QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Mentor Program Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Measures how well a mentorship relationship is working for the mentee — guidance quality, meeting consistency, and career impact — with an AI follow-up that digs into a specific moment mentorship helped or fell short, revealing what to fix before the next matching cycle.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your mentorship experience! This helps us improve matching and support for everyone in the program. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how often have you and your mentor met?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • Monthly or more
  • Weekly or more
Q03
의견 척도필수

How well does your mentor understand your specific career goals?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Doesn't understand at all최대:Understands completely
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your mentor?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Gives me actionable, specific advice
  • Is accessible when I need to reach them
  • Challenges me to grow, not just reassures me
  • Follows through on commitments made in our sessions
  • Helps me build useful connections or visibility
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
순위 매기기

Rank these areas by how much your mentor has helped you in each so far.

  1. Technical or role-specific skills
  2. Career navigation and goal-setting
  3. Confidence and mindset
  4. Networking and visibility
  5. Work-life balance and wellbeing
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this mentorship program to a colleague?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
객관식필수

Overall, has this mentorship relationship met your expectations?

  • Far below expectations
  • Somewhat below
  • Met expectations
  • Somewhat above
  • Far exceeded expectations
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent conversation or piece of advice from their mentor that genuinely changed how they approached something at work. Get concrete details: what the advice was, what they did differently, and what the outcome was. If they rated the relationship as below expectations, instead probe the specific moment or pattern that caused disappointment and what they wish had happened instead. Anchor follow-ups on their meeting frequency and 'understands goals' answers.

Q09
장문형

What's one thing your mentor could do differently to make this relationship more valuable to you?

Q10
객관식

How long have you been in this mentoring relationship?

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1-3 months
  • 4-6 months
  • 7-12 months
  • Over a year
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role level?

  • Entry-level / individual contributor
  • Mid-level
  • Senior / staff
  • Manager or above
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That wraps things up — thank you for the honest feedback! Program coordinators will use these responses, alongside your mentor's, to strengthen matching and support going forward.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that asks the mentee to walk through one specific recent conversation or moment, surfacing concrete detail on what worked or fell short.
  • Combines structured measurement (meeting frequency, a goals-understanding opinion scale, a multi-statement agreement matrix, and a ranking of help areas) with open-ended reflection, so coordinators get both scorable data and narrative context.
  • Captures program-health signals like recommendation likelihood and whether expectations were met, alongside role level and relationship duration, so results can be segmented before the next matching cycle.
  • Ends with a clear thank-you and sets expectations that coordinators will review responses, plus a dedicated open text question on what the mentor could do differently.

Jotform

Mentor Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready, customizable form builder template for evaluating mentors, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop editor and integrations. It's a general-purpose form rather than a survey built specifically around mentee-reported career impact. No mention of adaptive follow-up questioning.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use, easily customizable form layout
  • Backed by Jotform's broad integration and form-logic ecosystem
  • Likely quick to deploy for basic mentor feedback collection

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specific incidents
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports evident
  • No transparent, published methodology or prompt logic behind the questions

Typeform

Mentor Evaluation Form Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time template well-suited to Typeform's polished UX for mentor feedback. It offers a pleasant respondent experience but appears to be a fixed question flow rather than one that adapts based on answers. Reporting is likely limited to Typeform's standard response summaries.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Easy to customize branding and question wording
  • Good completion rates typical of Typeform's UX design

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into a specific mentorship moment
  • No voice-based interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

QuestionPro

Non Profit Mentoring Programs Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a sample questionnaire and guide focused on non-profit mentoring programs rather than a plug-and-play fielding template, so setup work is likely required. It covers broad program-level survey question ideas, which is useful for question inspiration but not tailored to a single mentee's ongoing relationship depth.

잘하는 점

  • Provides example questions specifically framed for mentoring program context
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey analytics platform
  • Useful as a question-writing reference for program administrators

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a guide/sample questionnaire, not a ready-to-field interactive survey
  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
  • No transparent per-question methodology or automated quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기