모든 템플릿

Pricing Plan Naming and Tier Structure Comprehension Study

Tests whether prospects can correctly interpret your plan names, pick the tier that actually fits them, and understand what changes when they upgrade. Built for pricing and product teams evaluating a new plan lineup before launch, with an AI follow-up that digs into exactly which name or feature line caused hesitation or a wrong guess.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a look at our pricing plans! We're testing whether the plan names and tiers make sense at a glance — there are no wrong answers, we just want your honest first impression. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
텍스트 하이라이트

Read the plan lineup below the way you would if you landed on our pricing page. Highlight any words, phrases, or numbers that feel confusing, vague, or unclear.

Basic — $12/mo — For individuals getting started. Includes core features and email support. Plus — $29/mo — For small teams that need more. Includes everything in Basic, plus collaboration tools and…

Q03
객관식필수

Based on what you just read, which plan would you personally choose?

  • Basic
  • Plus
  • Pro
  • Enterprise
  • None of these fit me
Q04
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that the plan you picked is actually the best fit for your needs?

척도: 17
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q05
객관식필수

Separately from your own pick — which plan do you think is designed for a business or user profile like yours?

  • Basic
  • Plus
  • Pro
  • Enterprise
  • Not sure
Q06
매트릭스필수

For each plan, how clear is the name and description on its own — before comparing it to the others?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • Basic
  • Plus
  • Pro
  • Enterprise
: Very unclear · Somewhat unclear · Neutral · Somewhat clear · Very clear
Q07
순위 매기기

Rank these plan names from most confusing to least confusing.

  1. Basic
  2. Plus
  3. Pro
  4. Enterprise
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
의견 척도필수

Thinking about the plan you chose — how clear is it what you'd actually gain by upgrading to the next tier up?

척도: 15
최소:Not clear at all최대:Completely clear
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Have the respondent walk through their reasoning for the plan they chose versus the plan they thought was 'meant for them' — probe any gap between those two answers. Anchor on any word, price, or feature line they highlighted as confusing, and ask what specific change to the name or description would have made the right plan obvious immediately. If they said the upgrade path was unclear, ask what they expected to gain from upgrading versus what the copy actually promised.

Q10
객관식

What would most convince you to move to a higher tier in the future?

  • A specific feature I need becomes available
  • My usage or team size grows
  • A clearer explanation of what I'd gain
  • A lower price for the next tier
  • Nothing would convince me right now
Q11
객관식

Which best describes the size of your organization?

  • Just me
  • 2-10 employees
  • 11-50 employees
  • 51-200 employees
  • 201+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What best describes your role in choosing or approving software purchases?

  • Sole decision-maker
  • Primary decision-maker, others weigh in
  • One of several evaluators
  • I influence but don't decide
  • I don't buy software for my org
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers, along with what you highlighted, will directly shape how we name and describe our plans before this lineup goes live.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a ranking question that forces respondents to rank plan names from most to least confusing, plus a matrix rating the clarity of each plan name/description in isolation
  • Pairs a multiple-choice pick of 'which plan would you choose' with a separate multiple-choice on which plan is 'designed for a business like yours,' surfacing mismatches between self-selection and intended fit
  • Has a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that adaptively digs into exactly which name or feature line caused hesitation or a wrong guess, something a static form can't do
  • Captures respondent context (org size, purchasing role) and rating-scale confidence ratings, letting a pricing team segment where naming confusion is worst

QuestionPro

Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study Survey Templates

This is a general concept-evaluation and pricing-study template rather than one built specifically around plan-name comprehension or tier-upgrade logic. It reads as a fielding-ready template on an established enterprise survey platform, but it's positioned as a broad pricing/concept-testing tool, not a naming-clarity or tier-structure diagnostic. Teams would likely need to heavily customize it to test whether respondents correctly interpret specific plan names.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a mature, enterprise-grade survey platform with broad question-type and logic support
  • Likely reusable across many pricing/concept-testing use cases beyond plan naming
  • Probably supports standard skip logic and reporting dashboards typical of QuestionPro templates

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe which specific plan name or feature line caused confusion — respondents' reasoning is left unexplored
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for a richer comprehension check
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring like QuestionPunk provides

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.