QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

LGBTQ+ Representation in Media Consumption Survey

Measures how LGBTQ+ audiences and allies encounter and judge queer representation in film, TV, and streaming — how often they see it, where, and whether it feels authentic — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into one specific portrayal that shaped their view. Built for media researchers, studios, and advocacy orgs.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 15개 · 약 8분
Q01
메시지

Hi! Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience with LGBTQ+ representation in TV, film, and streaming. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no wrong answers — this takes about 8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did you watch a show or movie that included LGBTQ+ characters or storylines?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • A few times a week
  • Almost daily
Q03
객관식필수

Where do you typically encounter LGBTQ+ representation in media?

  • Streaming services (e.g., Netflix, Hulu)
  • Broadcast or cable TV
  • Movies in theaters
  • Social media or short-form video
  • Podcasts
  • Books
Q04
매트릭스필수

Thinking about LGBTQ+ representation you've seen recently, how much do you agree with each statement?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Characters feel realistic and well-rounded, not just symbols
  • Storylines rely on stereotypes or tropes
  • Stories show everyday life and joy, not only struggle or trauma
  • Representation reflects diversity within the LGBTQ+ community (race, age, ability, etc.)
  • LGBTQ+ roles are cast with LGBTQ+ actors
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you judge whether LGBTQ+ representation is done well, which of these matters most and which matters least?

  • Authentic, well-developed characters
  • Diversity within LGBTQ+ identities shown
  • Avoiding stereotypes and tropes
  • Storylines centered on joy, not just hardship
  • Casting LGBTQ+ actors in LGBTQ+ roles
  • How often LGBTQ+ characters appear at all
  • Quality of the overall storyline
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q06
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with the current state of LGBTQ+ representation in mainstream media?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q07
객관식필수

Have you specifically sought out a show, movie, or creator because of its LGBTQ+ representation?

  • Yes, often
  • Yes, a few times
  • No, never
  • Not sure
Q08
의견 척도필수

How important is it to you that LGBTQ+ roles are played by LGBTQ+ actors?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not important at all최대:Extremely important
Q09
단문형

What's one show, movie, or piece of media you feel got LGBTQ+ representation especially right (or wrong)? A title is enough.

Q10
AI 인터뷰

If the respondent named a specific title, have them walk you through the scene, character, or storyline that stood out and why it felt authentic or fell flat — anchor on whether it avoided stereotypes and whether it showed joy versus only hardship. If they didn't name a title or said 'not sure', ask them to describe the most memorable LGBTQ+ character they've seen anywhere and probe the same authenticity questions.

Q11
메시지

One last section — a few quick demographic questions to help us understand patterns across different audiences. All are optional.

Q12
객관식

Which best describes your sexual orientation?

  • Lesbian
  • Gay
  • Bisexual
  • Pansexual
  • Asexual
  • Straight/heterosexual
  • Queer
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which best describes your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Transgender
  • Genderqueer or genderfluid
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
메시지

Thank you for sharing your perspective! Your answers will be combined with others to help creators and platforms understand what authentic, well-loved LGBTQ+ representation actually looks like.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond frequency and satisfaction ratings with an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through a specific scene or portrayal that shaped their view, surfacing depth static forms can't capture
  • Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force-rank what actually matters when judging representation quality, rather than relying on single agree/disagree items
  • Separates behavior (where and how often representation is encountered) from evaluation (authenticity, casting importance, satisfaction) across dedicated question types, then ties it together with an auto-generated report
  • Keeps demographic questions (orientation, gender identity, age) at the end with clear framing, and every AI probe/prompt is transparent and reviewable rather than a black box

QuestionPro

LGBT Media Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a direct topical match — a ready-made questionnaire on LGBT media representation with sample questions. It's a static form template rather than an adaptive interview, so all respondents get the same fixed question set regardless of their answers. Good for benchmarking standard question wording, less suited to probing individual stories in depth.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for the LGBT media representation topic, so questions are pre-validated for relevance
  • Provided as a sample questionnaire, making it easy to preview and adapt wording quickly

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up, so it can't dig deeper when a respondent mentions a specific show or scene
  • No voice interview option or screen-share task capability
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Jotform

Media Consumption Survey Form Template

This is a general-purpose media consumption survey, not specific to LGBTQ+ representation, so it would need substantial customization to fit this use case. It's a static, editable form builder template rather than a fielding-ready LGBTQ+ representation study. Useful mainly as a starting shell for basic media habit questions.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
  • Covers general media consumption habits that could be adapted as a base structure

아쉬운 점

  • Not tailored to LGBTQ+ representation at all — lacks any built-in questions on authenticity, casting, or queer visibility
  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice option
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기