모든 템플릿

Reformulated Product Reactions: Protein and Fiber Claims Study

Measures how shoppers react when a familiar food product is reformulated with added protein or fiber claims — covering purchase intent, trust in the new claims, taste expectations, and price sensitivity. Built for brand and innovation teams testing packaging or recipe changes, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real tension between health claims and taste concerns behind the numbers.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 15개 · 약 8분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking part! We'd like your honest reactions to a recently reformulated food product with new protein and fiber claims. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 6-7 minutes, and there are no right or wrong answers.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how often have you purchased (Replace with Brand X's product line)?

  • Never
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • 4-6 times
  • More than 6 times
Q03
텍스트 하이라이트필수

Here is the updated packaging copy for the reformulated product. Please highlight the words or phrases that stand out to you the most, whether positively or negatively.

NOW WITH 20g PROTEIN AND 10g FIBER PER SERVING. Same great taste you love, reformulated to help you feel fuller, longer. No artificial sweeteners. (Template note: replace with your own product's actua…

Q04
의견 척도필수

After reading this updated packaging, how likely are you to buy this product the next time you shop?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q05
평점 척도

Based on the new claims, how do you expect this reformulated version to taste compared to the original?

범위: 15
최소:Much worse than original최대:Much better than original
Q06
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this reformulated product?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • This product's health claims feel trustworthy
  • Adding protein and fiber makes me worry it will taste worse
  • This product now feels healthier overall
  • The new claims justify paying a bit more
  • This still feels like the same brand I know
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

For a product like this, which claims matter most to you, and which matter least?

  • Added 20g protein per serving
  • Now contains 10g fiber per serving
  • Reduced sugar by 30%
  • Non-GMO ingredients
  • No artificial sweeteners
  • Same great taste, reformulated recipe
  • Lower sodium per serving
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
점수 배분필수

You have 100 points to distribute. Please allocate them based on how much each factor drives your decision to buy this product.

  • Taste
  • Protein content
  • Fiber content
  • Price
  • Brand trust
  • Packaging and claims
100점 배분
Q09
가격 민감도(Van Westendorp)필수

Thinking about the reformulated (Replace with product name), please answer with a specific price in mind.

  • At what price would this product be so cheap that you'd question its quality or the health claims?
  • At what price would this product be a bargain — a great buy for the money?
  • At what price would this product start to feel expensive, though you'd still consider buying it?
  • At what price would this product be so expensive that you would not consider buying it?
Q10
객관식필수

How likely are you to switch from your usual protein or fiber snack brand to try this reformulated product?

  • Very likely
  • Somewhat likely
  • Not sure yet
  • Somewhat unlikely
  • Very unlikely
Q11
AI 인터뷰

Explore the real tension between health claims and taste in the respondent's reaction to this reformulation: ask what specifically made them more or less interested after seeing the protein and fiber claims, and whether they actually believe the taste will hold up. If they rated purchase intent low, probe whether it's about taste doubts, price, distrust of the claims, or loyalty to the original recipe. If they rated it high, check whether that's genuine interest or just curiosity to try it once.

Q12
메시지

Almost done — just a couple of quick optional questions about you.

Q13
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식

Which best describes your current diet or eating pattern?

  • No specific diet
  • High-protein focused
  • Vegetarian
  • Vegan
  • Low-carb / keto
  • Gluten-free
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
메시지

Thank you for your feedback! Your responses, along with your AI follow-up conversation, will help our product and marketing teams decide how to finalize the claims and messaging on this reformulated product.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes the tension between health claims (protein/fiber) and taste concerns, going beyond static rating scales
  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale, rating, matrix, max-diff, constant sum, Van Westendorp pricing) with qualitative depth in one flow, so brand teams get both the 'what' and the 'why'
  • Uses a text-highlight task so respondents mark up the actual reformulated packaging copy, giving direct feedback on claim wording rather than abstract questions
  • Captures purchase intent, switch likelihood, and price sensitivity together with diet/demographic context, tailored specifically to reformulation and claims testing rather than generic messaging tests

SurveyMonkey

Messaging/claims Testing Survey Template

This is a fielding-ready static survey template aimed at testing messaging and claims, making it a reasonable comparison point for a protein/fiber claims study. It relies on standard closed-ended question types without any adaptive follow-up. It's a generic messaging-claims template rather than one built around a specific reformulation/taste-vs-health-claims tension.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel infrastructure
  • Purpose-built for messaging/claims testing use cases, so questions are likely relevant out of the box
  • Simple, familiar interface for respondents completing a standard survey

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents answer fixed questions with no probing into the taste-vs-health-claim tension
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks for deeper qualitative exploration
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.