모든 템플릿

Banking App UX Audit: Sign-In, Transfers & Alerts

Evaluates customer experience across three core digital banking touchpoints—sign-in, money movement, and notifications—to surface usability pain points, feature demand, and alert-preference data for product teams.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this survey about your digital banking experience. This survey asks about your recent experiences with signing in, making transfers, and managing alerts. It should take approximately 6–8 minutes to complete. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are voluntary, confidential, and will be reported only in aggregate. You may stop at any time. Please click 'Next' to begin.

Q02
객관식

Have you used your bank's mobile app or website to sign in at least once in the last 30 days?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
드롭다운

How often do you typically sign in to your account (across all devices)?

  • Several times a day
  • About once a day
  • A few times a week
  • About once a week
  • A few times a month
  • About once a month
Q04
객관식

In the last 30 days, which types of money movement did you use? Select all that apply.

  • Between my own accounts
  • To another person at the same bank
  • External bank transfer (ACH)
  • Wire transfer
  • International transfer
  • Bill pay
  • Person-to-person payment (P2P)
  • Mobile wallet top-up or withdrawal
  • Card-to-bank instant transfer
  • Check deposit
  • Cash withdrawal at ATM
  • None of the above
  • Other
Q05
순위 매기기

Please rank the following alert types by how important they are to you (1 = most important).

  1. Low balance
  2. Large transaction
  3. Unusual or suspicious activity
  4. Transfer completed
  5. Transfer failed
  6. Bill due or upcoming payment
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
객관식

Which of the following money movement features would you be likely to use if available? Select all that apply.

  • Instant external transfers
  • Scheduled recurring transfers
  • Real-time transfer tracking
  • Request-to-pay (ask someone to send you money)
  • Higher daily transfer limits
  • International transfers with transparent FX rates
  • Save favorite recipients
  • Split bills with contacts
  • Bulk payments to multiple recipients
  • QR code payments
  • None of the above
Q07
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your experience a bit more. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions about your transfer and alert experiences.

Q08
드롭다운

In which region do you primarily live?

  • North America
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Europe
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for your time — your feedback directly helps us improve the sign-in, transfer, and alert experience. Your responses are confidential and will be analyzed in aggregate.

Q10
의견 척도

Overall, how easy or difficult is it to sign in to your account?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q11
드롭다운

Approximately how many transfers or bill payments did you complete in the last 30 days?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • More than 20
Q12
드롭다운

For a 'large transaction' alert, what minimum amount would you want to be notified about?

  • $50+
  • $100+
  • $250+
  • $500+
  • $1,000+
  • $5,000+
  • I'd set a custom amount
Q13
장문형

Based on your experience, what one change would most improve your sign-in, transfer, or alert experience?

Q14
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
객관식

In the last 30 days, which, if any, sign-in issues did you experience? Select all that apply.

  • Forgot password
  • One-time code delayed
  • One-time code not received
  • Account locked
  • Biometric (Face ID / Touch ID) failed
  • Two-step verification was confusing
  • Other
  • None of the above
Q16
의견 척도

Thinking about your most recent transfer or payment, how easy or difficult was it to complete?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q17
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
의견 척도

How would you rate the speed of your most recent transfer or payment?

척도: 17
최소:Much too slow최대:Very fast
Q19
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college, no degree
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

How confident are you that your transfers and payments will be processed correctly and securely?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q21
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time employed
  • Part-time employed
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Unemployed and looking
  • Not working by choice
  • Retired
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Structured around three specific banking touchpoints — sign-in, money movement, and alerts — with dedicated question blocks for each, rather than one generic CX question set.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes deeper on the participant's sign-in, transfer, or alert experience instead of stopping at fixed-choice answers.
  • Captures granular alert-preference data through a ranked-importance question and a specific 'large transaction' notification threshold dropdown.
  • Closes with an open-text 'one change to improve' question plus standard demographic screening (region, age, gender, education, employment) for segment-level analysis.

SurveySparrow

Bank Customer Service Request Form Template

This is a customer service request/intake form, not a UX audit of sign-in, transfers, or alerts — it's built to log service issues rather than measure digital experience quality. It is fielding-ready on SurveySparrow's conversational form format, but the content doesn't overlap much with a UX-focused study.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style form UI typical of SurveySparrow
  • Ready to deploy as-is for capturing service requests
  • Banking-specific template rather than a generic industry form

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up probing on usability friction points
  • Not structured to evaluate sign-in, transfer, or alert experience specifically
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated UX report

QuestionPro

Service Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a generic service-evaluation question bank/guide rather than a banking-specific, fielding-ready survey — it would need substantial customization to address sign-in, transfers, or alert preferences. It's useful as a general reference for service-quality question wording.

잘하는 점

  • Broad library of general customer service evaluation questions
  • Established survey platform with standard reporting/analytics
  • Applicable across multiple industries, not banking-locked

아쉬운 점

  • Static question list with no adaptive AI follow-up interview
  • Not tailored to digital banking touchpoints like sign-in or money movement
  • No voice AI or guided task/screen-share option, and no transparent prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

Customer Experience Survey Template & Questions

A general-purpose CX template with standard satisfaction and rating questions, not designed around banking-specific touchpoints such as sign-in, transfers, or alert preferences. It's fielding-ready in a generic sense but would need heavy rework to match a banking UX audit.

잘하는 점

  • Widely used, established survey platform with mature analytics
  • General CX question library covering satisfaction and loyalty metrics
  • Simple to launch quickly for broad feedback collection

아쉬운 점

  • No banking-specific structure covering sign-in, transfers, and alerts as distinct sections
  • Static multiple-choice/rating questions only, no adaptive AI interview
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or built-in report generation for UX insights

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.