QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Teacher Job Satisfaction & Retention Pulse Survey

Tracks how satisfied teachers are with workload, administrative support, pay, resources, and school culture, and flags retention risk before it shows up in resignation letters. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind each teacher's rating instead of settling for a number. Built for school leaders and district HR running an annual or mid-year staff pulse.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how things are really going at school. Your answers are used to improve support for teachers — nothing here is tied to your performance review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 6 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with your job as a teacher right now?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q03
매트릭스필수

How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your current role?

7개 행 × 5개 열
  • Workload and hours
  • Administrative support
  • Compensation and benefits
  • Availability of teaching materials and resources
  • Professional development opportunities
  • 외 2개
열: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q04
객관식필수

In the last month, how often did you have to work outside your contracted hours (grading, planning, or admin tasks) just to keep up?

  • Never
  • A few days a month
  • About once a week
  • Several times a week
  • Almost every day
Q05
평점 척도

The last time you needed help with a classroom or behavioral challenge, how would you rate the support you got from school administration?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:No help at all최대:Extremely helpful
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these changes would do the most to improve your job satisfaction — and which would matter least?

  • Higher pay or better benefits
  • Smaller class sizes
  • More paid planning time
  • More administrative support
  • Better classroom materials and resources
  • A more manageable overall workload
  • More input on curriculum decisions
  • Better mentoring or coaching
  • Improved student behavior support
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would help the most최악:Would help the least
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend teaching at this school to a colleague looking for a job?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Anchor on the respondent's recommend-to-a-colleague score and their workload rating. If the score is low (0-6), get a specific recent example of what made them hesitate — a particular week, incident, or unmet need — and ask what would need to change for that to improve. If the score is high (7-10), find out what specifically is working well so it can be protected or replicated elsewhere. Always probe whether workload or lack of administrative support played a role, and note any mention of considering leaving the profession or the school.

Q09
객관식필수

How likely are you to still be teaching at this school next school year?

  • Very unlikely
  • Somewhat unlikely
  • Not sure
  • Somewhat likely
  • Very likely
Q10
드롭다운

How many years have you been teaching, including this year?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

What grade level do you primarily teach?

  • Early childhood / Pre-K
  • Elementary (K-5)
  • Middle school (6-8)
  • High school (9-12)
  • Multiple levels / Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Long-term substitute
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for your honesty — this really helps. Responses are compiled into a school-wide report on teacher support and retention, and no individual answers are shared with your direct supervisor.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score by pairing an overall rating with a matrix breakdown of workload, admin support, pay, resources, and culture
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that anchors on each teacher's recommend-to-a-colleague score and workload rating to dig into the actual incident behind a low score, not just the number
  • Uses a max-diff question to force-rank which specific changes would most improve satisfaction, giving school leaders a prioritized action list instead of a vague sentiment score
  • Directly asks retention-signal questions (likelihood to still be teaching next year, recommend-to-a-colleague) alongside tenure and role context, so flight-risk staff can be flagged before a resignation letter

Jotform

Teacher Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form template covering standard teacher satisfaction topics, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and deploy quickly but relies on fixed questions rather than any adaptive follow-up. Best suited for teams that want a simple, no-frills satisfaction check rather than deeper diagnostic insight.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy and customize using a familiar drag-and-drop builder
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (notifications, storage, integrations)

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a low rating
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or generated report tying scores to specific incidents

SurveySparrow

Teacher Satisfaction Survey

SurveySparrow's template offers a conversational-style survey format, which makes the experience feel less clinical than a typical form. It covers common satisfaction dimensions but the flow is still pre-scripted rather than dynamically driven by each respondent's answers. Useful for a friendlier survey feel, but not a substitute for a true follow-up interview.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-style UI that can feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting and distribution tools

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational tone does not equate to adaptive AI probing — question sequence is still pre-set, not tailored to each answer
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for deeper qualitative context

Typeform

Teacher Satisfaction Survey Form

Typeform's template delivers its signature one-question-at-a-time interface, which tends to boost completion rates for straightforward satisfaction surveys. It's a polished, ready-to-field form, but like other form builders it collects static responses without any mechanism to dig deeper into a specific low score. Good for a clean, simple pulse check rather than root-cause analysis.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, well-known one-question-at-a-time UX that's fast to fill out
  • Easy to launch with minimal setup for a standard satisfaction pulse

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific incident behind a rating
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of individual responses

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기