모든 템플릿

New Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study

Tests reaction to a new product or service concept — appeal, differentiation, purchase intent, and an optimal price range — for teams deciding whether to build or launch. An AI follow-up interview digs into what would make respondents actually buy or walk away.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to react to a new concept we're considering! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no wrong answers — your honest first reaction is what's most useful. This will take about 6-7 minutes.

Q02
메시지

Here's the concept: (Replace with your concept description, image, or one-page mockup. Template note: keep it to a single clear elevator pitch — one core benefit, one key feature, and how it works — so responses reflect the concept itself, not confusion about it.)

Q03
의견 척도필수

Based on this description, how likely would you be to purchase this if it were available today?

척도: 010
최소:Definitely would not purchase최대:Definitely would purchase
Q04
평점 척도필수

Overall, how appealing is this concept to you?

범위: 15
최소:Not at all appealing최대:Extremely appealing
Q05
의견 척도필수

How different is this concept from other products or services you currently use?

척도: 17
최소:Not different at all최대:Extremely different
Q06
매트릭스필수

How well does this concept deliver on each of the following?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • Solves a real problem I have
  • Is easy to understand
  • Feels credible and trustworthy
  • Offers something I can't already get elsewhere
: Not at all · Slightly · Moderately · Very well · Extremely well
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these aspects of the concept matter most to you, and which matter least?

  • (Replace with feature/benefit A)
  • (Replace with feature/benefit B)
  • (Replace with feature/benefit C)
  • (Replace with feature/benefit D)
  • (Replace with feature/benefit E)
  • (Replace with feature/benefit F)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
가격 민감도(Van Westendorp)필수

Thinking about a product like this, please answer with a specific price.

  • At what price would this be so cheap that you'd question its quality?
  • At what price would this be a bargain — a great deal for the money?
  • At what price would this start to feel expensive, though you'd still consider it?
  • At what price would this be so expensive you would not consider buying it?
Q09
객관식

If this were priced fairly and available now, how soon would you expect to buy it?

  • Immediately
  • Within the next month
  • Within the next 6 months
  • I would wait to see reviews first
  • I would not buy it
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's purchase-intent rating: what specifically would need to be true for them to buy, and what single doubt or objection is holding them back if their intent was low. If they rated the concept as not very different from alternatives, probe which existing product they compare it to and what would make this one worth switching for. Anchor at least one follow-up on their reaction to the price range they gave.

Q11
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your input! Your responses will feed directly into our concept and pricing decisions, and no individual answers will be shared outside the research team.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific reasoning behind each respondent's purchase-intent rating — surfacing what would make them actually buy or walk away, not just a static rating
  • Combines a Van Westendorp pricing question with an opinion-scale purchase-intent question and a matrix rating of how well the concept delivers on key attributes, giving both a price range and a feel for concept strength in one flow
  • Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force trade-offs on which aspects of the concept matter most vs. least, rather than relying on ratings alone
  • Wraps the whole flow in a friendly chat-style intro/outro and closes with basic demographics, so the report ties reactions to age and gender segments

QuestionPro

Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study Survey Templates

This is a directly comparable template covering concept appeal and pricing, from a large established survey platform. It reads as a standard fielding-ready questionnaire template rather than a report on live respondent reasoning. As with most QuestionPro templates, it's positioned as a customizable starting point within a broader survey-building suite.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a large, well-established survey platform with broad question-type and distribution support
  • Purpose-built specifically for concept and pricing evaluation, so the base questions are on-topic
  • Likely customizable within QuestionPro's wider survey/reporting ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe individual purchase-intent reasoning — respondents get the same static question set regardless of their answers
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks for richer qualitative context
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology to show how any AI-assisted analysis works

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.