모든 템플릿

Nonprofit Event Exit & Post-Event Feedback Survey

Captures how attendees experienced your fundraiser, gala, or community event right after it ends — covering logistics, program content, and likelihood to return or recommend. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped each person's rating, so you learn what to fix or repeat before the next event.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks so much for coming today! We'd love a few minutes of honest feedback while the event is still fresh — it directly shapes how we plan the next one. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 4-5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your history with our events?

  • First time attending
  • Attended 1-2 times before
  • Regular attendee (3+ events)
  • Volunteer or staff at this event
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied were you with today's event?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q04
매트릭스필수

How would you rate each part of the event?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Registration and check-in
  • Venue and logistics
  • Program content and speakers
  • Networking opportunities
  • Value for the time you invested
: Poor · Below Average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this event to a friend or colleague?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q06
객관식필수

How likely are you to attend a future event with us?

  • Definitely will
  • Probably will
  • Might or might not
  • Probably will not
  • Definitely will not
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

Which of these, if improved, would make the biggest difference to your experience at future events?

  • Registration and check-in speed
  • Venue and location
  • Program agenda and pacing
  • Speaker or session quality
  • Networking time
  • Food and refreshments
  • Cost or donation ask
  • Communication before the event
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would most improve future events최악:Would least improve future events
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the specific moment or interaction that most shaped this attendee's satisfaction and recommendation score. If they rated the event highly, find out exactly what should be repeated and why it stood out. If they rated it low or picked a specific area for improvement in the trade-off question, dig into what broke down, when they noticed it, and what would have fixed it in the moment. Avoid letting them stay abstract — anchor on what actually happened during the event.

Q09
장문형

Is there anything else you'd like the organizers to know about your experience today?

Q10
객관식

Would you like more information about volunteering or donating to support future events?

  • Yes, send me information
  • No, not right now
  • I'm already involved
Q11
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you for taking the time! Your feedback goes straight to our events team and helps us make the next gathering even better for the community.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs quick quantitative pulses (overall satisfaction, a matrix rating of logistics/program/etc., and recommend likelihood) with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific moment that shaped each attendee's rating — something a static question list can't do.
  • Includes a max-diff question to pinpoint which single improvement would matter most, plus a dedicated opt-in for volunteering/donating that turns satisfied attendees into future supporters.
  • Chat-style opening and closing messages set a warm, on-brand tone for a fundraiser or gala rather than a generic corporate form.
  • Transparent prompts, auto-generated reports, and automated per-response quality scoring give nonprofit staff a ready-to-share summary without manually reading every open-ended answer.

QuestionPro

Non Profit Event Exit Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a direct topical match — a sample questionnaire aimed specifically at nonprofit event exit feedback. It reads as a static list of sample questions rather than a fully adaptive, fielding-ready interview experience, and any follow-up depends on the survey builder's standard skip logic rather than dynamic probing.

잘하는 점

  • Nonprofit-specific framing matching the exact use case
  • Backed by an established, full-featured survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Likely includes benchmarking/reporting tools typical of QuestionPro's suite

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the reasoning behind a given rating
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring

Jotform

Post Event Feedback Survey Form Template

A general-purpose post-event feedback form rather than one tailored to nonprofit fundraisers or galas. It's a drag-and-drop, fielding-ready template, but the question set is fixed and identical for every respondent regardless of their answers.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform
  • Broad template library and integrations for distribution
  • Mobile-friendly form design

아쉬운 점

  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI probing of individual responses
  • No voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring published

SurveyMonkey

Event Feedback Form Template

A widely used, general event-feedback template rather than nonprofit-specific; it's ready to field but relies on the same fixed set of questions for all respondents. Strong brand recognition and ease of distribution are its main draws.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known, easy-to-use survey builder
  • Large template gallery for quick setup
  • Established reporting and analytics dashboard

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore the moment behind a rating
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure

SurveySparrow

Participant Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style form template for general event participant feedback, not specifically nonprofit fundraisers. It offers a chat-like UI but still presents a fixed question sequence rather than a genuinely adaptive interview.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational form format that feels more engaging than a plain grid
  • Ready-to-use event feedback template
  • Mobile-optimized presentation

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI follow-up probing of each response
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.