Patient Experience Survey: Access, Communication & Care Quality
Measures patient satisfaction across appointment access, provider communication, follow-up timeliness, and digital touchpoints for healthcare organizations seeking actionable improvement insights and NPS benchmarking.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
When was your most recent visit or interaction with us?
- Within the last 7 days
- 2–4 weeks ago
- 1–3 months ago
- 3–6 months ago
How did you schedule or start that visit?
- Website
- Mobile app
- Phone call
- Walk-in
- Referral link or email
- Third-party marketplace
- Other
We'd like to understand your communication experience with your provider. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement.
After your visit, did you receive follow-up information or results?
- Yes, within 24 hours
- Yes, within 2–3 days
- Yes, but later than 3 days
- No follow-up was needed
- No, I expected follow-up but did not receive it
Which of the following digital features, if any, did you use for this visit? Select all that apply.
- Online booking
- Secure messaging
- View lab results
- Prescription refill
- Payment/checkout
- Order tracking for meds/devices
- None of the above
Based on your experience, what is one thing we could improve for patients like you?
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your feedback—your responses will help us improve care for patients like you.
What type of care did you receive most recently?
- Primary care
- Specialist visit
- Urgent care
- Telehealth/video visit
- Message-only consult
- Lab or imaging
- Pharmacy/medication delivery
- Other
Overall, how easy was it to get the care you needed?
My provider listened carefully to me.
Overall, how would you rate your experience with the clinician you saw?
How easy was the website or app to use for your needs?
We'd like to learn a bit more about your visit. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your responses.
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Approximately how long did you wait past your scheduled appointment time?
- Seen on time or early
- 1–10 minutes
- 11–20 minutes
- 21–30 minutes
- 31–45 minutes
- More than 45 minutes
- Not applicable (e.g., telehealth, walk-in)
My provider explained things in a way I could understand.
My main health concern was addressed or resolved during this visit.
In which country do you currently reside?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- European Union
- Other country
- Prefer not to say
My provider showed respect for what I had to say.
How likely are you to recommend our care to a friend or family member?
I felt involved in decisions about my care.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview segment that lets patients elaborate on their visit in their own words, beyond fixed-choice questions
- Covers the full experience arc in one instrument: appointment access and wait time, provider communication (listening, clarity, respect, involvement), follow-up timeliness, and digital touchpoint usage
- Pairs a clinician rating and an explicit recommend-likelihood question with an open-text improvement prompt, giving both quantifiable NPS-style benchmarking and qualitative signal
- Uses transparent, reviewable question and interview prompts plus automated scoring, so healthcare teams can audit exactly what was asked and how responses were evaluated
SurveySparrow
Free Patient Satisfaction Survey Template | For Healthcare IndustryA ready-to-use static patient satisfaction template covering standard experience dimensions like care quality and staff interaction. It's built for quick deployment across chat-style or classic survey formats but relies on fixed questions rather than adaptive probing. Good for teams wanting a fast baseline NPS-type survey without deeper qualitative follow-up.
잘하는 점
- Free, ready-to-field template aimed specifically at healthcare patient satisfaction
- Supports SurveySparrow's conversational-style survey format for better completion rates
- Likely includes standard satisfaction and NPS-style questions out of the box
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe individual patient answers in real time
- No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
- Static question set means all patients see the same questions regardless of their answers
QuestionPro
Health Insurance Satisfaction Survey TemplateThis template is focused on health insurance satisfaction rather than direct patient care experience (access, provider communication, follow-up), so it targets a narrower and somewhat different use case than a clinical patient experience survey. It's a standard fielding-ready form template within QuestionPro's broader survey platform. Useful if the goal is plan/insurer feedback rather than care-quality benchmarking.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use template within an established enterprise survey platform
- Likely includes robust reporting and cross-tab analysis tools typical of QuestionPro
- Can be customized within a mature survey-logic builder
아쉬운 점
- Template topic (insurance) is not a direct match for care-quality/provider-communication measurement
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interviews or voice AI interview option
- No transparent, auditable prompt-level methodology for how responses are scored
SurveyMonkey
Patient Satisfaction Survey TemplateA post-visit patient satisfaction template covering common experience touchpoints, positioned as a straightforward fielding-ready survey. It's built on SurveyMonkey's traditional question-and-logic survey engine rather than any conversational or AI-driven interview format. Solid for basic post-visit pulse checks but limited for deeper qualitative insight.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-field template from a well-known, widely trusted survey platform
- Likely supports skip logic and benchmarking against SurveyMonkey's question bank
- Simple setup for post-visit satisfaction pulse surveys
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI or voice AI interview component for deeper follow-up on patient answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring described
- Fixed-form structure only, without guided screen-share tasks or conversational probing
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.