QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Employee Satisfaction and Retention Pulse Survey

Tracks overall staff satisfaction, satisfaction across key workplace dimensions, and early flight-risk signals, then uses an AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific reasons behind low scores or turnover intent. Built for HR and people teams running quarterly or annual pulse checks.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes for this check-in. We want an honest read on how work is going for you — your answers are used to improve day-to-day experience, not to evaluate you individually. About 5 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this company as a good place to work to a friend or former colleague?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q03
매트릭스필수

How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your job right now?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Workload and work-life balance
  • Recognition for your contributions
  • Opportunities for growth and development
  • Communication from leadership
  • Compensation and benefits
열: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q04
평점 척도필수

How would you rate the support you receive from your direct manager?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q05
객관식필수

In the next 6 months, how likely are you to look for a job outside this company?

  • Not at all likely
  • Slightly likely
  • Somewhat likely
  • Very likely
  • Already looking
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these would do the most, and the least, to improve your day-to-day experience at work?

  • Higher pay or bonuses
  • More flexible work arrangements
  • Clearer career growth paths
  • Better recognition for good work
  • More manageable workload
  • Stronger leadership communication
  • More learning and development opportunities
  • Better benefits (health, retirement, etc.)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would improve my experience the most최악:Would improve my experience the least
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Explore the specific reasons behind the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their job-search intent. If the score was low or they indicated they're likely to look elsewhere, probe for a concrete incident, team dynamic, or recurring frustration, and what would realistically need to change to keep them. If the score was high, identify what specifically is working well enough to sustain it. Anchor on their own words and examples rather than generic categories, and ask one natural follow-up if their answer is vague.

Q08
장문형

Is there anything else about your day-to-day experience at work you'd like leadership to know?

Q09
객관식

Which department do you primarily work in?

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
객관식

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1 to 3 years
  • 3 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Responses are aggregated into a companywide report, and any direct quotes shared with leadership are kept anonymous.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs standard satisfaction and retention-risk metrics (recommend score, dimension matrix, manager rating, intent-to-leave) with an AI follow-up interview that automatically digs into the specific reasons behind a low recommend score
  • Uses a max-diff exercise to prioritize which workplace factors would most improve day-to-day experience, giving HR teams a ranked action list instead of just averages
  • Includes an open-ended long-text question inviting any additional feedback leadership should hear, plus department and tenure questions for segmenting results
  • Closes with a transparent message telling respondents their answers are aggregated into a report, and the platform auto-generates that report and can add optional voice AI interviews for deeper qualitative follow-up

Jotform

Staff Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A static, customizable form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder rather than a purpose-built survey research tool. It covers standard satisfaction questions but relies on manual editing to add any retention-risk or open-ended probing items.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization of fields and layout
  • Broad library of form templates and integrations typical of Jotform's platform
  • Simple to embed or share as a standalone form

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only, no adaptive follow-up questioning based on a respondent's answers
  • No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis
  • No transparent prompt methodology since it's a form builder, not an AI interview platform

QuestionPro

Employee Satisfaction Survey Template

A pre-built survey template from an established employee-experience survey platform, covering common satisfaction dimensions. It's designed for one-way data collection with QuestionPro's own analytics, not adaptive conversational follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a mature survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Likely includes benchmarking or reporting dashboards typical of QuestionPro
  • Template is ready to field with minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to probe the 'why' behind low scores or turnover intent
  • No voice AI interview option for qualitative depth
  • No published transparent prompt methodology for how follow-up questions (if any) are generated

SurveyMonkey

Employee Satisfaction Survey Template

A widely-used, ready-to-send template from a major survey platform, well suited for quick quantitative pulse checks. It focuses on fixed-question satisfaction tracking rather than uncovering root causes through dynamic follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Fast to deploy given SurveyMonkey's broad name recognition and distribution tools
  • Likely includes standard analytics and comparison reporting
  • Simple, familiar respondent experience

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore reasons behind low satisfaction or flight-risk signals
  • No screen-share or guided task capability
  • No per-response quality scoring described

SurveySparrow

Company Satisfaction Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template that presents questions in a chat-like format, which can improve completion rates. However, it remains a fixed question set rather than a true adaptive AI interview that changes based on individual responses.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style UI likely to feel more engaging than a traditional form
  • Built for employee/company satisfaction use cases specifically
  • Part of a platform with mobile and multi-channel distribution

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is not the same as adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing on individual answers
  • No voice AI interview option mentioned
  • No transparent prompt-level methodology or automated quality scoring per response

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기