QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

End-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation

A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the End-of-Term Course Evaluation. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes and asks about your experience in this course during the current term. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. By continuing, you consent to participate.

Q02
객관식

What is the primary format of this course?

  • Lecture
  • Seminar
  • Lab/Studio
  • Online (synchronous)
  • Online (asynchronous)
  • Hybrid
Q03
의견 척도

The instructor explained concepts clearly.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도

How useful were the course materials (e.g., textbook, slides, readings) for learning key concepts?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q05
드롭다운

In the last 4 weeks, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on this course (including class time and independent study)?

  • Fewer than 3 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–9 hours
  • 10–14 hours
  • 15–19 hours
  • 20–24 hours
  • 25 or more hours
Q06
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with this course overall?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q07
장문형

What specific changes, if any, would most improve the teaching or course materials?

Q08
객관식

What is your current program level?

  • Undergraduate (lower division)
  • Undergraduate (upper division)
  • Graduate (Master's)
  • Graduate (Doctoral)
  • Professional/Continuing education
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve future course offerings.

Q10
드롭다운

How often did you attend scheduled class sessions this term?

  • Every session
  • Most sessions
  • About half
  • Rarely
  • Never
Q11
의견 척도

The instructor was well-prepared for class sessions.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q12
객관식

Which of the following resources did you use most often in the last 4 weeks? Select all that apply.

  • Textbook
  • Lecture slides
  • Recorded videos
  • Readings/articles
  • Practice problems/quizzes
  • Discussion boards
  • Lab manuals
  • Software/tools
  • Instructor notes
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
객관식

Compared with your expectations, the workload this term was…

  • Much lighter than expected
  • Slightly lighter than expected
  • About right
  • Slightly heavier than expected
  • Much heavier than expected
Q14
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend this course to a fellow student?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q15
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience in this course.

Q16
객관식

What is your current enrollment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Non-degree/Auditing
Q17
의견 척도

The instructor encouraged student questions and participation.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q18
의견 척도

How easy was it to access course materials (e.g., links, platforms, files)?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q19
의견 척도

The pace of the course this term was…

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Much too slow최대:Much too fast
Q20
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to learn more about your course experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q21
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–29
  • 30–39
  • 40–49
  • 50+
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

The instructor provided timely and helpful feedback on assignments.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
객관식

Which of the following best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
의견 척도

Overall, how effective was the instructor in this course?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q25
드롭다운

Where are you primarily located while taking this course?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
순위 매기기

Rank the following teaching methods from most helpful to least helpful for your learning.

  1. Live demonstrations
  2. Group discussions
  3. Problem-solving exercises
  4. Lectures
  5. Peer review
  6. Real-world examples
드래그하여 순위 지정

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that lets students elaborate on their ratings in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice questions
  • Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on instructor clarity, preparation, feedback, and pace with a ranking question on teaching methods for richer, comparable data
  • Captures workload and material-usage patterns (hours per week, resource usage in last 4 weeks, access ease) alongside satisfaction and NPS-style recommendation questions
  • Pairs quantitative scoring with two open-text questions and an AI interview, then auto-generates a report — with a free tier and $50/mo Business plan (no academic-only tier)

Jotform

Student Course Evaluation Form Template

A static, drag-and-drop form template covering standard course/instructor rating fields. It's built for quick deployment and customization within Jotform's broader form-builder ecosystem, but it doesn't dynamically follow up on student responses. Reporting is limited to Jotform's standard form-response views rather than an automated evaluation report.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's wider app/payment/notification ecosystem
  • Quick to deploy for basic end-of-term feedback collection

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open responses
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published methodology for automated per-response quality scoring

QuestionPro

Course evaluation & improvement survey questions + Sample questionnaire template

This page reads more as a guide with sample survey questions and a downloadable questionnaire than a ready-to-field interactive template. It's useful as a question-bank reference for building a course evaluation survey, but it doesn't demonstrate a live adaptive experience. Actual fielding would require assembling and configuring the questions within QuestionPro's survey platform.

잘하는 점

  • Broad sample question bank covering multiple course-evaluation dimensions
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics tools
  • Useful as a reference/starting point for drafting evaluation questions

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a question list/guide rather than a fielding-ready adaptive template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent, published AI-prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

A standard static survey template aimed at training/course evaluation, backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics dashboards. It covers typical satisfaction and effectiveness questions but relies on fixed question flows rather than conversational follow-up. Framed generally for 'training' evaluation rather than specifically for higher-education instructor/course review.

잘하는 점

  • Mature survey platform with established analytics and benchmarking
  • Simple, familiar template structure for quick setup
  • Wide integration options within SurveyMonkey's ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on student answers
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task options
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

SurveySparrow

Sample Course Evaluation Form Template | Collect Instructor Feedback

SurveySparrow's template uses its signature conversational, chat-style form UI, which can feel more engaging than a static grid of questions. However, this conversational styling is a fixed-script presentation layer, not an adaptive interview that reasons about individual answers. It's positioned as a general instructor-feedback template rather than one built for detailed workload/pace analysis with AI-generated reporting.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style presentation that may improve completion rates
  • Mobile-friendly form design typical of SurveySparrow templates
  • Established survey platform with reporting dashboards

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task functionality
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or disclosed AI methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기