QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey

Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback about your direct supervisor. Your responses help identify what's working and what could improve. This is confidential and takes about 5 minutes.

Q02
매트릭스필수

Thinking about the last few months, how much do you agree with each statement about your supervisor?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Communicates expectations clearly
  • Gives constructive feedback on my work
  • Treats team members fairly
  • Supports my professional development
  • Recognizes good work when it happens
  • 외 1개
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective is your supervisor at helping you do your job well?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did your supervisor give you specific feedback on your work?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • About weekly
  • Almost daily
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

If your supervisor could only improve in one area, which would matter most — and which matters least right now?

  • Clearer communication of goals and priorities
  • More timely or constructive feedback
  • Fairer distribution of workload
  • Better conflict resolution
  • More recognition for good work
  • Being more available/responsive
  • Stronger technical or job guidance
  • More support for career growth
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important to improve최악:Least important to improve
Q06
평점 척도필수

How likely would you be to recommend your supervisor's management style to a peer joining the team?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall effectiveness score by anchoring on one specific recent interaction with their supervisor — what happened, what the supervisor did or didn't do, and how it affected the respondent's work. If the score was very low (0-3), explore whether it reflects a pattern or a single incident and what would need to change. If very high (9-10), ask what the supervisor does that other managers should copy.

Q08
장문형

Is there anything specific you'd like your supervisor to start, stop, or keep doing?

Q09
객관식

How long have you reported to this supervisor?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
단문형

What team or department are you part of? (Optional — helps us spot patterns, not identify you.)

Q11
메시지

Thank you for your candid feedback! Responses are aggregated into a coaching report for HR and leadership so patterns can be addressed without singling out individual comments.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs a quick quantitative pulse (matrix agreement statements, overall effectiveness rating, recommend-likelihood score) with an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning behind the respondent's effectiveness score, surfacing specific behaviors instead of a flat number.
  • Uses a max-diff question to force prioritization of the one area a supervisor should improve, avoiding vague 'everything is fine' feedback.
  • Includes an optional short-text department field and tenure question so HR can segment coaching reports by team or reporting length without over-collecting identifying data.
  • Opens and closes with plain-language chat messages that set expectations for anonymity/aggregation and confirm responses feed into a coaching report, which supports honest upward feedback.

Jotform

Internship Supervisor Evaluation Form Template

This is a static, fielding-ready form built specifically for interns to rate internship supervisors, so its audience is narrower than general HR/people-manager evaluation cycles. It's easy to deploy and customize via Jotform's form builder, but it's a fixed question set rather than a conversational, adaptive survey.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for the internship-supervisor relationship, which may better match that specific niche
  • Backed by Jotform's mature drag-and-drop form builder and integrations
  • Likely free or low-cost to start given Jotform's general pricing model

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed rating/checkbox questions with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into the reasoning behind a score
  • No voice AI interview option or automated per-response quality scoring
  • Built for internship contexts specifically, not general upward-feedback or 360 manager review cycles

QuestionPro

21 Employee Feedback Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This page is primarily a guide/article listing sample supervisor and employee feedback questions rather than a single ready-to-field template, so setup work is needed to turn it into an actual survey. It does offer breadth of question ideas across HR feedback topics, useful as reference material.

잘하는 점

  • Broad question bank covering multiple HR feedback themes beyond just supervisor evaluation
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics tooling
  • Useful as a question-writing reference for teams building their own instrument

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a blog-style question list/guide, not a single fielding-ready survey template
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI to follow up on individual responses
  • No visible automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Sample Supervisor Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, conversational-style form template focused on supervisor evaluation, aligned with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It's fielding-ready out of the box but relies on fixed question flows rather than dynamic follow-up based on individual answers.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style UI that can feel more approachable than a traditional form
  • Ready to deploy quickly without much configuration
  • Part of a broader SurveySparrow template library for HR use cases

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind ratings
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency

Typeform

Supervisor Evaluation Form Template

A polished, fielding-ready one-question-at-a-time form for supervisor evaluation, well suited to Typeform's clean UX. It captures structured ratings and open text but does not adapt its questioning based on what a respondent just said.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, well-designed one-question-at-a-time interface known for good completion rates
  • Easy to customize branding and question wording within Typeform's editor
  • Simple to launch quickly for HR teams already using Typeform

아쉬운 점

  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI probing into individual answers
  • No voice AI interview mode or guided task/screen-share capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기