QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Teacher Performance and Classroom Experience Evaluation

Captures how students experience a teacher's clarity, fairness, feedback, and engagement using a rating battery and a best-worst trade-off on what matters most, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their lowest rating instead of a vague complaint. Built for course or semester-end teacher evaluations.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Hi! We'd like your honest feedback on this teacher's class. It takes about 5 minutes, your answers are confidential, and specific examples help the most.

Q02
객관식

Including this term, how many classes have you taken with this teacher?

  • This is my first
  • Two
  • Three
  • Four or more
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Explains concepts clearly
  • Is fair and unbiased in grading
  • Encourages questions and participation
  • Provides timely feedback on assignments
  • Manages class time effectively
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective is this teacher at helping you learn the material?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q05
객관식

In the last month, how often did this teacher respond when you asked for help outside of class (email, office hours, messages)?

  • Never asked
  • Never responded
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Every time I asked
Q06
평점 척도필수

How clear were this teacher's grading criteria and expectations for assignments?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

For each set, pick which quality matters most and which matters least to your learning in this teacher's class.

  • Explains material clearly
  • Is approachable and available for help
  • Grades fairly
  • Gives useful feedback on work
  • Makes the subject interesting
  • Manages the classroom effectively
  • Is well organized and prepared
  • Cares about student success
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this teacher's class to another student?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Identify the statement the respondent rated lowest in the earlier agreement battery (or the aspect behind a low overall effectiveness score) and get a specific, recent example of it happening in class — what occurred, how it affected their learning, and whether it was a one-time issue or a pattern. If everything was rated highly, probe what this teacher does that other teachers don't, anchored on a concrete classroom moment.

Q10
장문형

Is there anything specific this teacher could do differently to help you learn better?

Q11
객관식

What grade or year level are you in?

  • 9th grade
  • 10th grade
  • 11th grade
  • 12th grade
  • College/University
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Responses are combined with other students' answers into a summary report shared with school leadership to support this teacher's development.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Uses a rating and agreement-statement battery to establish where a teacher is weakest, then triggers an AI follow-up interview specifically on the statement the student rated lowest, replacing vague written complaints with a concrete moment
  • Includes a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off exercise so results show which qualities (clarity, fairness, feedback, engagement) matter most to students' learning rather than just raw averages
  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale effectiveness, recommendation likelihood, grading-clarity rating) with an open-ended 'what could this teacher do differently' question and a targeted AI probe for richer, actionable qualitative detail
  • Transparent about what's being asked and why, with a short intro/outro message framing the survey as ~5 minutes and confirming responses will be aggregated with other students'

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

A course/teacher evaluation template with sample questions covering instructor effectiveness and course quality, aimed at academic institutions. It's a static question set you can adapt, not an interactive interview. Good starting point for standard Likert-style course evaluations but leaves qualitative depth to open-text fields alone.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for academic course/teacher evaluation context
  • Provides sample questions covering both course and instructor dimensions
  • Backed by a broader survey platform with reporting/analytics tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe a student's specific lowest-rated experience
  • No built-in trade-off (best-worst) method to rank which teaching qualities matter most
  • No published methodology for how open-ended responses are scored or summarized

SurveyMonkey

Teacher Evaluation Survey Template

SurveyMonkey's teacher evaluation template targets high school settings and offers a ready-to-use question set on teaching quality. It's a conventional static form relying on multiple choice and rating scales, with no mechanism to dig deeper into a specific low rating. Useful for quick deployment but limited for uncovering the story behind a poor score.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known, easy-to-deploy survey builder with broad distribution options
  • Template is pre-built specifically for high school teacher evaluation
  • Likely includes standard reporting/analytics dashboards

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question flow with no adaptive interview to follow up on a student's lowest rating
  • No best-worst trade-off question type to prioritize which teacher qualities matter most
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Typeform

Free Teacher & Course Evaluation Form Template

Typeform offers a conversational-style teacher and course evaluation form with a clean, one-question-at-a-time UI. It's a static template with no branching logic tied to a respondent's specific answers, so a low rating doesn't trigger any deeper questioning. Good for a pleasant respondent experience but not for structured qualitative follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational form UI that can improve completion rates
  • Free template available, lowering barrier to entry
  • Covers both course and teacher evaluation angles in one template

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option to explore a specific complaint
  • No max-diff/trade-off question to identify which qualities matter most to students
  • No automated quality scoring of responses or transparent AI prompt disclosure

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기