Seminar Registration Interest & Topic Fit Survey
Gauges why professionals are weighing whether to register for your seminar, which session topics and formats matter most, and what price feels fair — built for event, association, and marketing teams planning a conference, workshop, or webinar series. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reason a likely-to-attend score is high or low, beyond a checkbox answer.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How did you first hear about this seminar?
- Email invitation
- Social media
- Colleague or referral
- Company website
- Search engine
- Industry publication or newsletter
Which best describes your primary reason for considering this seminar?
- Learn new skills or techniques
- Network with industry peers
- Earn continuing education credits
- Explore vendor or product solutions
- Represent my company or team
Which of these seminar topics would you most want covered, and which matters least to you? (Template note: replace these with your seminar's actual session topics before launching.)
- Industry trend analysis
- Regulatory & compliance updates
- Case studies from peer companies
- Hands-on tools & techniques
- Panel Q&A with experts
- Structured networking opportunities
- New product or vendor showcases
Which format would work best for you to attend?
- In person at a physical venue
- Fully virtual or live-streamed
- Hybrid (choice of either)
- No strong preference
Which day and time would you most likely be able to attend? (Template note: replace with your actual proposed dates/slots before launching.)
- Weekday morning
- Weekday afternoon
- Weekday evening
- Weekend
Now a few quick questions about pricing for this seminar.
- At what registration price would you consider this seminar so inexpensive that you'd question its quality?
- At what registration price would you consider this seminar a bargain and great value?
- At what registration price would this seminar start to feel expensive, though you'd still consider attending?
- At what registration price would this seminar be so expensive that you would not consider attending?
Based on what you know so far, how likely are you to register for this seminar?
Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-register score. If it's low-to-moderate, uncover the specific barrier — price, timing, relevance, or format — holding them back and what would need to change to move the score higher. If it's high, confirm which single topic or factor is the deciding driver and whether anything could still cause them to cancel closer to the date. Anchor the conversation on their top-ranked topic and preferred format to keep it concrete.
Which industry best describes your organization?
- Technology
- Healthcare
- Financial services
- Manufacturing
- Education
- Government or nonprofit
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How many employees work at your organization?
- 1-50
- 51-250
- 251-1000
- 1000+
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your input will directly shape the seminar's topics, format, schedule, and pricing before we finalize registration.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a simple registration form to gauge genuine interest with a likelihood-to-register scale, MaxDiff topic ranking, format and scheduling preferences, and a Van Westendorp pricing exercise, all in one flow
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes why a respondent's likelihood-to-register score is high or low, surfacing objections or motivators a static form would never capture
- Built for event, association, and marketing teams deciding what to program and how to price it, not just for collecting names and contact details
- Captures firmographic context (industry, company size, how they heard about the seminar) so planners can segment interest by audience type
Jotform
E-seminar Student Registration Form TemplateThis is a student-focused e-seminar sign-up form for collecting attendee details, not a survey designed to gauge interest, topic fit, or pricing sensitivity. It's a fielding-ready form builder template, but oriented toward registration logistics rather than research. Audience fit (students) also differs from the professional/B2B event-planning use case.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use drag-and-drop form for collecting registrant contact and enrollment details
- Part of Jotform's broad template library so it can be customized quickly
- Simple, low-friction format suited to straightforward sign-ups
아쉬운 점
- Built for capturing registrations, not for measuring likelihood-to-attend, topic preference, or price sensitivity
- No adaptive follow-up questioning to explore why someone would or wouldn't register
- No published methodology for scoring or interpreting responses
SurveyMonkey
Seminar Registration Form TemplateA standard registration form template aimed at collecting attendee sign-up information for a seminar. It's fielding-ready but functions as an intake form rather than a research instrument for testing topic fit or price sensitivity. Useful for logistics, less suited to informing program design decisions.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with reliable form logic and distribution tools
- Easy to deploy for basic registration collection
- Familiar interface for respondents and survey admins
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into the reasoning behind attendance intent
- Not structured to test topic prioritization (e.g., MaxDiff) or pricing thresholds (e.g., Van Westendorp)
- No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
Typeform
Free Seminar Registration Form TemplateA conversational-style registration form for signing people up to a seminar, emphasizing a clean UI and step-by-step flow. It's built for capturing registrant information, not for probing why someone is or isn't inclined to attend or what price feels fair. Fielding-ready as a sign-up form, but not a topic-fit or pricing research tool.
잘하는 점
- Polished, mobile-friendly conversational form experience
- Quick to launch with Typeform's template gallery
- Good completion rates typical of Typeform's one-question-at-a-time design
아쉬운 점
- No branching AI interview to explore the reasoning behind a likelihood-to-register score
- No built-in topic-ranking (MaxDiff) or pricing sensitivity (Van Westendorp) question types
- No transparent, published prompt logic or automated response scoring
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.