모든 템플릿

Weekly App & Web Performance Pulse Survey

A recurring pulse survey for collecting structured user feedback on app or website speed, uptime, and error frequency over a 7-day window. Designed for product and engineering teams seeking to prioritize performance improvements and track reliability trends.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 20개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to our weekly performance feedback survey. This short survey asks about your experience with speed, availability, and errors over the past 7 days. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we're interested in your honest experience. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate to guide performance improvements. Estimated time: 10 minutes.

Q02
객관식

In the last 7 days, on how many days did you use the product?

  • 0 days
  • 1–2 days
  • 3–4 days
  • 5–7 days
Q03
의견 척도

Overall, how fast did the product feel in the last 7 days?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely slow최대:Extremely fast
Q04
객관식

Which best describes the product's availability for you over the last 7 days?

  • No outages; always available
  • Minor slowdowns only
  • One short outage (under 30 minutes)
  • Multiple outages
  • Not sure
Q05
객관식

In the last 7 days, how often did you encounter errors (e.g., crashes, error messages, or failed actions)?

  • Never
  • Once
  • 2–3 times
  • Daily
  • Multiple times per day
Q06
의견 척도

How would you rate the product's overall reliability in the last 7 days?

척도: 17
최소:Very unreliable최대:Very reliable
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, we'd like to explore your recent performance experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q08
드롭다운

What is your primary role?

  • Product management
  • Engineering
  • Design or UX
  • Data or Analytics
  • Customer support or Success
  • Operations
  • Executive or Leadership
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for your time — your feedback directly helps us prioritize performance improvements!

Q10
객관식

Which platform did you primarily use in the last 7 days?

  • iOS app
  • Android app
  • Web browser
  • Desktop application
  • API or integrations
  • Multiple equally
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

In which areas, if any, did you notice slowdowns in the last 7 days? Select all that apply.

  • App start-up
  • Page or screen loads
  • Search
  • Scrolling
  • Navigation between screens
  • Data sync or save
  • Uploads or downloads
  • I didn't notice any slowdowns
Q12
드롭다운

What was the typical length of the outage(s) you experienced?

  • Not applicable — no outages
  • Under 5 minutes
  • 5–15 minutes
  • 15–30 minutes
  • 30–60 minutes
  • Over 1 hour
  • Varied or unsure
Q13
객관식

What types of errors did you encounter? Select all that apply.

  • Not applicable — no errors
  • Crash or freeze
  • Server error or timeout
  • Page not found or access denied
  • Form or input validation error
  • Data sync or merge conflict
  • Payment or billing error
  • Other
Q14
객관식

Compared with the previous week, how would you describe overall performance?

  • Much worse
  • Slightly worse
  • About the same
  • Slightly better
  • Much better
  • Not sure / first week
Q15
드롭다운

How long have you been using this product?

  • Under 1 month
  • 1–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
장문형

Please describe a recent moment that felt slow — what were you trying to do, and what happened?

Q17
객관식

When did the outage(s) tend to occur? Select all that apply.

  • Not applicable — no outages
  • Morning
  • Midday or afternoon
  • Evening
  • Overnight
  • Varied or unsure
Q18
드롭다운

Approximately how long did it take to recover from or work around your most recent error?

  • Not applicable — no errors
  • Under 1 minute
  • 1–5 minutes
  • 5–15 minutes
  • 15–30 minutes
  • 30–60 minutes
  • Over 1 hour
  • Could not recover
Q19
순위 매기기

Please rank the following areas by improvement priority (drag the most important to the top).

  1. Speed
  2. Uptime or availability
  3. Fewer errors
  4. Stability under load
  5. Sync reliability
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q20
드롭다운

What is your company size?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured multiple-choice, opinion-scale, and dropdown questions on speed, uptime, outages, and error frequency with an open-text question asking users to describe a specific slow moment in detail
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively explores each respondent's actual answers, going beyond fixed-choice options to surface root causes and context
  • Captures role, tenure, and company size as segmentation fields so product and engineering teams can slice reliability trends by user type
  • Ends with a ranking question so teams get a prioritized, quantifiable list of which performance areas to fix first, not just raw sentiment

Jotform

300+ Performance Tracking Forms

This is a broad category page listing many performance-tracking form templates rather than a single ready-to-field weekly pulse survey for app/web reliability. It's useful as a starting point to pick and customize a static form, but requires manual selection and editing to match a 7-day performance/error/uptime cadence. No indication of adaptive questioning or automated scoring.

잘하는 점

  • Large library offering many customizable form templates to choose from
  • Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows easy field customization
  • Likely includes logic/branching features common to Jotform forms

아쉬운 점

  • A static form library, not a purpose-built recurring performance pulse survey
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe vague or negative responses
  • No visible automated quality scoring or auto-generated reporting on responses

QuestionPro

Website Feedback Survey Template

A ready-to-use template focused on general website feedback (usability, satisfaction, navigation) rather than a recurring 7-day performance/uptime/error tracking pulse. It's relevant to the broader website-feedback space but not structured around speed, outages, and error-recovery time like our template. Good for general UX sentiment, less suited to engineering-focused reliability tracking.

잘하는 점

  • Pre-built, fielding-ready website feedback template
  • Covers general usability and satisfaction dimensions
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics

아쉬운 점

  • No apparent focus on outage duration, error types, or recovery time specific to performance/reliability
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.