QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Debate Performance Feedback Survey

Captures how judges, audience members, and competitors experienced a specific debate — argument quality, delivery, and persuasiveness — plus an AI follow-up that reconstructs the single moment that most shaped who 'won' the room. Built for debate coaches, tournament organizers, and educators running practice rounds or competitions.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this debate! Your feedback helps the debaters improve and helps organizers plan better rounds. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your role at this debate?

  • Judge
  • Audience member
  • Competitor / debater
  • Coach or mentor
  • Other
Q03
매트릭스필수

Rate the debate on each of the following, considering both sides overall:

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Argument clarity
  • Use of evidence
  • Quality of rebuttals
  • Delivery and stage presence
  • Time management
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q04
의견 척도필수

How persuasive did you find the case made by the side you believe won this debate?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not persuasive at all최대:Completely persuasive
Q05
평점 척도필수

Compared to other debates you've watched or judged, how would you rate this one overall?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Well below average최대:Well above average
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Thinking about the debaters in this round, which skills most need improvement and which are already strongest? Pick the best and worst from each set shown.

  • Argument structure and logic
  • Use of evidence and sources
  • Rebuttal timing and precision
  • Public speaking delivery
  • Cross-examination technique
  • Time management
  • Handling hostile or tough questions
  • Persuasive framing and rhetoric
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Strongest skill shown최악:Most in need of improvement
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the single moment in this debate that most shaped the respondent's view of who was more convincing — which speaker, which argument or rebuttal, and exactly what made it land or fall flat. If the respondent rated the debate as average or below on quality, probe what specifically was missing (structure, evidence, delivery, or engagement with the other side) rather than accepting a generic complaint.

Q08
의견 척도

How likely are you to attend or judge another debate in this series?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
장문형

Anything else you'd like the debaters or organizers to know — feedback, suggestions, or specific praise?

Q10
객관식

How would you describe your experience level with debate (as a participant, judge, or coach)?

  • New to debate
  • Some experience (a few rounds/events)
  • Experienced (many rounds/seasons)
  • Highly experienced (competitive or professional level)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

Thank you for your feedback! Responses are compiled into a summary report shared with the debaters and organizers to help sharpen arguments and delivery for next time.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated matrix rating block covering argument quality, delivery, and persuasiveness from multiple respondent types (judges, audience, competitors) in one flow
  • Features an AI follow-up interview question that reconstructs the single moment that most shaped who 'won' the room, going beyond static rating scales
  • Uses a max-diff question to identify which debater skills most need improvement, giving actionable coaching signal rather than just satisfaction scores
  • Auto-generates a summary report shared back with debaters and organizers, closing the feedback loop without manual compilation

SurveySparrow

Debate Platform Survey Form Template for Feedback

This is a genuinely debate-specific fielding-ready template, directly comparable to ours in subject matter. It appears built around standard rating/multiple-choice question types rather than adaptive interviewing. Good baseline option for teams wanting a quick static form rather than deeper qualitative reconstruction of key moments.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for debate feedback rather than generic event feedback
  • Likely quick to deploy with pre-set rating and multiple-choice questions
  • Part of a broader survey platform with standard reporting/export tools

아쉬운 점

  • No indication of adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe why a respondent felt a certain way
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for richer debate analysis
  • No published methodology on how responses are scored or weighted

Jotform

Create Free Event Feedback Forms - Event Feedback Form Templates

This is a generic event feedback template category page, not a debate- or competition-specific survey, so it would need heavy customization to capture argument quality, persuasiveness, or judge/audience/competitor role distinctions. It's useful mainly as a broad starting form-builder page rather than a ready-made debate tool. Best suited for organizers who want a general-purpose form and plan to build debate-specific questions from scratch.

잘하는 점

  • Large library of customizable form templates and drag-and-drop builder
  • Free tier available for basic event feedback collection
  • Familiar form-builder ecosystem with integrations

아쉬운 점

  • No debate-specific question set (argument quality, persuasiveness, role-based branching) out of the box
  • Static form fields only, no adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated performance report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기