Patient-Provider Fit & Care Preference Assessment
Measures patient-provider alignment across clinical, communication, and access dimensions to identify mismatch drivers and care preferences. Designed for healthcare organizations, insurers, or researchers seeking to improve provider matching and patient retention.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Have you seen a healthcare provider for your own care in the past 6 months?
- Yes
- No
What type of healthcare provider did you most recently see?
- Primary care physician
- Specialist
- Mental health professional
- OB/GYN
- Urgent care or retail clinic
- Telehealth clinician
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how well did this provider fit your healthcare needs?
Please rank the following factors by how important they are to you when choosing a healthcare provider, from most to least important.
- Clinical expertise in my condition
- Communication style
- Cultural understanding
- Location or convenience
- Appointment availability
- Cost transparency
- Provider gender
What, if anything, would have improved the fit between you and this provider?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help improve how patients are matched with healthcare providers. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team at the email provided in your invitation.
Which of the following reasons apply to why you have not seen a provider? Select all that apply.
- Could not get an appointment
- No need for care
- Cost or coverage concerns
- Transportation or distance
- Unsure where to go
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How did you choose this provider? Select all that apply.
- Referred by another clinician
- Chose from insurance network list
- Friend or family recommendation
- Online reviews or search
- Assigned by clinic or insurer
- I already knew this provider
- Other (please specify)
How easy was it to get an appointment that met your scheduling needs?
How would you most prefer to search for a well-matched provider?
- Insurance directory with filters
- Independent review site
- Clinician referral
- Community organization recommendations
- Personalized matching app or tool
- Other (please specify)
Based on your earlier responses, we'd like to explore your patient–provider fit experiences in a bit more depth. Please share your thoughts, and our moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
Which gender best describes you?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
In the past 6 months, approximately how many visits did you have with this provider?
- 1
- 2
- 3–4
- 5–6
- 7 or more
- Unsure
This provider listened carefully to my concerns.
How confident are you that you could find a well-matched provider if you needed one?
What is your highest level of education?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college
- Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
This provider explained things in a way I could understand.
How do you primarily pay for healthcare?
- Employer-sponsored insurance
- Individual or marketplace plan
- Medicare
- Medicaid or public program
- Military/VA
- Uninsured or self-pay
- Prefer not to say
This provider involved me in decisions about my care.
What is your preferred language for receiving healthcare?
- English
- Spanish
- Chinese (Mandarin or Cantonese)
- Vietnamese
- Tagalog
- Arabic
- French
- Korean
- Another language
- Prefer not to say
This provider showed respect for my background and preferences.
In which region do you usually receive healthcare?
- U.S. — Northeast
- U.S. — Southeast
- U.S. — Midwest
- U.S. — Southwest
- U.S. — West
- U.S. — Pacific (HI, AK)
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- European Union
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Which of the following, if any, were areas of mismatch with this provider? Select all that apply.
- Clinical approach not aligned with my preferences
- Limited appointment times
- Communication style didn't suit me
- Language barrier
- Cultural sensitivity lacking
- Location or travel inconvenient
- Insurance or billing issues
- Provider gender preference not met
- Costs higher than expected
- No mismatches
- Other (please specify)
Do you plan to continue seeing this provider for similar healthcare needs?
- Yes
- No, I plan to switch
- Unsure
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes patient–provider fit themes surfaced earlier in the survey, rather than stopping at fixed-choice questions
- Combines quantitative opinion-scale ratings (listening, respect, involvement in decisions, scheduling ease) with a ranking exercise and open-text feedback to capture both the size and the reasons for mismatch
- Captures structured mismatch drivers (communication, access, clinical fit) alongside demographic and payment/language context needed for equity-focused provider-matching analysis
- Ends with an automated report generation step, so healthcare organizations or researchers get synthesized findings without manually coding open-ended responses
Jotform
600+ Healthcare Assessment FormsThis is a broad category/library page listing hundreds of generic healthcare assessment form templates rather than a single fielding-ready patient-provider fit survey. It's useful for finding intake, screening, or satisfaction forms quickly, but none appear purpose-built to isolate mismatch drivers across clinical, communication, and access dimensions. Customization is drag-and-drop form building rather than adaptive interviewing.
잘하는 점
- Very large library of pre-built healthcare form templates covering many use cases
- Familiar drag-and-drop form builder likely speeds up basic customization
- Broad reach across many healthcare sub-topics (intake, consent, satisfaction, etc.)
아쉬운 점
- Static question sets with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
- No built-in voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- As a general template hub, no template appears specifically structured around patient-provider fit, mismatch drivers, or care-preference ranking; users would need to build/customize substantially
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.