QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Remote Daily Scrum Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether your team's remote daily scrum actually surfaces blockers and aligns work, or has drifted into a status-reporting ritual. Covers time-boxing, psychological safety, format, and top friction points, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent example instead of vague impressions. Built for scrum masters, engineering managers, and agile coaches running distributed teams.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Hi! We're looking at how well our remote daily scrum is actually working for the team. Your honest take helps us fix what's broken. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 7 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last two weeks, how often did you attend your team's daily scrum?

  • Every time
  • Most days
  • About half the time
  • Rarely
  • Never
Q03
의견 척도필수

How useful is the daily scrum for coordinating your work this sprint?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not useful at all최대:Extremely useful
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your team's daily scrum?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The meeting starts within a minute or two of the scheduled time
  • Updates focus on blockers and dependencies, not a status recitation
  • I leave knowing exactly what I need to do next
  • The meeting stays within its time-box (typically 15 minutes)
  • I feel comfortable raising a blocker or asking for help in the meeting
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
객관식필수

How is your daily scrum typically run?

  • Live video call
  • Live audio-only call
  • Text or chat-based async update
  • Rotating mix of the above
Q06
순위 매기기필수

Rank these from biggest to smallest obstacle to a genuinely useful daily scrum for your team.

  1. Time zone conflicts
  2. Video call fatigue
  3. Status recitation with no real problem-solving
  4. Meeting runs long or drifts off-topic
  5. A few voices dominate the conversation
  6. Low attendance or chronic lateness
  7. Unclear next steps after the meeting ends
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to speak up in the daily scrum when you're stuck or behind on something?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct a specific, recent daily scrum for this respondent: what was said, whether a real blocker or dependency came up, and what happened after (did anyone follow up, or did it vanish once the call ended). Anchor on their lowest-rated statement or usefulness score and get a concrete example rather than a general opinion. If they said they're unlikely to speak up, probe what stops them — time-box pressure, who's in the room, or the format itself — and whether an async or written update would work better for them.

Q09
장문형

If you could change one thing about your team's daily scrum, what would it be and why?

Q10
객관식

Which best describes your role on the team?

  • Individual contributor / engineer
  • Scrum master / team lead
  • Product owner / manager
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How many time zones does your team typically span during the daily scrum?

  • Same time zone
  • 1-2 zones apart
  • 3-5 zones apart
  • More than 5 zones apart
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thanks for the candid feedback! We're combining these answers across the team to see where our daily scrum is working and where it needs a reset — no responses are shared individually.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific, recent daily scrum (what was said, who was blocked, what got resolved) instead of relying on vague Likert impressions
  • Combines structured measurement (time-boxing frequency, a matrix of agreement statements, and a ranking of biggest obstacles) with open-ended diagnosis of what respondents would change and why
  • Captures psychological safety directly by asking how likely people are to speak up when stuck or behind, not just whether the meeting 'felt useful'
  • Segments results by role and by how many time zones the team spans, so distributed-team friction can be separated from format problems

SurveySparrow

Remote Daily Scrum Template

This is a directly comparable, fielding-ready template for the same use case: assessing remote daily scrum meetings. It's built as a static questionnaire on SurveySparrow's conversational-form platform, aimed at a similar scrum/engineering-manager audience. It doesn't appear to offer adaptive follow-up or per-response quality scoring based on the page title and known product design.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built specifically for remote daily scrum feedback, matching audience intent closely
  • Runs on SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style survey format
  • Likely quick to deploy with pre-set questions for scrum-specific topics

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct a specific recent scrum instance
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports
  • No published prompt-level methodology or transparency into how responses are interpreted

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기