QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Student Perceptions of Grading Rubric Quality

Measures student perceptions of rubric clarity, fairness, and usefulness for learning. Designed for course designers and academic researchers seeking to improve grading transparency and rubric design.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey asks about your experience with a grading rubric used in one of your courses this term. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to help improve rubric design and grading practices. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. The survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Please think of one specific rubric from a single course or assignment this term and answer all questions with that rubric in mind.

Q02
객관식

Have you received and reviewed a grading rubric for any course assignment this term?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

What type of course used the rubric you are evaluating?

  • STEM lecture
  • STEM lab
  • Humanities
  • Social sciences
  • Arts/design
  • Business
  • Education
  • Professional/health
  • Other
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how clear was the rubric in communicating what was expected?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q05
순위 매기기

Which of the following improvements to the rubric would be most valuable? Please rank your top three from highest to lowest priority.

  1. Clearer criterion descriptions
  2. More examples or sample work at each level
  3. Explanation of how points are weighted
  4. Sharing the rubric earlier in the course
  5. Greater consistency across graders
  6. More room for creativity or alternative approaches
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
드롭다운

What is your current level of study?

  • High school/secondary
  • Undergraduate
  • Graduate (Master's/Doctoral)
  • Professional program (e.g., JD, MD)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q07
메시지

Thank you for sharing your feedback! Your responses will be used to improve rubric design and grading transparency. If you have any questions about this survey, please contact the research team.

Q08
객관식

What type of assignment used this rubric?

  • Paper/essay
  • Project or presentation
  • Lab report
  • Problem set or exam
  • Participation/discussion
  • Portfolio/studio
  • Other
Q09
의견 척도

Overall, how fair was the grading you received based on this rubric?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all fair최대:Extremely fair
Q10
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts about how this rubric could be improved.

Q11
객관식

What is your enrollment status this term?

  • Full-time student
  • Part-time student
  • Not currently enrolled
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

When did you first receive or access the rubric for this assignment?

  • At the start of the course or unit
  • With the assignment prompt
  • Shortly before the due date
  • After submission
  • After grading
Q13
의견 척도

How useful was the rubric in helping you understand how to improve your work?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q14
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your rubric experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q15
드롭다운

What is your primary field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Business
  • Education
  • Engineering & Computer Science
  • Health Professions
  • Natural Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Undeclared
  • Other
Q16
의견 척도

The criteria in the rubric were relevant to the learning objectives of the assignment.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • Under 18
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
의견 척도

The performance levels in the rubric (e.g., excellent, good, needs improvement) were clearly distinguished from one another.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q19
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Man
  • Woman
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

I was able to use the rubric to assess my own work before submitting.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q21
의견 척도

The grade I received aligned with how I understood the rubric criteria.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes dedicated opinion-scale items isolating rubric clarity, fairness, usefulness for improvement, and criteria-objective alignment — not just general course satisfaction
  • Pairs closed-ended rubric ratings with a ranking question on preferred rubric improvements and an open-text reflection, giving both quantifiable and qualitative signal
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe student reasoning behind their rubric ratings in depth, something static form builders cannot do
  • Captures context (rubric type, assignment type, timing of receipt) and demographics so researchers can segment rubric perceptions by course/field/study level

Jotform

E-learning Student Performance Evaluation Form Template

A general e-learning performance evaluation form rather than a rubric-specific perception survey; it targets broader student performance/course evaluation rather than isolating rubric clarity, fairness, or usefulness. Useful as a customizable static form but not purpose-built for rubric quality research.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use drag-and-drop form template within a widely used form builder
  • Likely supports broad customization of fields and branding for e-learning contexts
  • Familiar interface for instructors already using Jotform for course administration

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe why a rubric felt unclear or unfair
  • Not focused on rubric-specific constructs (clarity, fairness, usefulness, criteria-objective alignment)
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

A course/teacher evaluation template aimed at overall course quality and instructor performance, not specifically at grading rubric perceptions. It's a reasonable adjacent tool for academic researchers but requires significant editing to focus on rubric clarity and fairness. Presented as a sample question set/template rather than a rubric-focused instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with course/teacher evaluation question banks
  • Likely offers standard analytics dashboards and reporting for closed-ended responses
  • Template designed with academic researchers and course designers in mind

아쉬운 점

  • No rubric-specific question set covering criteria relevance, performance-level clarity, or self-assessment ability
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to explore student reasoning beyond scaled/multiple-choice answers
  • No transparent, published methodology for how any follow-up probing or scoring would work, since none is offered

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기