모든 템플릿

Workplace Gender Inclusivity Experience Survey

Measures how included, fairly treated, and supported people of all genders feel at work — covering belonging, perceived fairness in promotions and pay, comfort reporting concerns, and which initiatives would help most — with an AI follow-up that surfaces the specific incidents and barriers behind the scores instead of vague sentiment. Built for HR, DEI, and people teams running culture pulse checks.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes for this. We're checking in on gender inclusivity in day-to-day work life here — your honest answers, positive or critical, are what make this useful. Fully confidential, about 6-7 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that people of all genders have equal opportunities to succeed at this company?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • I am treated fairly in meetings and discussions here
  • I have equal access to high-visibility projects and stretch assignments
  • I believe promotion decisions are made fairly regardless of gender
  • I believe pay decisions are made fairly regardless of gender
  • I feel comfortable being my authentic self at work
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 12 months, have you personally experienced or witnessed gender-based exclusion, bias, or unequal treatment at work?

  • Yes, I experienced it personally
  • Yes, I witnessed it happen to someone else
  • No
  • Not sure
Q05
평점 척도필수

How comfortable would you be raising a gender-related concern with HR or a manager here?

범위: 15
최소:Very uncomfortable최대:Very comfortable
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these would do the most, and the least, to improve gender inclusivity for you personally?

  • Flexible or extended parental leave
  • Transparent, published pay bands
  • Formal sponsorship for promotion opportunities
  • Bias-interruption training for managers
  • Structured mentorship programs
  • Active employee resource groups
  • Flexible or remote work arrangements
  • Structured return-to-work support after leave
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would improve my experience most최악:Would improve my experience least
Q07
평점 척도

How visible is senior leadership's commitment to gender inclusivity in actual day-to-day decisions, not just stated values?

범위: 15
최소:Not visible at all최대:Highly visible
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's confidence score and any exclusion they reported experiencing or witnessing: ask for a specific recent example, what happened, and how it was or wasn't addressed. If they scored high confidence and reported no incidents, explore what specifically makes the environment feel equitable so it can be reinforced elsewhere. If they flagged discomfort reporting concerns, dig into what would make reporting feel safer or more consequence-free.

Q09
장문형

Is there anything else about gender inclusivity at this company you'd like leadership to know?

Q10
메시지

Last few questions are about you — they help us spot patterns across groups. All are optional.

Q11
객관식

Which gender do you identify with?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary or genderqueer
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which broad function or department are you part of? (Template note: replace these categories with your organization's actual department list before launching.)

  • Engineering/Product
  • Sales/Marketing
  • Operations
  • People/HR
  • Finance/Legal
  • Customer Support
Q13
객관식

How long have you worked at this company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Your answers feed directly into a report on where gender inclusivity is working and where leadership needs to act, and no individual response will be shared on its own.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond scores with an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning behind confidence ratings and surfaces specific exclusion or incidents behind the numbers
  • Pairs a matrix of day-to-day experience statements with a MaxDiff question so teams see both how people feel and which initiatives would actually help most
  • Includes direct questions on comfort reporting concerns and visibility of leadership commitment, plus demographic breakdowns for spotting patterns across gender, department, and tenure
  • Closes with an open-ended question inviting anything else respondents want leadership to know, giving qualitative context the automated report can synthesize alongside scored data

SurveyMonkey

Gender Inclusivity At Work Survey Template

A fielding-ready template covering similar ground on gender inclusivity at work, from a well-established survey platform with broad distribution and analytics tools. It's a fixed question set rather than an adaptive interview, so all follow-up depends on additional static questions being pre-written.

잘하는 점

  • Established, widely-used survey platform with mature distribution and reporting features
  • Purpose-built template specifically for gender inclusivity, so no need to adapt an adjacent topic

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up, so respondents can't be probed in the moment on why they rated something a certain way
  • No voice interview option or automated per-response quality scoring
  • Doesn't publish the underlying question logic or prompts, so methodology transparency is limited

QuestionPro

Gender Discrimination Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

A questionnaire template focused specifically on gender discrimination, which overlaps with but is narrower than broad inclusivity, belonging, and fairness measurement. It reads as a sample question bank for adapting into a survey rather than a ready-to-send interactive interview experience.

잘하는 점

  • Focused set of questions specifically targeting discrimination experiences
  • Backed by a full survey platform with standard reporting and distribution tools

아쉬운 점

  • Static question list with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into the specifics behind a discrimination report
  • No guided task or screen-share capability, and no voice AI interview option
  • Narrower scope (discrimination) than a full inclusivity, fairness, and support experience survey

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.