Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Mailing List Subscriber Engagement Survey
Finds out whether your email newsletter is earning opens, feels relevant, and is sent at the right cadence — for anyone who owns a mailing list. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reason behind low relevance or satisfaction scores instead of settling for a number.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
In the last 30 days, how many of our emails did you open?
- None of them
- One or two
- About half
- Most or all of them
Q03
의견 척도필수
How relevant is the content in our emails to your interests right now?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not relevant at all최대:Extremely relevant
Q04
매트릭스
How useful is each type of content we send?
4개 행 × 3개 열
- Product updates (Replace with your own content type)
- Tips and how-tos (Replace with your own content type)
- Promotions and discounts (Replace with your own content type)
- Industry news (Replace with your own content type)
열: Not useful · Somewhat useful · Very useful
Q05
객관식필수
How often would you ideally like to hear from us?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- Once a week
- Every two weeks
- Once a month or less
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these topics matter most to you in future emails, and which matter least?
- New product announcements (Replace with your own topic)
- How-to guides and tutorials (Replace with your own topic)
- Customer success stories (Replace with your own topic)
- Discounts and special offers (Replace with your own topic)
- Industry trends and news (Replace with your own topic)
- Behind-the-scenes company updates (Replace with your own topic)
- Event and webinar invites (Replace with your own topic)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most interesting최악:Least interesting
Q07
평점 척도필수
Overall, how satisfied are you with our emails?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's relevance and satisfaction ratings, anchoring on whichever content type they rated least useful in the earlier grid. If they gave a low relevance score, find out what content or topic would make the emails feel worth opening; if they gave a high score, find out which specific email or moment stood out and why. If they mention wanting a different frequency, ask what triggered that preference (too much volume, missed emails, timing).
Q09
단문형
If you could change one thing about our emails, what would it be?
Q10
객관식
How long have you been subscribed to our mailing list?
- Less than a month
- 1-6 months
- 6-12 months
- Over a year
- Not sure
- Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식
Which best describes your relationship to us?
- Current customer
- Past customer
- Prospective customer
- Just interested in the content
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
Thank you for the feedback! We use responses like yours to decide what we send, how often, and to whom — nothing here affects whether you stay on the list unless you choose to unsubscribe.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Combines closed-ended cadence, relevance, and satisfaction ratings with an AI follow-up interview that automatically probes why a subscriber gave a low relevance or satisfaction score, instead of leaving that reasoning to guesswork
- Includes a matrix question to compare usefulness across content types and a max-diff exercise to rank future topic priorities, giving structured signal beyond a single satisfaction number
- Captures subscriber tenure and relationship type so low scores can be segmented by how long someone has been on the list or how they relate to the brand
- Ends with a short open-text question and a transparent closing message explaining how responses will be used, and every AI prompt used in the interview is disclosed rather than hidden
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.