모든 템플릿

Youth Crime and Community Safety Perceptions Survey

Captures how residents perceive youth crime trends, its causes, and the effectiveness of local responses like policing, mentorship, and diversion programs. Built for city agencies, community coalitions, and researchers, with an AI follow-up interview that unpacks the reasoning and lived experience behind residents' top-priority intervention and their stance on youth diversion programs.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on youth crime and safety in your community. Your honest perspective helps local leaders decide where to focus resources. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6-8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Over the last 12 months, how do you think youth crime (ages roughly 10-17) has changed in your neighborhood?

  • Decreased a lot
  • Decreased somewhat
  • Stayed about the same
  • Increased somewhat
  • Increased a lot
  • Not sure
Q03
의견 척도필수

How concerned are you about youth crime affecting safety where you live?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q04
객관식

In the last 12 months, which of the following have you personally experienced? Select all that apply.

  • Witnessed vandalism or property damage by youth
  • Witnessed a physical altercation or fight
  • Was the victim of theft or property crime by a young person
  • Had a family member involved with the youth justice system
  • Attended a community meeting about youth safety
Q05
매트릭스필수

How much of a cause do you think each of the following is behind youth crime in your community?

7개 행 × 4개 열
  • Lack of parental supervision or support
  • Limited after-school or recreational programs
  • Poverty or economic hardship
  • Gang involvement or peer pressure
  • Social media influence
  • 외 2개
: Not a cause · Minor cause · Moderate cause · Major cause
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these approaches to reducing youth crime do you think would be most and least effective in your community?

  • More after-school and recreational programs
  • Increased police patrols in neighborhoods
  • Mentorship and role-model programs
  • Restorative justice or diversion programs
  • Job training and employment programs for youth
  • Accessible mental health and counseling services
  • Parenting support and family services
  • Stricter sentencing and enforcement
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most effective최악:Least effective
Q07
의견 척도필수

How much do you trust local police and the justice system to handle youth crime fairly and effectively?

척도: 010
최소:No trust at all최대:Complete trust
Q08
평점 척도

How much do you support diverting first-time, non-violent young offenders into community-based programs instead of formal criminal charges?

범위: 15
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore the reasoning behind this respondent's top-rated intervention from the prioritization exercise and their view on diversion programs for young offenders — ask what a real-world example of that approach working (or failing) would look like to them. If they reported personally witnessing or being affected by an incident, have them walk through what happened and what response, if any, followed. If they expressed low trust in police or the justice system, probe what specifically drove that view.

Q10
객관식

What is your age range? (optional)

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your connection to this community? (optional)

  • Resident
  • Parent or guardian of a young person
  • Teacher or school staff
  • Local business owner
  • Local official or service provider
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for sharing your perspective. Your responses will be combined with others to help guide local priorities and funding for youth safety programs.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively unpacks the reasoning behind each resident's top-priority intervention and their stance on diversion programs, going beyond static rating data
  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scales on concern and trust, a matrix on perceived causes, a MaxDiff on intervention preference, a rating on diversion support) with qualitative depth in one flow
  • Uses transparent, reviewable AI prompts so city agencies and coalitions can see exactly what was asked and why, supporting public accountability
  • Auto-generates a report synthesizing closed-ended trends and interview themes, reducing manual analysis work for community coalitions and researchers

QuestionPro

Youth Crime Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a directly comparable pre-built questionnaire covering youth crime perceptions, similar in topic scope to ours. It relies on standard closed-ended question types (multiple choice, scales) without any adaptive interview component. The page reads as a ready-to-field template rather than a guide, so it is a genuine like-for-like comparison.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built template specifically for youth crime perception research
  • Backed by an established, mature survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Likely easy to deploy quickly given QuestionPro's large template library

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe reasoning behind top-choice interventions or diversion program stances
  • No option for voice-based AI interviews to capture lived experience in respondents' own words
  • No published transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.