BNPL Consumer Usage, Trust & Attitudes Survey
Measures Buy Now, Pay Later adoption patterns, provider preferences, spending thresholds, trust drivers, and consumer concerns. Designed for fintech product teams, lenders, and market researchers seeking segmentation and attitudinal insights from adult consumers.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Have you used a Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) service (e.g., Klarna, Afterpay, Affirm) in the past 12 months?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
Which BNPL providers have you used in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Affirm
- Afterpay
- Klarna
- PayPal Pay in 4 / Pay Monthly
- Sezzle
- Zip
- Bank-issued BNPL plan
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
How likely are you to use a BNPL service in the next 6 months?
Please rank the following factors from most important (1) to least important when choosing a BNPL provider.
- Total cost (interest and fees)
- Length of installment plan
- Spending or credit limit offered
- Accepted at stores/websites I shop at
- Ease of use at checkout or in-app
- Transparency and clarity of terms
BNPL helps me manage larger purchases without financial stress.
Please rank your biggest concerns about using BNPL services, from most concerning (1) to least concerning.
- Overspending or impulse buying
- Hidden or unexpected fees
- Building up debt
- Impact on credit score
- Difficulty with returns or refunds
- Data privacy and security
In the next 3 months, for which of the following purchase categories would you consider using BNPL? Select all that apply.
- Electronics
- Clothing and fashion
- Travel
- Groceries
- Furniture and home goods
- Health and beauty
- Digital subscriptions
- Automotive and parts
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experiences, feelings, or views on BNPL services?
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses have been recorded and will help improve understanding of consumer BNPL experiences. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the research team.
Approximately how many times have you used a BNPL service in the past 12 months?
- 0 times
- 1 time
- 2–3 times
- 4–6 times
- 7–10 times
- More than 10 times
- Prefer not to say
What is the highest single purchase amount you would feel comfortable financing through BNPL?
- Under $50
- $50–$99
- $100–$249
- $250–$499
- $500–$999
- $1,000–$2,499
- $2,500–$4,999
- $5,000 or more
- I would not use BNPL
- Prefer not to say
I trust BNPL providers to be transparent about all fees and terms.
Imagine you are making a purchase of about $200 (or local equivalent). Which payment method would you most likely choose?
- Pay in full with debit or credit card (no balance carried)
- Use BNPL installments
- Use a credit card and carry a balance
- Would not make this purchase
- Other payment method
We'd like to understand your BNPL decision-making in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about how you decide when and why to use BNPL.
Which best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How important is a guarantee of no late fees when choosing a BNPL provider?
Using BNPL sometimes leads me to spend more than I originally planned.
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college, no degree
- Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
I would recommend BNPL services to a friend or family member.
What is your current employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Self-employed
- Homemaker
- Student
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
Which country do you currently live in?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- Germany
- France
- India
- Brazil
- Mexico
- Japan
- South Korea
- Nigeria
- South Africa
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview module that probes BNPL decision-making in the respondent's own words, beyond fixed-choice answers
- Combines quantitative segmentation (usage frequency, provider preferences, spending thresholds) with attitudinal opinion-scale and ranking questions on trust and concerns
- Captures a realistic $200 purchase scenario and forward-looking usage intent alongside demographic segmentation variables
- Ends with an open-text reflection question plus an automated summary report, giving both structured data and qualitative color
Jotform
Consumer Spending Survey Form TemplateA general-purpose consumer spending form template rather than one built around BNPL adoption, provider trust, or fintech-specific behaviors. Useful as a generic starting point but requires substantial editing to capture BNPL-specific segmentation and attitudes. It is a static, ready-to-embed form rather than an interview instrument.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use drag-and-drop form builder
- Easy embedding and customization for general spending questions
- Free-tier accessibility typical of Jotform's platform
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe individual spending rationale
- Not tailored to BNPL providers, fee trust, or credit-threshold behavior
- No automated per-response quality scoring or generated attitudinal report
SurveySparrow
Consumer Expenditure Survey TemplateFocuses on broad household/consumer expenditure patterns rather than BNPL-specific adoption, provider comparison, or trust drivers. It's a conversational-style static template, which suits general spending research but not fintech segmentation work out of the box. Would need significant rebuilding to match BNPL-specific constructs like fee transparency trust or concern ranking.
잘하는 점
- Conversational chat-style UI improves completion rates
- Good for general expenditure/category-level spending tracking
- Simple template reuse across marketing research use cases
아쉬운 점
- No AI-moderated follow-up interview or voice interview option
- Not designed for BNPL provider comparison, spending thresholds, or trust/concern ranking
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.