모든 템플릿

ICE Scoring: Roadmap Prioritization Assessment

Enables cross-functional stakeholders to evaluate roadmap initiatives on Impact, Confidence, and Ease dimensions, producing quantified ICE priority scores alongside qualitative risk and rationale data.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 31개 · 약 13분
Q01
메시지

<p>Welcome to the Roadmap Prioritization Assessment.</p><p>You will evaluate four proposed initiatives on three dimensions: Impact, Confidence, and Ease (ICE). Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate to inform roadmap decisions.</p><p>There are no right or wrong answers—we value your honest assessment. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. This survey should take approximately 10 minutes.</p><p><strong>Note to survey owner:</strong> Replace 'Bet A–D' labels with your actual initiative names before distributing.</p>

Q02
의견 척도

How closely are you involved in roadmap planning decisions?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all involved최대:Deeply involved
Q03
의견 척도

How familiar are you with Bet A?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q04
의견 척도

How familiar are you with Bet B?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q05
의견 척도

How familiar are you with Bet C?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q06
의견 척도

How familiar are you with Bet D?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q07
순위 매기기

Rank the following initiatives from highest to lowest priority for the next cycle.

  1. Bet A
  2. Bet B
  3. Bet C
  4. Bet D
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
장문형

Is there anything else we should consider when sequencing or timing these initiatives?

Q09
객관식

What is your primary role?

  • Product Management
  • Engineering
  • Design/UX
  • Data/Analytics
  • Marketing
  • Sales
  • Customer Support/Success
  • Operations
  • Leadership/Executive
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지

Thank you for your input. Your responses will be aggregated and used to inform roadmap prioritization for the upcoming cycle.

Q11
의견 척도

Bet A — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

척도: 17
최소:Negligible impact최대:Transformative impact
Q12
의견 척도

Bet B — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

척도: 17
최소:Negligible impact최대:Transformative impact
Q13
의견 척도

Bet C — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

척도: 17
최소:Negligible impact최대:Transformative impact
Q14
의견 척도

Bet D — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

척도: 17
최소:Negligible impact최대:Transformative impact
Q15
객관식

If only one initiative could be funded this quarter, which would you choose?

  • Bet A
  • Bet B
  • Bet C
  • Bet D
  • None of the above
Q16
AI 인터뷰

Based on your prioritization above, please share your reasoning. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions to better understand your thinking.

Q17
객관식

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
의견 척도

Bet A — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncertain최대:Very confident
Q19
의견 척도

Bet B — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncertain최대:Very confident
Q20
의견 척도

Bet C — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncertain최대:Very confident
Q21
의견 척도

Bet D — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncertain최대:Very confident
Q22
의견 척도

How confident are you in the overall prioritization you provided above?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Very confident
Q23
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
의견 척도

Bet A — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely difficult최대:Very easy
Q25
의견 척도

Bet B — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely difficult최대:Very easy
Q26
의견 척도

Bet C — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely difficult최대:Very easy
Q27
의견 척도

Bet D — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely difficult최대:Very easy
Q28
장문형

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet A?

Q29
장문형

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet B?

Q30
장문형

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet C?

Q31
장문형

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet D?

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Scores every initiative (Bet A–D) across all three ICE dimensions — Impact, Confidence, and Ease — using dedicated opinion-scale questions, not just a single composite risk rating
  • Pairs each quantitative ICE score with a matching open-text question capturing risks, dependencies, and assumptions for that specific initiative, so scores come with rationale attached
  • Includes a ranking question and a forced single-choice 'if only one could be funded' question that let you cross-validate the calculated ICE scores against stakeholders' gut prioritization
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes the reasoning behind a respondent's prioritization, plus role, region, and tenure segmentation to see how views differ by stakeholder type

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.