QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Presentation Peer Feedback and Skill-Building Survey

Gathers structured, behavior-specific feedback from colleagues who watched a presentation — covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A — plus a trade-off ranking of what most needs work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that stood out, turning vague 'good job' feedback into a concrete example the presenter can act on.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for giving feedback on a colleague's presentation! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest input helps them grow — this takes about 5 minutes and your specific answers matter more than being nice.

Q02
단문형필수

Which presentation are you giving feedback on? (Title, topic, or date)

Q03
의견 척도필수

How clear was the core message or main takeaway of the presentation?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Confusing, I couldn't identify one최대:Crystal clear from start to finish
Q04
매트릭스필수

Rate the presenter on each of these specific elements.

5개 행 × 4개 열
  • Structure & flow (logical order, clear transitions)
  • Slide design & visual clarity
  • Delivery style, vocal tone & confidence
  • Engagement with the audience (eye contact, questions, energy)
  • Time management & pacing
열: Needs significant work · Needs some improvement · Solid · Excellent
Q05
평점 척도필수

How well did the presenter handle questions from the audience?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Struggled to answer최대:Handled every question with ease
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Of these areas, which most needs improvement next time, and which is least urgent?

  • Clarity of the core message
  • Slide design and visuals
  • Delivery confidence and vocal tone
  • Pacing and time management
  • Audience engagement and energy
  • Handling of Q&A
  • Storytelling and structure
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most needs improvement최악:Least needs improvement
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this presenter for a similarly high-stakes presentation in the future?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to describe one specific moment from the presentation that best illustrates their top-priority improvement area from the trade-off ranking — what happened, what the presenter could have done differently, and what impact it had on the audience. Also have them describe the single strongest moment of the presentation and why it worked. If they give only vague praise or vague criticism, push for a concrete example (a slide, a sentence, a question) rather than a general impression.

Q09
장문형

If you could give the presenter one piece of advice to apply before their next presentation, what would it be?

Q10
객관식

What's your working relationship to the presenter?

  • Direct teammate
  • Cross-functional colleague
  • Manager or leadership
  • External stakeholder or client
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Responses across reviewers are combined into a private coaching summary for the presenter, focused on specific, actionable next steps.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix rating covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A handling in one structured block, plus a trade-off max-diff ranking to force prioritization of what needs work most
  • Pairs a long-text advice question with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to describe one specific moment from the presentation, turning vague 'good job' comments into a concrete, actionable example
  • Captures relationship-to-presenter context so feedback can be weighted appropriately, and closes with a recommend-likelihood scale for a quick directional read
  • Every question is a transparent, fixed prompt with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report, so the presenter gets a usable summary without manual tallying

Jotform

Presentation Peer Feedback Form Template

A ready-to-use, static form builder template for collecting peer feedback on a presentation. It's fielding-ready and customizable with Jotform's drag-and-drop editor, but the questions are fixed once published — there's no mechanism to dig deeper into a specific answer. Good for quick deployment, weaker for extracting concrete behavioral detail.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template within Jotform's established form builder ecosystem
  • Easy to customize fields and branding without technical setup
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader suite (e.g., PDF reports, notifications)

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up — every respondent answers the same static questions regardless of their input
  • No voice interview option or guided task/screen-share capability
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses; analysis is manual or via basic form analytics

Typeform

Presentation Peer Feedback Form

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time template well-suited to Typeform's polished UX for peer feedback collection. It's a static question flow, though — engaging presentation, but no logic that probes into a specific vague answer to get a concrete example. Best for lightweight, quick-turnaround feedback rather than deep behavioral insight.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational UI that tends to improve completion rates
  • Simple to launch and share without technical setup
  • Established template designed specifically for presentation peer feedback

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview to clarify or deepen a vague response
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task option
  • No transparent, per-response quality scoring or automated report generation

SurveyMonkey

Workplace Peer Feedback Template

A general workplace peer feedback template rather than one built specifically around presentations, so questions on visuals, pacing, or Q&A handling would need manual customization. It's a solid, fielding-ready starting point backed by SurveyMonkey's analytics, but remains a static questionnaire with no interview-style probing.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey analytics and reporting dashboard
  • Broad workplace peer feedback focus makes it adaptable to multiple review contexts
  • Fielding-ready with minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • Not presentation-specific out of the box — lacks built-in clarity/delivery/visuals/pacing structure
  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview to extract a specific concrete example
  • No automated per-response quality scoring; reporting is aggregate rather than interview-driven

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기