모든 템플릿

Incident Response Postmortem & Communication Effectiveness Survey

Collects structured feedback from incident responders and stakeholders to evaluate response execution, communication quality, and accountability of follow-up actions. Use after any significant incident to identify process improvements.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Incident Postmortem Survey. This survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes and asks about your experience during a specific recent incident. Your responses are confidential, reported only in aggregate, and will be used to improve our response and communication processes. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we value your honest perspective.

Q02
객관식

What was your primary role during this incident?

  • Incident commander
  • Technical responder
  • Communications/PR
  • Customer support
  • Leadership/Executive
  • Stakeholder or observer
Q03
드롭다운

Approximately how long did it take from detection to the start of a coordinated response?

  • Under 5 minutes
  • 5–15 minutes
  • 16–30 minutes
  • 31–60 minutes
  • 1–2 hours
  • More than 2 hours
  • I don't know
Q04
의견 척도

How would you rate the timeliness of communications during the incident?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q05
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the timeliness of the post-incident review?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q06
객관식

Which single change would most improve incident communications next time?

  • Clearer audience owners
  • Preset update cadence
  • Single source of truth
  • Fewer channels
  • More status detail
  • More executive summaries
  • Automated stakeholder lists
  • Other (please specify)
Q07
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you'd like to share about this incident or our response process?

Q08
객관식

Which department or group are you part of?

  • Engineering
  • SRE/Operations
  • Security
  • Support
  • Product/PM
  • Communications/PR
  • Leadership/Executive
  • Other
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback directly informs our incident response improvements and will be reviewed by the postmortem team.

Q10
드롭다운

Which area was primarily impacted by this incident?

  • Customer-facing systems
  • Internal tools
  • Data/analytics
  • Infrastructure/network
  • Security
  • Compliance/regulatory
  • Other
Q11
객관식

Did the team follow a documented runbook during this incident?

  • Yes, fully followed
  • Partially followed
  • No, deviated from runbook
  • No runbook exists
Q12
의견 척도

How would you rate the clarity and accuracy of communications during the incident?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q13
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree that action items from this incident were clearly defined with accountable owners?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q14
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your experience a bit further. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions about the incident response and communication. Please respond in your own words.

Q15
드롭다운

How many years of experience do you have with incident response?

  • Under 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • 11+ years
Q16
장문형

If applicable, what is the name or ID of the incident you are referencing?

Q17
의견 척도

Overall, how effective were the corrective actions taken during this incident?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q18
의견 척도

How would you rate the frequency of stakeholder updates during this incident?

척도: 17
최소:Far too infrequent최대:Far too frequent
Q19
의견 척도

How confident are you that the identified actions will prevent a similar incident within the next 6 months?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Very confident
Q20
드롭다운

Which region best describes your primary working time zone?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other/Multiple
Q21
장문형

What were the top blockers or obstacles to achieving a faster resolution?

Q22
순위 매기기

Rank the following communication channels from most to least effective during this incident.

  1. Slack/Chat
  2. Email
  3. Incident tool/Timeline
  4. Video bridge
  5. Status page
  6. Phone/SMS
드래그하여 순위 지정

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured incident-execution questions (role, impacted area, detection-to-coordination timeline, runbook adherence) with dedicated ratings for communication timeliness, clarity, and update frequency
  • Includes a ranking question comparing communication channel effectiveness and opinion-scale items on action-item clarity and confidence in preventing recurrence
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended answers about blockers and improvement ideas rather than leaving them as static free-text
  • Closes with reflective open-text and segmentation questions (department, experience level, time zone) so QuestionPunk's auto-generated report can break down findings by stakeholder group

SurveyMonkey

Incident Report Form Template

This is a general-purpose incident report form for logging basic details of an event (what happened, when, who was involved) rather than a structured postmortem instrument. It's fielding-ready out of the box and benefits from SurveyMonkey's broader analytics and distribution tools, but it doesn't specifically address communication-quality assessment or follow-up accountability. Best suited as an initial incident intake form rather than a post-incident retrospective.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template usable immediately without customization
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and reporting dashboards
  • Customizable question set for basic incident logging

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended answers
  • No structured multi-dimensional rating of communication timeliness, clarity, and frequency
  • No published methodology or transparent prompt logic behind question design

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.