모든 템플릿

Racism in the Workplace: Employee Check-In Survey

Measures how employees experience or witness racism and racial bias at work, how safe they feel raising concerns, and whether leadership follows through on accountability. An AI follow-up interview probes the real story behind low safety ratings or unreported incidents, surfacing details a scale score alone can't capture.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes for this check-in. We're asking about experiences with racism and racial bias at work so we can address gaps honestly. Your responses are confidential and you can skip anything you'd rather not answer. About 6 minutes.

Q02
객관식

In the last 6 months, have you personally experienced or witnessed racism or racial bias at work?

  • Yes, I personally experienced it
  • Yes, I witnessed it happen to someone else
  • Both experienced and witnessed
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q03
의견 척도필수

How safe do you feel raising a concern about racism or racial bias with your manager or HR?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all safe최대:Extremely safe
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about how our company handles racism and inclusion?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • My manager addresses racist behavior when it occurs
  • Leadership takes concerns about racism seriously
  • People of all racial backgrounds have equal opportunities for advancement here
  • I have seen colleagues held accountable for racist remarks or actions
  • I know how to report a racism-related concern
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
객관식

In the last 6 months, which of these have you personally experienced at work? Select all that apply.

  • Being excluded from meetings, projects, or decisions
  • Racial jokes, stereotypes, or slurs directed at me or in my presence
  • Being mistaken for another colleague of the same race
  • Assumptions about my competence or role based on my race
  • Being passed over for opportunities I believe were race-related
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these actions should our company prioritize to address racism and improve inclusion?

  • Mandatory training on bias and inclusive behavior
  • A clear, confidential process for reporting incidents
  • Diverse representation on hiring panels
  • Managers held accountable for addressing racist behavior
  • Active employee resource groups for underrepresented employees
  • Transparent, published promotion criteria
  • Visible commitment from senior leadership
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important to prioritize최악:Least important right now
Q07
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend this company as an inclusive place to work to a friend from an underrepresented racial or ethnic background?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's safety rating and any racism-related experiences they reported. If they rated safety low (1-2) or selected an experience above, probe what specifically happened, whether they reported it, why or why not, and what response (if any) came from their manager or HR. If they rated safety high, ask what concretely makes them feel supported. If they said they witnessed but did not experience racism, ask what stopped them from intervening or reporting it.

Q09
장문형

Is there anything else about race, racism, or inclusion at work you'd like us to know? (Optional)

Q10
객관식

How would you describe your race or ethnicity? (Optional — used only to identify patterns across groups)

  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
  • White
  • Multiracial or biracial
  • Another race or ethnicity not listed
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How long have you worked at the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1 to 3 years
  • 3 to 5 years
  • 5+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
단문형

What department or team are you part of? (Optional)

Q13
메시지

Thank you for your honesty. Responses are reviewed in aggregate by HR and leadership to identify patterns and shape concrete action — individual answers are never shared with your manager.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes the reasoning behind low safety ratings or reported incidents, going beyond scale scores to surface real context
  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scales, matrix, max-diff prioritization) with open-ended and adaptive follow-up so both breadth and depth are captured in one flow
  • Closes with a transparent chat message explaining that responses are reviewed in aggregate by HR and leadership, supporting trust in a sensitive topic
  • Offers optional demographic and tenure questions clearly marked optional, letting respondents control disclosure while still enabling equity analysis

SurveyMonkey

Impact Of Racism Employee Check-In Survey Template

This is a directly comparable, ready-to-field template addressing the same core topic — racism and racial bias in the workplace. It's built on SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure, which is a genuine strength for quick deployment and benchmarking. However, it appears to be a static question set without any mechanism for probing deeper into individual responses.

잘하는 점

  • Built on a well-established, widely used survey platform
  • Purpose-built specifically for measuring racism/DEI issues rather than generic feedback
  • Likely benefits from SurveyMonkey's broader survey design and distribution tooling

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the story behind a low safety score or an unreported incident — respondents get a fixed question set
  • No voice AI interview option for employees who prefer speaking over typing
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.