모든 템플릿

Private Label vs Premium Splurge Trade-Off Survey

Measures where budget-pressured shoppers trade down to store brands and where they still splurge on premium products, using a best-worst trade-off exercise and a budget-allocation task to map real priorities. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the last splurge purchase to uncover the emotional vs. practical logic behind when 'worth it' actually wins. Built for CPG, retail, and pricing teams.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to talk about your grocery and shopping habits lately. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We're curious where you've cut back and where you still treat yourself — there are no wrong answers. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, has your household changed how much you spend on everyday groceries and household goods because of price increases or budget pressure?

  • Yes, cut back significantly
  • Yes, cut back a little
  • No real change
  • Actually spending more freely
Q03
객관식필수

Which of these categories have you switched from name-brand to store-brand or private label products in the last 3 months?

  • Grocery staples (pasta, rice, canned goods)
  • Snacks & beverages
  • Personal care (shampoo, soap, etc.)
  • Household cleaning supplies
  • Over-the-counter medicine
  • Baby or child products
  • Pet food or supplies
Q04
객관식필수

Even while cutting back elsewhere, which of these do you still splurge on name-brand or premium versions of?

  • Coffee
  • Skincare or beauty products
  • Alcohol
  • Specialty or gourmet food
  • Clothing or apparel
  • Electronics or tech
  • Restaurant or takeout meals
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you do choose a store-brand or private label product over a name-brand one, which of these reasons matters most and least to you?

  • It's noticeably cheaper
  • Quality is basically the same
  • I don't trust the brand name enough to pay more for it
  • It was recommended by someone I trust
  • It's what was in stock or available
  • I tried it out of curiosity and it worked out
  • The packaging or store display caught my attention
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q06
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about store-brand products?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Store-brand products perform as well as name-brand equivalents
  • I feel a little self-conscious buying store-brand in front of others
  • Store-brand packaging looks cheaper than name-brand
  • I'd recommend store-brand alternatives to a friend
  • Price is the only reason I buy store-brand
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
점수 배분필수

If you had $100 in discretionary (non-essential) spending this month, how would you divide it across these categories?

  • Groceries or food at home
  • Dining out or takeout
  • Personal care & beauty
  • Clothing & apparel
  • Entertainment & subscriptions
  • Treats or small indulgences (coffee, snacks, etc.)
100점 배분
Q08
의견 척도필수

If a premium brand you've switched away from lowered its price to match the store-brand alternative, how likely would you be to switch back?

척도: 110
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through the last time they bought their premium 'splurge' item — the one they still buy despite cutting back elsewhere: what triggered the purchase, how they felt, and whether they considered a cheaper alternative first. If they said they've cut back on everything, probe for the last small indulgence they allowed themselves and what made it feel justified. Anchor on the trade-off logic they use to decide when paying more is 'worth it' versus when it isn't.

Q10
평점 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with the store-brand or private label products you've tried as replacements?

범위: 15
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your household's total annual income?

  • Under $30,000
  • $30,000-$59,999
  • $60,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How many people live in your household, including yourself?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing how you're navigating your budget! Your answers help us understand where value-consciousness and premium spending coexist, and feed directly into a report on category-level trade-off behavior.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Uses a best-worst trade-off exercise and a $100 budget-allocation task to map which categories shoppers actually trade down on versus protect
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's last premium 'splurge' purchase to surface the emotional vs. practical reasoning behind 'worth it' moments
  • Pairs attitudinal matrix and satisfaction ratings on store-brand products with a price-parity opinion question to test brand switching elasticity
  • Captures household income, size, and age demographics alongside behavior data so CPG and pricing teams can segment trade-off patterns by budget pressure

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.