모든 템플릿

Feature Deprecation Stakeholder Impact Survey

Assesses stakeholder usage patterns, anticipated disruption, and transition readiness before sunsetting a product feature. Designed for product and change-management teams planning deprecation with data-driven mitigation.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for participating. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes and asks about your experience with [Feature Name] to help us plan any changes responsibly. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest perspective. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

How long have you been using this product?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3+ years
Q03
의견 척도

If this feature were removed today, how disruptive would that be to your work over the next 3 months?

척도: 17
최소:No disruption at all최대:Severe disruption
Q04
객관식

Do you already have a workaround or alternative?

  • Yes — clear alternative(s) ready
  • Partial workaround
  • No — unsure of alternatives
  • Not needed — we don't rely on this feature
Q05
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else we should know about your use cases, constraints, or risks related to this feature's potential removal?

Q06
객관식

What is your primary role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead or manager
  • Executive or owner
  • Consultant or contractor
  • Other
Q07
메시지

Thank you for your time. Your feedback will directly inform our deprecation plan and transition support. If you have questions or concerns, please contact [team email].

Q08
객관식

How often do you currently use this feature?

  • Weekly or more
  • About monthly
  • Used in the past, not currently
  • Never used
Q09
객관식

If the feature is deprecated, which of the following areas would be significantly impacted for you or your team? (Select all that apply)

  • Day-to-day workflow efficiency
  • Data access or reporting
  • Compliance or audit readiness
  • Team collaboration
  • Customer-facing operations
  • Integration with other tools
  • None of the above
Q10
객관식

Which alternatives would you likely use? (Select all that apply)

  • Another built-in feature
  • Third-party tool or plug-in
  • Internal/custom-built tool
  • API-based integration
  • Manual steps or process change
  • Defer or stop doing the task
  • Other (please specify)
Q11
객관식

What is your organization's size (number of employees)?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
Q12
객관식

When did you last use this feature?

  • Within the last week
  • 2–4 weeks ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • 3–6 months ago
  • Over 6 months ago
Q13
의견 척도

How confident are you that your team could maintain current productivity if this feature were removed?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q14
순위 매기기

Drag to rank your top 3 considerations when choosing an alternative (top = most important).

  1. Feature parity
  2. Setup effort
  3. Ongoing cost
  4. Security or compliance
  5. Data migration ease
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q15
드롭다운

Which industry best describes your organization?

  • Technology
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • Retail or eCommerce
  • Manufacturing
  • Government or Nonprofit
  • Other
Q16
객관식

Which activities has this feature supported for you? (Select all that apply)

  • Data export or reporting
  • Automation or scheduling
  • Integration with other tools
  • Navigation or discovery
  • Collaboration or sharing
  • Compliance or audit needs
  • Troubleshooting or diagnostics
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
AI 인터뷰

You mentioned how this feature's removal might affect you. Can you walk us through a specific scenario where losing this feature would create a problem for your workflow?

Q18
객관식

What support would be most helpful during a transition? (Select all that apply)

  • How-to guides or tutorials
  • Migration checklist
  • One-on-one assistance
  • Sample scripts or templates
  • API documentation
  • Temporary overlap period
  • Change log and notifications
  • Community forum thread
Q19
드롭다운

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East or Africa
  • Other
Q20
의견 척도

How helpful would a 60-day overlap period — where both the old and new options are available — be for your transition?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all helpful최대:Extremely helpful
Q21
드롭다운

What is the minimum notice period you would need before this feature is removed?

  • Less than 2 weeks
  • 2–4 weeks
  • 1–2 months
  • 3 months
  • 6 months
  • More than 6 months

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that adapts in real time to a stakeholder's stated disruption concerns, going beyond a fixed question list
  • Pairs quantitative opinion-scale questions (disruption level, confidence in maintaining productivity, value of a 60-day overlap) with open-ended and ranking questions to surface both scale and nuance of transition readiness
  • Segments respondents by role, org size, industry, and region so product and change-management teams can see which stakeholder groups face the most disruption
  • Closes with an open-text catch-all and a dropdown on minimum notice period, giving teams concrete transition-planning inputs alongside a free tier and $50/mo Business plan (no academic tier)

SurveyMonkey

Product Feature Survey Template

A general-purpose fielding-ready template for gauging reactions to a product feature, likely covering satisfaction and usage rather than deprecation-specific transition risk. Useful as a starting point but would need heavy customization to capture disruption impact, workaround readiness, or notice-period needs. No deprecation or change-management framing is evident.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-launch template on an established survey platform
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's broad question-bank and reporting tools
  • Easy to customize for general feature feedback

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to probe individual disruption stories
  • Not purpose-built for deprecation/transition planning (notice periods, overlap windows, workarounds)
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized

Jotform

Product Usage Survey Template

A ready-to-use form focused on capturing how and how often a product is used, which overlaps with the usage-pattern portion of a deprecation survey but stops short of assessing disruption or transition readiness. It's a static form builder template rather than an interview experience. Good for baseline usage data, not for the qualitative depth needed around change impact.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy usage-tracking form
  • Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows easy field customization
  • Supports standard question types like multiple choice and dropdowns

아쉬운 점

  • No mechanism to explore why a change would be disruptive beyond static questions
  • Lacks any AI-driven follow-up or voice interview option
  • No transition-planning fields like notice period or overlap-period preference

QuestionPro

Product Evaluation Survey Template and Sample Questionnaire

A fielding-ready questionnaire aimed at evaluating overall product satisfaction and feature value, which is adjacent to but not focused on the risk of removing a specific feature. It provides sample questions and structure but no built-in path for capturing workaround plans or stakeholder-specific transition support needs. Best suited to general evaluation rather than deprecation impact assessment.

잘하는 점

  • Sample questionnaire gives a documented question structure to start from
  • Established survey platform with reporting and analytics
  • Supports multiple question types typical of evaluation surveys

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up on individual disruption concerns
  • Not tailored to deprecation-specific decisions like notice period or overlap windows
  • No transparent per-response quality scoring or prompt methodology disclosed

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.