모든 템플릿

Community Service Gaps & Priorities Assessment

A structured needs assessment for local governments and nonprofits to identify residents' service priorities, access barriers, and communication preferences to guide resource allocation.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 23개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Community Service Needs Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with local services, the issues that matter most to you, and any barriers you have encountered. Your honest opinions will help inform local planning and resource decisions. • Participation is entirely voluntary. You may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we want your genuine perspective. • Your responses are confidential and will only be reported in aggregate. • Estimated time: 8–10 minutes. Please read the consent question on the next screen to continue.

Q02
객관식

Which of the following community services have you personally used in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Healthcare/clinics
  • Mental health counseling
  • Public transit
  • Job training or employment services
  • Childcare/early learning
  • Housing assistance
  • Parks/recreation programs
  • Senior services
  • Library or public internet
  • Waste and recycling
  • Public safety services (non-emergency)
  • None of the above
  • Other
Q03
순위 매기기

Please rank the following local issues by priority for the next 12 months. Drag to reorder (1 = highest priority).

  1. Affordable housing
  2. Public safety (non-emergency)
  3. Healthcare access
  4. Mental health and substance use support
  5. Jobs and skills training
  6. Childcare/early learning
  7. Public transit and mobility
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q04
객관식

How would you prefer to hear about local services and events? Select all that apply.

  • Text/SMS
  • Email newsletters
  • Local social media groups
  • Posters/flyers in community spaces
  • Community organizations/faith groups
  • City or county website
  • Local newspaper/radio
  • Word of mouth
  • Other
Q05
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your experience with community services in more depth. Please share what has worked well or what could be improved, and our moderator will ask a few follow-up questions.

Q06
장문형

What is your ZIP or postal code?

Q07
메시지

Thank you for completing the survey. Your responses are confidential and will help inform local planning and resource allocation. If you have questions about this study, please contact [organization name and contact information].

Q08
객관식

Do you voluntarily agree to participate in this survey?

  • I agree to participate
  • I do not agree
Q09
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied were you with the community services you used in the last 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q10
의견 척도

How urgently do you feel local services need to change over the next 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all urgent최대:Extremely urgent
Q11
의견 척도

In the last 12 months, how easy or difficult has it been to reach the right office or person when you needed help?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q12
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your community's needs or services?

Q13
장문형

What is your neighborhood or nearest cross-streets? (optional)

Q14
객관식

Which best describes your connection to this community?

  • I live here
  • I don't live here, but I work or study here
  • I do not live, work, or study here
Q15
의견 척도

Thinking about the last 12 months, how easy or difficult was it overall to access the community services you needed?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q16
드롭다운

About how long do you usually travel one-way to reach the community services you use most?

  • Less than 10 minutes
  • 10–19 minutes
  • 20–29 minutes
  • 30–44 minutes
  • 45–59 minutes
  • 60 minutes or more
  • I don't travel to services (online/phone only)
  • Not applicable
Q17
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
객관식

Which barriers have you personally faced when trying to use community services in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Not aware of what's available
  • Hours don't fit my schedule
  • Transportation challenges
  • Cost or fees
  • Eligibility rules/documentation
  • Language barriers
  • Internet or device access
  • Childcare responsibilities
  • Physical accessibility
  • Concerns about privacy or stigma
  • Waitlists or delays
  • Staff responsiveness
  • Quality concerns
  • None of the above
  • Other
Q19
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some high school or less
  • High school diploma or GED
  • Some college/associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
객관식

What is your current employment situation? Select all that apply.

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Unemployed and looking
  • Student
  • Retired
  • Homemaker/caregiver
  • Unable to work
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
드롭다운

Including yourself, how many people live in your household?

  • 1 (just me)
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
드롭다운

How long have you lived in this community?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question so residents can elaborate in their own words on service gaps, going beyond fixed-choice answers
  • Combines quantitative opinion-scale questions (satisfaction, access difficulty, urgency, reaching officials) with a ranking exercise so priorities are directly comparable across respondents
  • Captures access-barrier specifics (travel time, communication preferences, barriers faced) needed to guide equitable resource allocation, not just general satisfaction
  • Ends with an open-text reflection question plus demographic/location fields, giving local governments both narrative context and segmentable data for reporting

SurveySparrow

Sample Community Needs Assessment Survey Template

A printable, ready-to-use community needs assessment template covering typical service-use and satisfaction questions. It's built as a static question set rather than an adaptive interview, so all respondents see the same fixed items regardless of their answers. Useful as a quick-start form but not designed for deeper follow-up probing.

잘하는 점

  • Printable format supports paper or in-person distribution alongside online use
  • Pre-built question set saves setup time for a standard needs assessment
  • Backed by a broader survey platform with reporting/dashboard features

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe deeper into open-ended answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of open text
  • No voice AI interview option for residents who prefer speaking over typing

Typeform

Online Community Needs Assessment Survey Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time survey template well suited to mobile completion and clean presentation. Logic can branch based on prior answers, but there is no AI-driven interviewing or automatic follow-up generation. Best suited to straightforward needs-assessment data collection rather than in-depth qualitative exploration.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, mobile-friendly conversational UI that can improve completion rates
  • Customizable branding and question flow
  • Conditional logic to route respondents based on answers

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview or automated follow-up probing on open responses
  • No published methodology for how question logic or scoring works
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative reports

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.