QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Preschool Teacher & Staff Performance Evaluation

A parent- and guardian-facing evaluation of a child's preschool teacher and classroom staff, covering communication, safety, warmth, and learning quality. Built for center directors gathering input for staff performance reviews, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs one specific recent interaction instead of vague praise or complaints.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on your child's teacher and classroom staff. Your honest answers help our director coach and support the team — this takes about 5 minutes, and your responses are kept confidential.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with your child's lead teacher?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q03
매트릭스필수

How would you rate the teacher and classroom staff on each of the following?

5개 행 × 3개 열
  • Communicates about my child's day
  • Shows warmth and patience with children
  • Supervises children safely
  • Plans engaging, age-appropriate activities
  • Handles behavior issues fairly and calmly
열: Needs improvement · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q04
객관식필수

In the last month, how often did you receive an update from the teacher about your child's day?

  • Daily
  • A few times a week
  • About once a week
  • Rarely
  • Never
Q05
평점 척도

When you've reached out with a question or concern, how would you rate the teacher's responsiveness?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this classroom and teacher to another family at this preschool?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
객관식

Which areas, if any, would most improve this teacher's performance?

  • Daily communication with families
  • Classroom safety practices
  • Behavior management
  • Learning activities and curriculum
  • Responsiveness to parent concerns
Q08
순위 매기기

Rank these staff development priorities in order of importance for improving your child's classroom experience.

  1. More frequent daily communication
  2. Additional safety training
  3. Behavior management training
  4. Curriculum and activity planning
  5. Parent-teacher conferences
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct one specific, recent interaction the parent had with this teacher or classroom staff — what happened, how the teacher handled it, and how the parent felt about the outcome. Anchor on their recommendation likelihood and satisfaction ratings: if either was low, dig into the exact moment that drove it and what a good resolution would have looked like; if both were high, identify the specific behavior worth reinforcing so it can be shared as feedback with the teacher.

Q10
객관식

What age group is your child in at this preschool?

  • Infant
  • Toddler
  • Preschool (3-4 years)
  • Pre-K (4-5 years)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How long has your child been in this teacher's classroom?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • More than 1 year
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback will be summarized for our director and used to support and coach our teaching staff, with individual responses kept confidential.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix rating of teacher and classroom staff across multiple dimensions (communication, safety, warmth, learning quality) rather than a single overall score
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct one specific, recent interaction the parent had with the teacher, replacing vague praise or complaints with concrete detail
  • Captures both quantitative satisfaction and recommendation metrics (opinion scale) alongside qualitative context like update frequency and responsiveness to concerns
  • Closes with a ranking of staff development priorities and open-ended improvement areas, giving directors actionable, prioritized input for performance reviews

Jotform

Preschool Staff Evaluation Form Template

A static, form-builder-style template for evaluating preschool staff, easy to customize with Jotform's drag-and-drop editor and embed on a center's site. It relies on fixed rating questions and text fields rather than any adaptive follow-up, so nuance in parent feedback depends entirely on how well the form fields are pre-designed. Good for quick deployment, but reporting and analysis are manual or dependent on separate Jotform add-ons.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize and brand within Jotform's form builder
  • Simple for parents to fill out quickly
  • Can be embedded or shared via link with minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — all questions are fixed at design time
  • No mechanism to reconstruct specific interactions; relies on open text boxes that often yield vague comments
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated director-ready reports

SurveySparrow

Preschool Staff Evaluation Form Template

SurveySparrow offers a conversational-style survey template for preschool staff evaluation, which improves completion rates over plain forms through its chat-like UI. It still uses pre-set question flows rather than true adaptive interviewing, so it can't probe deeper based on a parent's specific answer. Reporting is dashboard-based rather than narrative, director-ready summaries.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational UI likely improves parent completion rates versus a traditional form
  • Supports branching logic for basic personalization
  • Mobile-friendly presentation suited to parents filling it out on phones

아쉬운 점

  • Branching logic is rule-based, not an AI-driven adaptive interview that reconstructs a specific interaction
  • No voice AI interview option for parents who prefer speaking over typing
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses

Typeform

Preschool Teacher Evaluation Form Template

Typeform's preschool teacher evaluation template uses its signature one-question-at-a-time design, which tends to feel more personal and reduce drop-off compared to dense grid forms. Like other form builders, questions are static once published, with no capability to dynamically follow up on a parent's specific answer. Useful for structured feedback collection, but summarization into a staff-review-ready report requires manual work or separate integrations.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, one-question-at-a-time interface that reduces respondent fatigue
  • Strong design customization to match a preschool's branding
  • Wide range of native question types (rating, multiple choice, opinion scale) for structured feedback

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing — the flow is fixed logic, not a real-time follow-up conversation
  • No option for voice-based interviews or guided screen-share tasks
  • No built-in automated scoring or auto-generated performance reports for directors

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기