QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Coaching Engagement Effectiveness Evaluation

Measures whether a coaching engagement actually moved the needle — session consistency, coach behaviors, goal progress, and likelihood to continue or recommend — for coaching practices and internal L&D teams evaluating a coach or program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific breakthrough moment and the biggest gap the coach didn't address.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your coaching experience. Your honest feedback helps us understand what's working and what to improve — this should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

What was the primary focus of your coaching engagement?

  • Leadership development
  • Career transition
  • Performance improvement
  • Executive presence / communication
  • Team or people management
  • Other
Q03
객관식필수

How many coaching sessions have you completed so far?

  • 1-2 sessions
  • 3-5 sessions
  • 6-10 sessions
  • More than 10 sessions
Q04
의견 척도필수

How much progress have you made toward the goals you set at the start of coaching?

척도: 1 – 10
최소:No progress at all최대:Fully achieved my goals
Q05
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your coach?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Listened to and understood my specific challenges
  • Held me accountable between sessions
  • Gave feedback I could actually act on
  • Tailored their approach to my situation, not a generic script
  • Challenged me appropriately without being dismissive
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
평점 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with your coach?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these aspects of coaching matter most to your progress, and which matter least?

  • Structured goal-setting at the outset
  • Accountability check-ins between sessions
  • Personalized, specific feedback
  • Industry or role-specific expertise
  • Flexibility of scheduling
  • Emotional support during tough moments
  • Practical tools and frameworks
  • Personal rapport and trust with the coach
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this coach or coaching program to a colleague?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Identify the single moment or session where this respondent felt they made the most real progress — what happened, what the coach did, and what changed afterward in their behavior at work. Then probe for the biggest challenge or blind spot they raised that the coach never fully addressed. If they report low progress or low satisfaction, dig into whether the mismatch was the coach's approach, session frequency, or their own follow-through, and anchor on one concrete recent example rather than a general impression.

Q10
장문형

Anything specific your coach could do differently to make future sessions more valuable?

Q11
드롭다운

Which best describes your current role level? (Optional)

  • Individual contributor
  • First-line manager
  • Mid-level manager
  • Senior leader / executive
  • Business owner / founder
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been working with this coach? (Optional)

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1-3 months
  • 3-6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • More than a year
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will be used to coach the coaches — informing feedback and program adjustments, with individual answers kept confidential.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a static satisfaction form with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific session or moment where the client felt real progress happened, and probes the biggest gap the coach didn't address.
  • Pairs quantitative rigor — an opinion scale on goal progress, a matrix rating specific coach behaviors, a max-diff prioritization of what matters most to progress, and a recommend-likelihood scale — with genuine open-ended reflection.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring flags low-effort or vague answers before they reach the coach or L&D team, and the engagement auto-generates a report instead of leaving you to tabulate raw exports.
  • Optional role-level and tenure-with-coach questions let you segment results by seniority or engagement length without bloating the core survey for every respondent.

Jotform

Online Coaching Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, static form template for gathering coaching feedback, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready out of the box but relies on fixed questions rather than any adaptive questioning. Best suited for teams wanting a quick, customizable form rather than deeper qualitative insight into what happened during coaching.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize via drag-and-drop builder
  • Fielding-ready template, no setup from scratch required
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform's platform

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specific breakthrough moments or unaddressed gaps
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, inspectable interview methodology since there's no AI interviewing component

Typeform

Coaching Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style, one-question-at-a-time template optimized for completion rate and visual polish. It's a genuine fielding-ready template for coaching feedback, but it's still a fixed-path form with conditional logic branching, not a true adaptive interview. Good for a pleasant respondent experience; not built for probing follow-up depth.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational UX known to improve completion rates
  • Simple to customize and brand
  • Supports logic-based branching between questions

아쉬운 점

  • Logic branching is not the same as an AI-driven adaptive follow-up interview that digs into a specific moment or gap
  • No automated quality scoring of responses
  • No voice AI interview option or auto-generated analytical report built into the template

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기