Social Media Content Consent & Comfort Survey
Explores how comfortable customers are when brands reshare their photos, tags, reviews, or comments in marketing — and what would make them more willing to say yes. Built for marketing, social, and legal teams shaping user-generated-content and permission policies, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment someone felt uneasy or declined.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 12 months, have you tagged, reviewed, or mentioned a brand on social media?
- Yes, more than once
- Yes, once
- No, never
- Not sure
Overall, how comfortable are you with brands resharing content you post publicly (photos, reviews, comments) without asking you each time?
How comfortable would you be with a brand doing each of the following with something you posted?
- Reposting your photo on their social account
- Using your review or comment in a paid ad
- Tagging your handle without asking first
- Quoting your words in a marketing email
- Featuring your content on their website
What would make you more willing to let a brand reuse your content? (Select all that apply)
- Being asked directly before each use
- Getting credit or a tag back
- Some form of compensation or discount
- Knowing exactly where it will appear
- Being able to revoke permission later
- Nothing — I'm fine either way
Rank these factors by how much they matter when deciding whether to give a brand permission to reuse your content.
- Getting credit/attribution
- Being compensated
- Understanding where it will be used
- Trusting the brand generally
- Ability to withdraw consent later
Have you ever asked a brand to remove or stop using your content?
- Yes, and they complied
- Yes, but they didn't comply
- No, never had to
- No, but I've considered it
Reconstruct the respondent's most vivid experience with brand consent around their social media content — ideally the moment they felt uncomfortable, declined, or asked for removal. Ask exactly what the brand did or didn't ask, how the request (if any) was worded, and what a better process would have looked like. If they've never had an issue, probe what a bad scenario would look like for them so we can spot risks before they happen.
Which method would you most prefer for a brand to get your consent before reusing content?
- A direct message or comment asking permission
- A checkbox at the time of posting/tagging
- An email or form request afterward
- No request needed if the content is public
- I would prefer they never reuse my content
If a brand has ever asked your permission before, how clear and easy to understand was that request?
Which social platforms do you use most often? (Select up to 3)
- TikTok
- X (Twitter)
- YouTube
- Other
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for sharing your perspective! Your answers will directly shape how we ask for and handle permission before reusing anyone's social media content.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a single consent question with a full comfort profile: an overall comfort scale plus a matrix rating how respondents feel about specific reuse scenarios (tagging, ads, reviews, etc.)
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's most vivid moment of discomfort or refusal, surfacing specific context static forms can't capture
- Captures what would actually increase willingness (multi-select drivers plus a ranked list of factors), giving marketing/legal teams prioritized, actionable levers rather than just yes/no consent
- Asks about past experience asking a brand to stop using content and rates how clear prior consent requests were, giving diagnostic data on current UGC process friction
SurveyMonkey
Social Media Consent Form TemplateThis is a static consent-capture form built to record a yes/no permission for using someone's social content, not a research instrument exploring comfort or hesitation. It's fielding-ready and easy to customize with SurveyMonkey's standard builder, but it treats consent as a one-time checkbox rather than a nuanced attitude to be understood.
잘하는 점
- Established, widely-used survey platform with simple template customization
- Purpose-built for legal/consent documentation rather than general feedback
- Quick to deploy for straightforward permission collection
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a specific respondent felt uneasy or declined
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative reports
- No voice AI interview option; limited to static question formats
Jotform
Social Media Content Submission Form TemplateThis is an operational submission form for collecting content (photos, captions, etc.) and associated usage rights, not an attitudinal survey about comfort with reuse. It's fielding-ready for intake workflows but doesn't investigate feelings, hesitation, or what conditions would change a respondent's willingness.
잘하는 점
- Supports file/media uploads alongside form fields, useful for actual content intake
- Drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
- Can double as a lightweight rights-release mechanism during submission
아쉬운 점
- No mechanism to explore the emotional or contextual nuance behind a consent decision
- No adaptive questioning, voice interview option, or automated response scoring
- Not designed to produce an analytical report on comfort trends or policy implications
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.