모든 템플릿

GMP Audit Checklist And Compliance Readiness Survey

A structured self-assessment for Good Manufacturing Practice audits — covering documentation, training, equipment, supplier qualification, validation, and CAPA management. An AI follow-up interview digs into the root cause behind your most significant finding, going beyond a pass/fail checklist to surface systemic issues before the next regulatory inspection.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking this GMP audit readiness check. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It covers documentation, training, equipment, suppliers, and corrective actions, plus a few follow-up questions about your most recent findings. About 6-8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

What type of audit or assessment does this response relate to?

  • Internal self-audit
  • Corporate/parent-company audit
  • Supplier or vendor audit
  • Regulatory agency inspection
  • Third-party certification audit
  • Other
Q03
매트릭스필수

Based on your most recent audit or your day-to-day observation, how would you rate compliance in each area?

7개 행 × 4개 열
  • Documentation and record-keeping
  • Personnel training and hygiene practices
  • Equipment calibration and maintenance
  • Material and supplier qualification
  • Process and cleaning validation
  • 외 2개
: Fully compliant · Minor gaps noted · Major gaps noted · Not applicable
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 12 months, has this site received a major or critical audit finding?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these areas currently poses the greatest risk to product quality if left unaddressed?

  • Documentation and record-keeping
  • Personnel training and hygiene practices
  • Equipment calibration and maintenance
  • Material and supplier qualification
  • Process and cleaning validation
  • Deviation and CAPA management
  • Facility and environmental controls
  • Data integrity and system access controls
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Highest risk최악:Lowest risk
Q06
의견 척도필수

If a regulatory inspector arrived unannounced today, how confident are you that this site would pass without a major finding?

척도: 010
최소:Not confident at all최대:Completely confident
Q07
장문형

Describe the most significant nonconformance identified in the most recent audit, including its current corrective action status.

Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the root cause behind the respondent's most significant nonconformance or highest-risk area: was it a one-off human error, a process design gap, a resourcing/staffing issue, or a systemic failure across the site? Ask what the corrective action actually changed versus what was documented on paper, whether similar deviations have recurred before, and whether the fix addressed the root cause or just the symptom. If they report no major findings, probe what near-misses or informal workarounds staff use that wouldn't show up in a formal audit.

Q09
평점 척도

How would you rate site leadership's visible day-to-day commitment to quality, beyond what's written in the quality manual?

범위: 15
최소:Not committed최대:Fully committed
Q10
객관식

On average, how long does it take to close a corrective and preventive action (CAPA) at this site?

  • Under 30 days
  • 30-60 days
  • 61-90 days
  • Over 90 days
  • We don't formally track this
Q11
단문형

Is there anything else auditors should know before the next audit?

Q12
객관식

What is your role at this site?

  • Quality Assurance
  • Quality Control
  • Production/Operations
  • Regulatory Affairs
  • Site Leadership
  • External Auditor/Consultant
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

How many years have you worked in GMP-regulated roles?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you — your responses feed directly into the site's audit readiness report and help prioritize which corrective actions to tackle before the next inspection.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond checklist scoring by using an AI follow-up interview to probe the root cause behind the respondent's most significant nonconformance, surfacing systemic issues rather than just a pass/fail.
  • Combines structured multiple-choice and matrix questions across documentation, training, equipment, supplier qualification, validation, and CAPA with an open-ended long-text nonconformance description for context.
  • Captures CAPA closure timelines, leadership commitment ratings, and inspection-readiness confidence alongside a max-diff ranking of which risk area most threatens product quality if left unaddressed.
  • Automatically compiles responses into an audit readiness report, turning self-assessment answers directly into a document usable ahead of the next regulatory inspection.

Typeform

GMP Audit Checklist Form

Typeform's GMP Audit Checklist is a fielding-ready form covering core GMP compliance areas in Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time style. It's designed for straightforward checklist-style data collection rather than deeper diagnostic follow-up. Good for quick compliance snapshots but not for uncovering root causes behind findings.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for GMP audits specifically, unlike generic audit templates
  • Typeform's clean, conversational UI likely improves completion rates for checklist-style questions
  • Quick to deploy for a straightforward compliance self-check

아쉬운 점

  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe root causes behind flagged nonconformances
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated readiness report
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for verifying evidence in real time

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.