모든 템플릿

Price Sensitivity & Willingness-to-Pay Survey

Maps how a target market perceives a product or service's price using the four classic price-sensitivity questions, then layers in purchase intent, feature value trade-offs, and a budget allocation exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each respondent's expensive/cheap thresholds so pricing teams get the numbers and the 'why' behind them.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 10개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us think through pricing! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no wrong answers here — we're just trying to understand what feels fair, cheap, or expensive to you. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
가격 민감도(Van Westendorp)필수

Four quick questions about price.

  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be priced so low that you'd question its quality? (Template note: replace with your own product name and, if useful, show respondents a description or image of it before this question.)
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be a bargain — a great deal for the money?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be getting expensive — not out of the question, but you'd need to think hard before buying it?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be so expensive that you would not consider buying it at all?
Q03
평점 척도필수

At a price of (Replace with test price point), how likely would you be to purchase (Replace with product/service name) in the next 3 months?

범위: 15
최소:Definitely would not buy최대:Definitely would buy
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, roughly how much have you spent on (Replace with product category, e.g., 'project management software')?

  • $0
  • $1-$25
  • $26-$50
  • $51-$100
  • $101-$250
  • More than $250
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these features most justifies paying a higher price?

  • (Replace with feature A)
  • (Replace with feature B)
  • (Replace with feature C)
  • (Replace with feature D)
  • (Replace with feature E)
  • (Replace with feature F)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most justifies a higher price최악:Least justifies a higher price
Q06
점수 배분필수

Imagine 100 points represent the total value you get from this product. Distribute them across these plans based on how much value each one delivers relative to its price.

  • (Replace with Basic plan name/price)
  • (Replace with Standard plan name/price)
  • (Replace with Premium plan name/price)
100점 배분
Q07
평점 척도필수

Compared to similar products you've used, how would you rate the value for money of (Replace with product/service name)?

범위: 15
최소:Much worse value than competitors최대:Much better value than competitors
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind this respondent's 'expensive' and 'too expensive' price points from the earlier pricing questions — what specifically would need to be true (features, quality signals, brand trust) for them to accept a higher price, and what would make them walk away. If their stated purchase intent seems inconsistent with their price thresholds (e.g., high intent at a price they called 'expensive'), gently surface and explore that tension rather than pointing it out as a contradiction.

Q09
객관식

Which range best describes your total annual household income?

  • Under $30,000
  • $30,000-$59,999
  • $60,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed directly into a pricing model that shapes how we set and package prices going forward.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes all four classic Van Westendorp price-sensitivity questions plus a purchase-intent rating at a specific test price point, so you get both the standard thresholds and real-world buying likelihood.
  • Adds a MaxDiff feature-value trade-off and a constant-sum budget allocation exercise, giving pricing teams a view of which features actually justify a higher price — not just the price thresholds themselves.
  • Pairs the numeric pricing questions with an AI follow-up interview that probes each respondent's reasoning behind their 'expensive' and 'too expensive' answers, turning flat data points into explained thresholds.
  • Auto-generates a pricing-ready report from the combined quantitative and qualitative responses, so teams aren't left manually reconciling spreadsheet numbers with open-ended comments.

Jotform

Price Sensitivity Survey Form Template

A ready-to-field form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, focused on collecting price-sensitivity data. It's a static questionnaire rather than an interview experience, and customization is mainly about form fields and design, not follow-up logic.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's broader form ecosystem
  • Can be embedded or shared as a standalone form quickly
  • Integrates with Jotform's existing data collection and notification tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents answer fixed fields only
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

Price Testing Survey Template

A fielding-ready template from an established survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking support. It covers standard price-testing questions but relies on static multiple-choice/rating items rather than conversational follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature analytics and reporting dashboards
  • Large existing user base and benchmark data for comparison
  • Straightforward to deploy across multiple distribution channels

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to probe the reasoning behind price thresholds
  • No voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent, per-response AI prompt methodology published

SurveySparrow

Price Sensitivity Questionnaire Template

A conversational-style survey template that presents price-sensitivity questions in SurveySparrow's chat-like UI. It's fielding-ready but the 'conversational' format is a fixed script rather than a dynamic AI-driven interview.

잘하는 점

  • Chat-style UI that can feel more engaging than a traditional form
  • Mobile-friendly presentation for respondents
  • Part of a broader survey suite with logic branching options

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated quality scoring or documented AI prompt transparency

Typeform

Price Sensitivity Survey Template

A polished, fielding-ready template using Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time interface, well suited to the four core Van Westendorp questions. It is a static question flow, though, without dynamic probing based on individual answers.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, high-engagement one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Strong visual design and branding customization
  • Simple logic jumps based on prior answers

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore individual pricing reasoning
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.