모든 템플릿

Pre-Visit Psychiatric Evaluation Intake Questionnaire

A pre-appointment intake for mental health clinics that captures a patient's presenting concern, symptom frequency across common domains, functional impact, safety status, and treatment history before a first psychiatric visit. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs concrete recent examples behind the ratings and checks in sensitively on any safety responses. Not a substitute for crisis assessment.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes before your appointment. These questions help your provider understand what's going on before you meet, and there are no right or wrong answers — honesty helps most. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 6-8 minutes. This is not a crisis service: if you are in immediate danger, please contact emergency services or a crisis line right now instead of continuing.

Q02
장문형필수

In your own words, what's the main concern that brought you to seek this evaluation?

Q03
객관식필수

How long have you been dealing with this concern?

  • Less than 2 weeks
  • 2 weeks to 1 month
  • 1 to 6 months
  • 6 to 12 months
  • More than a year
  • This is a recurring issue I've dealt with before
Q04
매트릭스필수

Over the past two weeks, how often have you experienced each of the following?

8개 행 × 4개 열
  • Low mood or sadness
  • Feeling anxious or on edge
  • Irritability or anger
  • Trouble sleeping
  • Appetite or weight changes
  • 외 3개
: Not at all · Several days · More than half the days · Nearly every day
Q05
의견 척도필수

How much have these concerns interfered with your daily life (work, school, relationships, or self-care) in the last two weeks?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all최대:Completely unable to function
Q06
객관식필수

In the past two weeks, how often have you had thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way?

  • Not at all
  • Several days
  • More than half the days
  • Nearly every day
Q07
객관식

Are you currently taking any medication prescribed for a mental health condition?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q08
객관식

Which best describes your prior mental health treatment history?

  • No previous treatment
  • Outpatient therapy only
  • Medication only
  • Both therapy and medication
  • Inpatient or crisis-level care
  • Not sure / prefer not to specify
Q09
객관식

What are you hoping this evaluation leads to? Select all that apply.

  • A clearer understanding of what's going on
  • Medication options
  • Therapy or coping strategies
  • Support during a difficult life event
  • A formal diagnosis
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Explore the respondent's main presenting concern in depth: when it started, what triggered or worsened it, and what has changed in the last two weeks. If they indicated any thoughts of self-harm as occurring more than 'not at all', gently ask how they are keeping safe right now and clearly note that if they are in immediate danger they should contact emergency services or a crisis line rather than continue. Anchor follow-up on one or two concrete recent examples (a specific day, interaction, or event) rather than general feelings, and note any gap between how they described the problem in their own words and how they rated its severity.

Q11
객관식

What is your age range? (optional, for clinical context)

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your gender identity? (optional, for clinical context)

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which best describes your current living situation?

  • Live alone
  • Live with partner or spouse
  • Live with family
  • Live with roommates
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you for sharing this — your responses will be reviewed by your provider before your appointment to help focus your time together. If anything changes before then, especially around your safety, please reach out to a crisis line or emergency services right away.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Captures presenting concern, symptom frequency across common domains, functional impact, safety status, and treatment history in one structured pre-visit flow
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs concrete recent examples behind ratings and checks in sensitively on any safety-related responses, rather than leaving flagged answers unexplored
  • Uses transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring so clinicians receive a fuller, more consistent picture before the first visit
  • Closes with a clear message explaining that responses will be reviewed by the provider before the appointment, setting appropriate expectations for a clinical (not crisis) context

Jotform

Psychiatric Evaluation Form Template

A static, fielding-ready form template covering standard psychiatric evaluation fields that clinics can customize with Jotform's form builder. It's a fixed questionnaire rather than an interview, so all follow-up and clarification has to be done manually by staff. Good for quick deployment but offers no built-in mechanism to probe deeper on any given answer.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use template that can be deployed quickly without building from scratch
  • Customizable form fields and layout via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (e-signatures, conditional logic, notifications)

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to reconstruct concrete examples behind answers
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated clinical-ready reports

Typeform

Psychiatric Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style static form template for psychiatric evaluation intake, built on Typeform's one-question-at-a-time interface. It offers a smoother respondent experience than a traditional form but still relies on fixed questions with no dynamic probing of responses. Safety-related answers would need manual clinical review with no automated sensitive check-in built in.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, respondent-friendly conversational UI that may improve completion rates
  • Easy to customize question wording and branding within Typeform
  • Supports basic logic branching between questions

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview to explore concerns in depth
  • No automated sensitive check-in on safety-related responses
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated reports for clinicians

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.