to better understand your perspective.

Q12
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
의견 척도

In the past 30 days, how often did you encounter a website or app design that felt misleading or manipulative (e.g., hidden fees, hard-to-cancel subscriptions, urgency messages)?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very frequently
Q14
의견 척도

Imagine you are completing an online purchase. Additional fees (e.g., service charges or handling fees) appear for the first time on the final checkout step. How acceptable do you find this design practice?

척도: 17
최소:Completely unacceptable최대:Completely acceptable
Q15
의견 척도

To what extent do clear, transparent practices influence your trust in a brand?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all최대:To a very great extent
Q16
장문형

If you selected 'Prefer to self-describe' above, please specify your gender.

Q17
의견 척도

Imagine you are about to check out online. An add-on product (e.g., extended warranty or accessory) has been pre-selected in your cart, increasing the total unless you remove it. How acceptable do you find this design practice?

척도: 17
최소:Completely unacceptable최대:Completely acceptable
Q18
순위 매기기

When choosing which brand or website to purchase from, rank the following factors from most important (1) to least important (5).

  1. Price and value for money
  2. Product or service quality
  3. Ease of use
  4. Transparency and clarity of information
  5. Brand reputation and trustworthiness
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q19
드롭다운

In which region do you currently live?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • Asia
  • Africa
  • Oceania
  • Middle East
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

Thinking about the three scenarios you just rated, to what extent would encountering these practices reduce your likelihood of completing a purchase?

척도: 17
최소:Would not reduce it at all최대:Would definitely stop me from purchasing
Q21
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
순위 매기기

Please rank the following design practices from most concerning (1) to least concerning (6).

  1. Fees shown only at final checkout
  2. Hard-to-find unsubscribe or cancel steps
  3. Countdown timers or urgent messaging
  4. Low-stock or scarcity claims
  5. Pre-selected add-ons
  6. Ambiguous or unclear buttons
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q23
드롭다운

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Unemployed and looking for work
  • Student
  • Retired
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes three concrete dark-pattern scenarios (countdown timers, hidden fees, forced add-on defaults) rated on opinion scales, giving quantifiable acceptability data rather than generic satisfaction questions
  • Includes ranking exercises for both 'most concerning design practices' and 'purchase-decision factors', producing prioritized trust drivers instead of flat averages
  • Follows up automatically with an AI-moderated interview that probes the reasoning behind each respondent's ratings, surfacing the 'why' behind the scores
  • Captures self-described transparency preferences via open-text plus full demographic segmentation (age, region, education, employment) for cross-cut analysis

SurveySparrow

Product Design Survey Questionnaire | For Market Research

This is a fielding-ready generic product design/UX feedback questionnaire aimed at market research teams, not a dark-pattern or transparency-trust specific instrument. It's a reasonable adjacent template for product teams gathering general design feedback, but it doesn't address manipulative-design acceptability or trust-in-transparency questions directly.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use, fieldable template built for product/UX design feedback
  • SurveySparrow's conversational survey format may improve completion rates
  • Positioned specifically for market research use by product teams

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why respondents rate a design a certain way
  • No scenario-based dark-pattern testing (e.g., countdown timers, hidden fees, forced add-ons)
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt-level methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.