Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Employee Performance Review & Growth Opportunities Survey
Measures how employees experience performance reviews, career conversations, and growth opportunities — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific stretch assignments, mentorship moments, or blockers behind their advancement ratings. Built for HR and people leaders benchmarking review quality and career pathing across teams.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
의견 척도필수
How clear were the performance expectations set for your role in your most recent review cycle?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear
Q03
매트릭스필수
Thinking about your most recent performance review, how much do you agree with each statement?
4개 행 × 5개 열
- My manager gave me specific, actionable feedback I could act on
- I understood exactly how my performance rating was determined
- I received recognition proportional to my contributions
- I was given a clear path for how to advance to the next level
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
객관식필수
In the last 90 days, has your manager had a dedicated conversation with you about your career path?
- Yes, a substantive conversation
- Yes, but only briefly
- No, not in the last 90 days
- I'm not sure
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these would do the most to support your growth over the next year?
- Formal training or certifications
- Mentorship from senior leaders
- Stretch project assignments
- Clearer promotion criteria
- Cross-team rotation opportunities
- Structured leadership coaching
- Greater day-to-day autonomy
- More frequent recognition
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most valuable to my growth최악:Least valuable to my growth
Q06
점수 배분필수
If you could redesign your team's development budget, how would you split 100 points across these investment areas?
- Formal training programs
- One-on-one coaching
- Job rotation or stretch assignments
- Mentorship programs
- Tuition or certification reimbursement
100점 배분
Q07
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to still be working here in 12 months?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
장문형
What is one skill you'd like to develop in the next year that isn't currently part of your role?
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Probe the respondent's growth opportunity ratings and career conversation experience: ask for a specific recent example of a stretch assignment, mentorship moment, or promotion conversation (or the lack of one), what got in the way if they feel stuck, and what a meaningful next step in their growth would concretely look like. If they rated advancement clarity low, dig into exactly which criteria feel ambiguous and why.
Q10
드롭다운
Which department do you work in?
- Sales
- Marketing
- Engineering/Product
- Operations
- Customer Support
- Finance/HR
- Other (Template note: replace with your org's department list before launching.)
- Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식
How long have you been with the company?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- 5+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Your responses will be combined anonymously with your team's to shape training investments, promotion criteria, and manager coaching — no individual answers are shared with your manager.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific stretch assignments, mentorship moments, and blockers behind each employee's growth and advancement ratings, not just static ratings
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale, matrix, max-diff, constant sum) with open-ended and adaptive AI questioning to explain the 'why' behind scores like manager conversation frequency and retention likelihood
- Uses a constant-sum and max-diff pairing to force-rank development priorities and budget tradeoffs, giving HR teams clearer prioritization data than single-question ratings
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean HR and people leaders can benchmark review quality and career pathing across teams without manual analysis
QuestionPro
Short Employee Performance Review SurveyThis is a fielding-ready static survey template covering performance review and growth opportunity topics, directly comparable in subject matter to ours. It relies on fixed question sets without any mechanism to dig deeper into individual responses. Good for quick benchmarking but limited for understanding the specific reasons behind ratings.
잘하는 점
- Directly targets the same topic (performance review and growth opportunities)
- Likely quick to deploy given QuestionPro's template library format
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type support
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why an employee rated growth opportunities low or high
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No published methodology on question design or scoring transparency
SurveyMonkey
Employee Performance Survey TemplateA standard static employee performance survey template from a major survey platform, relevant to the same use case. It's designed for straightforward fielding rather than conversational depth. Useful for basic pulse-style performance data but not for uncovering the specifics behind advancement or mentorship experiences.
잘하는 점
- Well-known, established platform with reliable survey distribution
- Likely offers customizable question banks for performance topics
- Simple to deploy for HR teams already using SurveyMonkey
아쉬운 점
- Lacks any adaptive AI interview to explore the story behind a rating
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated growth-focused reports
- Static question format only, no voice AI or guided task capability
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.