모든 템플릿

Retirement Housing Preferences & Trade-Off Priorities Survey

Uncovers which retirement housing features — cost, location, care access, privacy, community life — actually drive decisions, using trade-off exercises and price sensitivity questions instead of simple ratings. Built for senior living operators, developers, and planners, with an AI follow-up that probes what respondents would sacrifice to secure their top priority.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your thoughts on retirement housing! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right answers — we want to understand what matters most to you when weighing options. About 6-8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes where you are in planning a move to retirement housing?

  • Just starting to explore options
  • Actively researching communities
  • Touring or shortlisting specific places
  • Ready to decide within the next few months
  • Already decided or in the moving process
Q03
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

For each set, pick the feature that matters most to you and the one that matters least when choosing a retirement housing community.

  • Monthly cost and fees
  • Proximity to family and friends
  • On-site healthcare or nursing access
  • Size and privacy of living space
  • Maintenance-free living (no yard work or repairs)
  • Social activities and community events
  • Walkability to shops, dining, and services
  • Safety and security features
  • Pet-friendly policies
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q04
점수 배분필수

Imagine you have 100 points to split across these priorities based on how much weight each should carry in your decision. Allocate all 100 points however feels right.

  • Monthly cost and affordability
  • Location and proximity to family
  • Living space and privacy
  • Healthcare and support services
  • Social and recreational amenities
100점 배분
Q05
가격 민감도(Van Westendorp)필수

Now think about the monthly fee for a retirement housing community that fully meets your needs (rent plus standard services).

  • At what monthly fee would this community feel so inexpensive that you'd question the quality of care and amenities?
  • At what monthly fee would this community feel like a bargain — great value for the money?
  • At what monthly fee would you start to feel this community is expensive, though you'd still consider it?
  • At what monthly fee would this community be so expensive that you would not consider it at all?
Q06
매트릭스필수

How important is each of the following services when you picture your ideal retirement housing community?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • On-site medical or nursing staff
  • Housekeeping and home maintenance
  • Prepared meals or dining service
  • Transportation services
  • Fitness and wellness programs
  • 외 1개
: Not important · Somewhat important · Important · Very important · Essential
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to move into some form of retirement or senior housing within the next 12 months?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
객관식

Which type of retirement housing are you currently leaning toward, if any?

  • Independent living community
  • Assisted living community
  • Continuing care retirement community (CCRC)
  • Age-restricted (55+) single-family home
  • Multigenerational home with family
  • Staying in current home with modifications
  • Not sure yet
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore the real trade-off between cost and the feature the respondent ranked most important in the prioritization exercise. If healthcare access or proximity to family topped their list, ask what monthly fee increase they'd tolerate to secure it and what they'd cut from their budget to make it fit. If they're 'not sure yet' on housing type, probe what specific information or experience (a tour, a cost breakdown, a conversation with a resident) would help them decide.

Q10
객관식

What is your current living situation?

  • Own home outright
  • Own home with a mortgage
  • Rent
  • Live with family
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 55
  • 55-64
  • 65-74
  • 75-84
  • 85 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your approximate annual household income?

  • Under $50,000
  • $50,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000-$199,999
  • $200,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for sharing your priorities! Your answers will feed into a report that helps housing providers design communities and pricing that actually match what people like you value.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Uses trade-off exercises (MaxDiff and a constant-sum priority allocation) instead of simple ratings, so it measures what respondents would actually give up, not just what they claim to value
  • Includes a Van Westendorp price sensitivity question to pin down acceptable monthly fee ranges for retirement housing, not just a single willingness-to-pay ask
  • Has a dedicated AI follow-up interview that probes the specific trade-off between cost and each respondent's top-ranked feature, adapting its questions to prior answers
  • Combines quantitative structure (matrix importance ratings, opinion scale on moving likelihood, screening/demographic questions) with qualitative depth in one flow, then rolls everything into an auto-generated report

QuestionPro

Conjoint Analysis Survey Template + Sample Questionnaire

This is a fielding-ready conjoint analysis template specifically built around retirement housing feature trade-offs, making it the closest direct competitor to our template. It uses conjoint choice tasks to statistically model feature importance, which is methodologically rigorous but is a fixed, pre-scripted instrument rather than an interactive interview. There's no mechanism for the survey to adapt its questions based on an individual respondent's stated priorities.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for retirement housing conjoint trade-off analysis
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey/analytics platform
  • Sample questionnaire structure gives researchers a ready statistical framework

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual trade-offs in the respondent's own words
  • No voice interview or screen-share task option
  • No published transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

Jotform

Retirement Planning Questionnaire Form Template

This is a general retirement planning form (financial/lifestyle questionnaire) built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder rather than a research instrument focused on housing feature trade-offs. It's fielding-ready as a form but is not designed around conjoint-style prioritization or price sensitivity analysis. It reads more like an intake questionnaire than a decision-driver research survey.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize and deploy quickly via Jotform's form builder
  • Broad retirement planning scope covering multiple life topics
  • Integrates with Jotform's existing form ecosystem (payments, notifications, etc.)

아쉬운 점

  • No trade-off or price sensitivity methodology (no MaxDiff, constant-sum, or Van Westendorp questions)
  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
  • No automated response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report

Typeform

Housing Survey Form

This is a generic housing survey template, not specific to retirement or senior housing, so it would need substantial rebuilding to address care access, community life, or retirement-specific price sensitivity. It's a fielding-ready form on Typeform's conversational form platform, good for simple structured questions but not designed for trade-off research. Worth noting mainly as a general-purpose alternative rather than a direct competitor.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Quick to launch using Typeform's existing template
  • Flexible enough to be adapted for various housing-related audiences

아쉬운 점

  • Not tailored to retirement housing or senior-living decision drivers
  • No trade-off exercises, price sensitivity, or prioritization scoring built in
  • Static questions only, no adaptive AI interview, voice option, or automated report generation

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.