QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Bank Customer Service Request Resolution Survey

Captures how customers experienced a recent request to their bank — the channel used, whether the issue was resolved, and how the interaction felt — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment satisfaction rose or fell. Built for banks and credit unions tracking service quality after calls, chats, branch visits, or app contacts.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a moment to share your recent experience contacting us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 7 minutes and helps us fix what's not working.

Q02
객관식필수

Which channel did you use for your most recent contact with us?

  • Phone call
  • Live chat
  • In-branch visit
  • Mobile app
  • Email
  • Social media
Q03
객관식필수

What best describes the reason for that contact?

  • Account access or login issue
  • Card issue (lost, stolen, or declined)
  • Dispute a transaction or report fraud
  • Loan or credit inquiry
  • Fee or billing question
  • Update account information
Q04
객관식필수

Was your issue resolved during that contact?

  • Yes, fully resolved
  • Yes, partially resolved
  • No, still unresolved
  • Still waiting on a callback or follow-up
Q05
의견 척도필수

How easy or difficult was it to get help from the right person?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q06
매트릭스필수

Thinking about the representative or system you dealt with, how much do you agree with each statement?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • The representative was knowledgeable about my issue
  • The representative was courteous and respectful
  • The representative explained things clearly
  • The wait time was reasonable
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with how your request was handled?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific moment that most shaped this customer's satisfaction score: what happened, what was said, and how it made them feel. If the issue was unresolved or they gave a low score, probe exactly what broke down (wait, handoffs, unclear answers, unmet promises) and what resolution would have satisfied them. If the score was high, find out what specifically the representative or channel did that made it feel effortless.

Q09
의견 척도필수

Based on this experience, how likely are you to recommend our bank to a friend or family member?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
객관식

How long have you been a customer with us?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your answers go directly to our service teams to fix breakdowns and recognize the reps and channels getting it right.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Purpose-built for banking and credit union service moments — covers channel used, contact reason, and resolution status specific to financial service interactions
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the exact moment satisfaction rose or fell, going beyond static satisfaction scores to uncover the 'why'
  • Combines opinion scales, a matrix on representative/system experience, and recommendation likelihood with automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports
  • Transparent prompts mean banks can see exactly how the AI is probing customers, supporting compliance and audit needs unique to financial institutions

SurveySparrow

Bank Customer Service Request Form Template

This is a bank-specific template, making it one of the closer comparisons for this use case. It appears to be a static, fielding-ready form rather than one with adaptive AI-driven follow-up questions. Good for capturing structured request data but likely limited in probing the emotional or moment-specific drivers of satisfaction.

잘하는 점

  • Banking-specific framing out of the box
  • Ready-to-field template requiring no build-out
  • Likely supports SurveySparrow's broader survey distribution and reporting tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into specific satisfaction-shaping moments
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology or transparent prompt logic since it's a static question set

Typeform

Free Customer Service Request Form Template

This is a general-purpose customer service request form, not tailored to banking or credit unions specifically. It's a fielding-ready template known for a clean, conversational form UI, but it's still a fixed question set rather than a dynamic interview. Useful for general intake but less suited to nuanced service-quality tracking.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational form-filling experience
  • Free and quick to deploy
  • Familiar Typeform ecosystem for logic branching within fixed question paths

아쉬운 점

  • Not banking-specific — lacks channel/resolution framing relevant to financial service reviews
  • No adaptive AI or voice AI interview capability to probe deeper on specific moments
  • No automated quality scoring or AI-generated qualitative reports

QuestionPro

Service Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a generic service evaluation questionnaire rather than a banking-specific survey — more of a broad sample question bank than a purpose-built, fielding-ready template. It covers general satisfaction and service quality dimensions but doesn't address channel-specific banking contact points like calls, chats, branch visits, or app use.

잘하는 점

  • Broad library of standard service-evaluation questions
  • Backed by an established survey platform with analytics tools
  • Flexible for adapting to multiple industries beyond banking

아쉬운 점

  • Not tailored to banking channels or resolution tracking
  • Static question format with no adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up
  • No mechanism for automated per-response quality scoring or moment-specific satisfaction analysis

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기