Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Likert Scale Statement Agreement Survey
A flexible agree-disagree battery for measuring attitudes toward a product, policy, workplace practice, or service — built around a classic multi-statement rating grid. Swap in your own statements, then let the AI follow-up dig into the reasoning behind whichever statement swayed the respondent's opinion most, closed or neutral answers included.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 10개 · 약 6분
Q02
매트릭스필수
How much do you agree or disagree with each statement below? (Template note: replace these five statements with the specific claims you want to test, e.g. about your product, workplace, or service.)
5개 행 × 5개 열
- (Replace with Statement 1, e.g. 'The onboarding process was easy to follow')
- (Replace with Statement 2, e.g. 'I received help quickly when I needed it')
- (Replace with Statement 3, e.g. 'The pricing feels fair for the value I get')
- (Replace with Statement 4, e.g. 'I would recommend this to a colleague')
- (Replace with Statement 5, e.g. 'This fits naturally into my daily routine')
열: Strongly Disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly Agree
Q03
의견 척도필수
Taking all of those statements together, how well do they reflect your overall experience?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all최대:Extremely well
Q04
객관식필수
Which single statement above had the biggest effect on your overall opinion, whether positive or negative?
- (Replace with Statement 1)
- (Replace with Statement 2)
- (Replace with Statement 3)
- (Replace with Statement 4)
- (Replace with Statement 5)
Q05
순위 매기기
Now rank all five statements from most important to least important in shaping your overall view.
- (Replace with Statement 1)
- (Replace with Statement 2)
- (Replace with Statement 3)
- (Replace with Statement 4)
- (Replace with Statement 5)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
AI 인터뷰
Ask the respondent to explain, in their own words, why the statement they picked as most influential earned the agreement or disagreement rating it did on the grid above. Anchor on specific examples or moments rather than general impressions. If their rating was 'Neutral' or they seem unsure, probe what would need to change to move them clearly toward agreement or disagreement.
Q07
장문형
Is there a statement we didn't ask about that you'd want us to include next time?
Q08
객관식
Which best describes your relationship to (Replace with the topic, e.g. 'this product/this workplace')?
- (Replace with Group A, e.g. 'New user, less than 3 months')
- (Replace with Group B, e.g. 'Established user, 3+ months')
- (Replace with Group C, e.g. 'Team lead/manager')
- Prefer not to say
Q09
객관식
What is your age range?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지
That's everything, thank you! Your ratings and the follow-up conversation will be combined into a report on which statements matter most and why.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a full multi-statement agree-disagree matrix that you customize with your own statements (product, policy, workplace, or service topic)
- Automatically identifies which statement swayed the respondent most via a dedicated multiple-choice question, then triggers an AI follow-up interview asking them to explain their reasoning in their own words
- Goes beyond the rating grid with an overall opinion-scale check, a full importance ranking of all statements, and an open-ended question inviting missing statements for next time
- Captures relationship-to-topic and age-range segmentation alongside the ratings, then auto-compiles everything -- scores, rankings, and interview transcript -- into one report
QuestionPro
Even Likert Scale Survey Questions TemplateThis is a template page focused specifically on even-point (forced-choice) Likert scales, with sample question wording researchers can adapt. It's fielding-ready within QuestionPro's survey builder but is oriented around scale construction rather than a specific attitude topic. No mention of any conversational or adaptive follow-up capability.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with broad question-type library and distribution tools
- Specifically addresses even-point Likert design, useful for avoiding neutral-midpoint bias
- Sample items are ready to adapt for many topics
아쉬운 점
- Static rating grid only -- no adaptive follow-up that probes why a specific statement drove the respondent's opinion
- No built-in mechanism to identify and dig into the most influential statement per respondent
- No transparent, published prompt logic since there's no AI-driven questioning at all
SurveyMonkey
Likert Scale Survey TemplateA general-purpose, fielding-ready Likert scale template from a major survey platform, intended as a broad starting point for agreement-style questions. It covers the core rating grid but doesn't appear tailored to isolating which statement matters most or exploring respondent reasoning. Backed by SurveyMonkey's wider analytics and distribution ecosystem.
잘하는 점
- Well-known, easy-to-use platform with strong distribution and panel options
- Template is ready to deploy quickly for a generic agreement survey
- Broad reporting and analytics dashboard integration
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to explore the reasoning behind a respondent's most influential rating
- No ranking or importance-weighting step to complement the rating grid
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology since there's no AI questioning layer
SurveySparrow
Free Likert Scale Questionnaire TemplateA customizable, fielding-ready Likert scale questionnaire aimed at business use cases, explicitly flexible across different scale point counts. It emphasizes ease of customization for the rating grid itself rather than deeper follow-up on respondent reasoning. Presented as a free template within SurveySparrow's conversational-style survey product.
잘하는 점
- Conversational survey format may feel more engaging than a static grid
- Customizable to different Likert scale lengths for varied use cases
- Free template lowers the barrier to quickly field a basic version
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into why a particular statement swayed opinion most
- No built-in ranking or open-ended gap-finding question about missing statements
- No documented per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.