Internal Tools & Workflow Usability Assessment
Measures employee-perceived usability, reliability, and efficiency of internal tools and workflows. Use with cross-functional teams to identify friction points and prioritize improvements.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which of the following internal tools have you actively used in the past 4 weeks? Select all that apply.
- CRM or customer database
- Ticketing/helpdesk system
- Finance/ERP
- Custom admin portal
- Data analytics/dashboard
- Document/file storage
- Automation scripts/ETL
- Scheduling/workforce management
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how easy or difficult are the internal tools you use to complete your work?
How would you rate the overall reliability of the internal tools you use?
Please rank the following potential improvements by how much they would improve your daily work. Drag the most impactful to the top.
- Faster page loads
- Fewer clicks for common tasks
- Better search and filtering
- Clearer error messages and guidance
- Stronger integrations between systems
- Role-based defaults and templates
What is the single biggest pain point in your current tools or workflows that you would most like to see addressed?
Which department or function best describes your primary team?
- Customer Support
- Operations
- Sales
- Finance
- Engineering
- Product
- Marketing
- HR/People
- IT/Security
- Legal
- Other (please specify)
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback directly informs how we prioritize tool and workflow improvements. Results will be reviewed in aggregate and shared with leadership.
In a typical week, how often do you use the internal tool you rely on most?
- Several times per hour
- About once per hour
- A few times per day
- About once per day
- A few times per week
- About once per week or less
How easy or difficult is it to look up or enter data in internal tools?
On a typical workday, approximately how much time do you lose due to tool or workflow friction?
- Less than 10 minutes
- 10–30 minutes
- 30–60 minutes
- 1–2 hours
- More than 2 hours
When I encounter a problem with an internal tool, I know where to get help.
Please describe one task or workflow that has felt especially smooth or well-designed recently.
What is your role level?
- Individual contributor
- Team lead
- Manager
- Director
- VP or above
- Other
How easy or difficult is it to run reports or export data?
In a typical workday, how often do you need to switch between multiple tools to complete a single task?
Changes to internal tools are communicated clearly before they happen.
Based on your responses, we'd like to understand more about your experience with internal tools and workflows. Please share your thoughts and our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
How long have you been with the company?
- Less than 3 months
- 3–11 months
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6+ years
How easy or difficult is it to complete approvals or multi-step workflows?
Available training materials and documentation help me use internal tools effectively.
What is your primary work location?
- North America
- Latin America
- Europe
- Middle East & Africa
- Asia
- Oceania
How easy or difficult is it to collaborate with colleagues using internal tools?
Where do you encounter the most friction when using internal tools? Select all that apply.
- Navigation/menus
- Search/findability
- Data validation or form errors
- Permissions or access blocks
- System speed/latency
- Integrations between tools
- Reporting/export formatting
- Inconsistent layouts across tools
- Mobile or browser compatibility
- Other (please specify)
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a single usability score by separately measuring ease of data entry, reporting, approvals, and collaboration, so friction can be pinpointed by workflow stage rather than inferred from one composite metric.
- Includes a ranking exercise so employees prioritize which fixes (not just which problems) would improve their day-to-day work, giving teams an actionable improvement backlog.
- Pairs open-text prompts on biggest pain points and smoothest workflows with an adaptive AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper into whatever each respondent flags, instead of stopping at a fixed question set.
- Segments results by department, role level, tenure, and work location, making it straightforward to see whether friction is company-wide or concentrated in specific teams or experience levels.
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey TemplateThis is a standard implementation of the well-known System Usability Scale (SUS), a fixed 10-item questionnaire for scoring perceived usability. It's a ready-to-field template built on QuestionPro's established survey platform, but it's designed for a single standardized usability score rather than a broad diagnostic of internal tool friction.
잘하는 점
- Uses the widely validated SUS methodology, which allows benchmarking against known industry norms
- Ready to field quickly on an established enterprise survey platform
- Simple, well-understood scoring model that's easy to explain to stakeholders
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a respondent rated something poorly
- No voice AI interview or guided task/screen-share option to observe actual tool usage
- Focused narrowly on a single usability score rather than reliability, collaboration, or workflow-specific friction
Typeform
System Usability Survey TemplateA conversational, Typeform-styled version of a usability survey, aimed at capturing general product or tool usability perceptions. It's a fielding-ready template with Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time interface, but like other SUS-style forms it centers on a fixed question flow rather than open-ended discovery.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational interface that tends to keep respondent engagement high
- Easy to customize branding and question wording within Typeform's builder
- Mobile-friendly format suited to quick employee check-ins
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questions — every respondent sees the same fixed sequence
- No mechanism for guided tasks, screen share, or automated per-response quality scoring
- No transparent, publishable methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.