모든 템플릿

Developer Content Filter False Positive Impact Assessment

Assess how content filter false positives affect developer productivity, workflow disruption, and tool adoption decisions. Designed for developer experience researchers and tooling teams seeking actionable improvement priorities from software practitioners.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey explores your recent experiences with content filters and false positives in developer tools. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. The survey takes approximately 10 minutes. Please answer based on the last 30 days and omit any sensitive or proprietary data.

Q02
객관식

In the last 30 days, have you used any developer tools that enforce content moderation or safety filters?

  • Yes, in the last 30 days
  • No, not in the last 30 days
Q03
객관식

Which types of developer tools with content filters have you used in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • AI code assistants (e.g., coding copilots)
  • Code hosting/PR checks (e.g., repo content policies)
  • Package registries with policy checks (e.g., npm, PyPI)
  • Documentation portals or knowledge bases
  • Q&A forums or developer communities
  • CI/CD or security policy gates
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
객관식

Why haven't you used developer tools with content filters in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • None of my current tools apply content filters
  • I avoid tools that include filters
  • Company policy restricts such tools
  • I'm unsure which tools include filters
  • Other (please specify)
Q05
의견 척도

When it comes to content filters in developer tools, which trade-off do you prefer?

척도: 17
최소:Minimize false negatives (stricter filtering)최대:Minimize false positives (more permissive filtering)
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or experiences about false positives or content filter design in developer tools.

Q07
드롭다운

What is your primary role?

  • Backend developer
  • Frontend developer
  • Full-stack developer
  • DevOps/SRE
  • ML/AI engineer
  • Security engineer
  • Engineering manager
  • QA/Testing
  • Other
Q08
메시지

Thank you for your time. Your feedback will help improve content filter design in developer tools and reduce the impact of false positives on developer workflows.

Q09
의견 척도

How often did you encounter false positives from these content filters in the last 30 days?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q10
의견 척도

If developer tools you use introduced content filters, how disruptive do you expect false positives would be to your workflow?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all disruptive최대:Extremely disruptive
Q11
객관식

In your view, what most often causes false positives in developer tool content filters? Select all that apply.

  • Ambiguous or broad policy definitions
  • Overly sensitive detection models
  • Missing contextual signals (e.g., file type, repo trust)
  • Poor or unrepresentative training examples
  • Misclassifying code vs. natural language
  • Locale or language issues
  • Unclear UI messaging or guidance
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
드롭다운

How many years of professional software development experience do you have?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–6 years
  • 7–10 years
  • 11–15 years
  • 16–20 years
  • More than 20 years
Q13
의견 척도

Overall, how disruptive were the false positives you encountered in the last 30 days?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all disruptive최대:Extremely disruptive
Q14
객관식

What informs your expectations about content filter false positives? Select all that apply.

  • Teammates' experiences
  • Industry news or reports
  • Past experiences in other tools
  • Social media or forums
  • Vendor documentation or release notes
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
순위 매기기

Rank the following improvements by how much they would reduce the impact of false positives. Place the most impactful improvement first.

  1. Clearer policy definitions in tools
  2. Better detection models (precision/recall tuning)
  3. Use more context (file type, repo trust, role)
  4. Faster and more transparent appeal or override process
  5. Granular admin and user controls
  6. Improved UI messaging and guidance
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q16
드롭다운

What is your organization size?

  • 1 (just me)
  • 2–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
Q17
장문형

Briefly describe your most recent false positive from a content filter in the last 30 days. Please omit any sensitive or proprietary data.

Q18
드롭다운

Where are you primarily located?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • Asia
  • Africa
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
드롭다운

Approximately how long did it take to resolve your most recent false positive?

  • Less than 5 minutes
  • 5–15 minutes
  • 16–30 minutes
  • 31–60 minutes
  • 1–2 hours
  • More than 2 hours
  • It was never resolved
Q20
객관식

Which programming languages do you use most often? Select all that apply.

  • JavaScript/TypeScript
  • Python
  • Java/Kotlin
  • C/C++
  • C#/.NET
  • Go
  • Ruby
  • Rust
  • Swift/Objective-C
  • PHP
  • SQL
  • Other
Q21
객관식

After encountering the false positive, what actions did you take? Select all that apply.

  • Submitted an appeal or requested a review
  • Reworded or reformatted content
  • Used a different tool or channel
  • Waited and retried later
  • Asked a teammate/admin with different access
  • Abandoned the task
  • Other (please specify)
Q22
순위 매기기

Rank the top 3 effects you experienced from false positives. Place the highest-impact effect first.

  1. Lost time
  2. Context switching
  3. Blocked release or review
  4. Lower code quality or shortcuts
  5. Frustration or stress
  6. Team coordination overhead
드래그하여 순위 지정

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.